Attribution and Uncertainty Behavior of Learned Residual Gyro Correction for Gyro-Stellar Estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24608v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:10:02 GMT
• Title: Attribution and Uncertainty Behavior of Learned Residual Gyro Correction for Gyro-Stellar Estimation
• Abstract summary: This work investigates uncertainty decomposition and explainability in a deep learning-based framework for gyroscope bias correction.<n>A 1-D Convolutional Neural Network is trained to predict residual angular rate corrections from multi-sensor inputs.<n>The network produces both mean corrections and input-dependent (heteroscedastic) aleatoric uncertainty.
• Score: 36.84730626907743
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This work investigates uncertainty decomposition and explainability in a deep learning-based framework for gyroscope bias correction. A 1-D Convolutional Neural Network is trained to predict residual angular rate corrections from multi-sensor inputs, including gyroscope and star tracker measurements. The bias corrections are sent to a flight-representative Gyro-Stellar Estimator. The network produces both mean corrections and input-dependent (heteroscedastic) aleatoric uncertainty, while epistemic uncertainty is estimated via an ensemble of independently trained models. The proposed approach is trained under nominal conditions and evaluated in both nominal and structured perturbations that include additive and temporally correlated noise. Gradient-based attribution methods are applied to both the correction and uncertainty outputs, enabling a decomposition of the evidence that drives state updates and uncertainty estimates. By aggregating attribution patterns across rotational axes and regimes, we reveal axis-specific behaviors and characterize how structured perturbations influence the collaboration between aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. Uncertainty analysis shows that aleatoric uncertainty increases with perturbation intensity, but the distributions overlap and the calibration is not consistent across regimes. On the other hand, epistemic uncertainty gives a clear signal that gets clearer as the distributional shift happens, showing that the models disagree more. These results show that aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty work well together and that epistemic uncertainty is better at distinguishing between nominal and perturbed operating conditions. The results provide insight into the behavior of hybrid learning-based state estimation components and motivate the use of uncertainty for downstream monitoring and fault detection.

Related papers

• ConformaDecompose: Explaining Uncertainty via Calibration Localization [0.26385121748044166]
  Conformal Prediction provides distribution-free prediction intervals with guaranteed coverage.<n>Its reliance on a single global calibration threshold obscures the sources of uncertainty at the instance level.<n>We introduce an uncertainty-aware explainability framework that analyses the reducibility of calibration-induced uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T19:58:15Z)
• TRIAGE: Type-Routed Interventions via Aleatoric-Epistemic Gated Estimation in Robotic Manipulation and Adaptive Perception -- Don't Treat All Uncertainty the Same [2.755751829139168]
  Most uncertainty-aware robotic systems collapse prediction uncertainty into a single scalar score and use it to trigger uniform corrective responses.<n>This aggregation obscures whether uncertainty arises from corrupted observations or from mismatch between the learned model and the true system dynamics.<n>We introduce a lightweight post hoc framework that decomposes uncertainty into aleatoric and epistemic components and uses these signals to regulate system responses at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T09:07:43Z)
• Credal Concept Bottleneck Models: Structural Separation of Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty [38.040646841317965]
  We propose a credal-set formulation in which uncertainty is represented as a set of predictive distributions.<n>We instantiate this idea in a Variational Credal Concept Bottleneck Model with two disjoint uncertainty heads trained by disjoint objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T10:54:57Z)
• Cooperative Bayesian and variance networks disentangle aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties [0.0]
  Real-world data contains aleatoric uncertainty - irreducible noise arising from imperfect measurements or from incomplete knowledge about the data generation process.<n>Mean variance estimation (MVE) networks can learn this type of uncertainty but require ad-hoc regularization strategies to avoid overfitting.<n>We propose to train a variance network with a Bayesian neural network and demonstrate that the resulting model disentangles aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties while improving the mean estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-05T15:50:52Z)
• Generalized Gaussian Temporal Difference Error for Uncertainty-aware Reinforcement Learning [0.19418036471925312]
  We introduce a novel framework for generalized Gaussian error modeling in deep reinforcement learning.<n>We improve the estimation and mitigation of data-dependent aleatoric uncertainty.<n> Experiments with policy gradient algorithms demonstrate significant performance gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T08:12:25Z)
• Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definition [109.62614226793833]
  The trade-off between robustness and accuracy has been widely studied in the adversarial literature. We find that it may stem from the improperly defined robust error, which imposes an inductive bias of local invariance. By definition, SCORE facilitates the reconciliation between robustness and accuracy, while still handling the worst-case uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T10:36:09Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• DEUP: Direct Epistemic Uncertainty Prediction [56.087230230128185]
  Epistemic uncertainty is part of out-of-sample prediction error due to the lack of knowledge of the learner. We propose a principled approach for directly estimating epistemic uncertainty by learning to predict generalization error and subtracting an estimate of aleatoric uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T23:50:35Z)
• The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations [105.4223982696279]
  The distribution of a neural network's latent representations has been successfully used to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data. This work investigates whether this distribution correlates with a model's epistemic uncertainty, thus indicating its ability to generalise to novel inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T17:30:35Z)
• Learning to Predict Error for MRI Reconstruction [67.76632988696943]
  We demonstrate that predictive uncertainty estimated by the current methods does not highly correlate with prediction error. We propose a novel method that estimates the target labels and magnitude of the prediction error in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T15:55:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.