Motivations and Barriers to Communicating Software Engineering Research: Insights from Early Career Researchers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24387v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 13:03:46 GMT
• Title: Motivations and Barriers to Communicating Software Engineering Research: Insights from Early Career Researchers
• Abstract summary: We investigate how PhD students in software engineering experience science communication.<n>Our findings reveal a strong tension between aspiration and practice.<n>Findings highlight the need for tailored, balanced support systems.
• Score: 10.18662277085902
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Science communication is increasingly becoming a part of modern research careers, involving researchers to disseminate knowledge, engage broader communities, and increase the societal impact of their work. Despite its growing importance, little is known about how early-career software engineering researchers perceive and navigate science communication in practice. In this paper, we investigate how PhD students in software engineering experience science communication. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 doctoral candidates from diverse international backgrounds. Using thematic analysis, we examine three interconnected dimensions: motivations, communication channels, and barriers. Our findings reveal a strong tension between aspiration and practice. Participants were highly motivated to engage in science communication due to opportunities for collaboration, professional recognition, broader impact, and advocacy for themselves and their research. However, translating these motivations into action was frequently constrained by social anxiety, uncertainty regarding appropriate audiences and communication venues, limited feedback mechanisms, insufficient institutional guidance, and challenges associated with navigating an increasingly fragmented communication landscape. Our findings highlight the need for tailored, balanced support systems that empower software engineering PhD students to engage in science communication effectively and confidently across diverse cultural and institutional environments. We outline practical implications that offer initial guidance for addressing these challenges in future work.

Related papers

• Ethics of Care for Software Engineering [51.80521257060489]
  We argue that the opposition of "caring about" and "caring for" is based on the ethics of care.<n>We advocate for the adoption of ethics of care in software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T20:16:00Z)
• ScienceBoard: Evaluating Multimodal Autonomous Agents in Realistic Scientific Workflows [82.07367406991678]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have extended their impact beyond Natural Language Processing.<n>Among these, computer-using agents are capable of interacting with operating systems as humans do.<n>We introduce ScienceBoard, which encompasses a realistic, multi-domain environment featuring dynamic and visually rich scientific software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T12:27:27Z)
• The Factors Influencing Well-Being in Software Engineers: A Cross-Country Mixed-Method Study [7.388864936625697]
  Despite increasing recognition of mental health challenges in software engineering, few studies focus on the factors that sustain or undermine well-being.<n>This study fills this gap by investigating the specific factors affecting the well-being of software engineers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T14:51:58Z)
• I Felt Pressured to Give 100% All the Time: How Are Neurodivergent Professionals Being Included in Software Development Teams? [0.46873264197900916]
  This study seeks to understand the work experiences of neurodivergent professionals acting in different software development roles.<n>We applied the Sociotechnical Theory (STS) to investigate how the social structures of organizations and their respective work technologies influence the inclusion of these professionals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T02:28:59Z)
• Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability [61.44773053835185]
  Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the computational mechanisms underlying neural networks' capabilities.<n>Despite recent progress toward these goals, there are many open problems in the field that require solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T20:57:18Z)
• Investigating Collaborative Data Practices: a Case Study on Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare Research [1.3178083420209858]
  We look at the collaborative data practices of research consortia tasked with applying AI tools to understand and manage multiple long-term conditions in the UK. Our findings reveal the adaptation of tools that are used for sharing knowledge and the tailoring of information based on the audience. We identify meetings as the key setting for facilitating exchanges between disciplines and allowing for the blending and creation of knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T10:19:33Z)
• Expanding the Role of Affective Phenomena in Multimodal Interaction Research [57.069159905961214]
  We examined over 16,000 papers from selected conferences in multimodal interaction, affective computing, and natural language processing. We identify 910 affect-related papers and present our analysis of the role of affective phenomena in these papers. We find limited research on how affect and emotion predictions might be used by AI systems to enhance machine understanding of human social behaviors and cognitive states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T09:08:39Z)
• AI for Science: An Emerging Agenda [30.260160661295682]
  This report documents the programme and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 22382 "Machine Learning for Science: Bridging Data-Driven and Mechanistic Modelling" The transformative potential of AI stems from its widespread applicability across disciplines, and will only be achieved through integration across research domains. Alongside technical advances, the next wave of progress in the field will come from building a community of machine learning researchers, domain experts, citizen scientists, and engineers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T20:21:43Z)
• Teaching Computer Science Students to Communicate Scientific Findings More Effectively [8.832687148248716]
  Science communication forms the bridge between computer science researchers and their target audience. The necessary skills for good science communication must also be taught, and this has so far been neglected in the field of software engineering education. We designed and implemented a science communication seminar for bachelor students of computer science curricula.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T11:54:23Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• Women, artificial intelligence, and key positions in collaboration networks: Towards a more equal scientific ecosystem [0.0]
  This study investigates the effects of several driving factors on acquiring key positions in scientific collaboration networks through a gender lens. It was found that, regardless of gender, scientific performance in terms of quantity and impact plays a crucial in possessing the "social researcher" in the network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T15:15:04Z)
• Learnings from Frontier Development Lab and SpaceML -- AI Accelerators for NASA and ESA [57.06643156253045]
  Research with AI and ML technologies lives in a variety of settings with often asynchronous goals and timelines. We perform a case study of the Frontier Development Lab (FDL), an AI accelerator under a public-private partnership from NASA and ESA. FDL research follows principled practices that are grounded in responsible development, conduct, and dissemination of AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T21:23:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.