A Cross-lingual Comparison of Human and Classification Model Entrainment Behavior in Code-switched Speech Settings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25202v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 02:16:41 GMT
• Title: A Cross-lingual Comparison of Human and Classification Model Entrainment Behavior in Code-switched Speech Settings
• Abstract summary: We present a novel cross-lingual analysis of entrainment in Mandarin-English, Hindi-English, and Spanish-English dialogue.<n>We ask whether classification models capture these human behavioral patterns.<n>Our approach introduces a human-grounded framework for evaluating model decision-making in multilingual stylistic contexts.
• Score: 10.889746985417675
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Conversational entrainment is well-studied in monolingual and written contexts, but remains underexplored in spoken code-switching (CSW). We present a novel cross-lingual analysis of entrainment in Mandarin-English, Hindi-English, and Spanish-English dialogue and show that, while lexical entrainment generalizes across language pairs, entrainment over acoustic-prosodic and CSW style aspects exhibits context-specific variation. We build on these findings by asking whether classification models capture these human behavioral patterns. Applying feature importance and ablation analyses, we find that classical and Transformer-based classifiers detect entrainment reasonably well but consistently prioritize features other than those most salient to human entraining behavior. Our approach introduces a human-grounded framework for evaluating model decision-making in multilingual stylistic contexts, and suggests future challenges for developing conversational agents capable of producing naturalistic code-switched speech.

Related papers

• L-Proto: Language-Aware Episodic Prototypical Training for Multilingual Speaker Verification [49.128847336227636]
  We propose L-Proto, a language-aware episodic training strategy that constructs language-consistent episodes.<n> Experiments on the TidyVoice Challenge benchmark demonstrate consistent performance improvements over conventional fine-tuning and random episodic sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T01:57:41Z)
• When Meanings Meet: Investigating the Emergence and Quality of Shared Concept Spaces during Multilingual Language Model Training [57.230355403478995]
  We investigate the development of language-agnostic concept spaces during pretraining of EuroLLM.<n>We find that shared concept spaces emerge early and continue to refine, but that alignment with them is language-dependent.<n>In contrast to prior work, our fine-grained manual analysis reveals that some apparent gains in translation quality reflect shifts in behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T11:23:01Z)
• On the Fallacy of Global Token Perplexity in Spoken Language Model Evaluation [88.77441715819366]
  Generative spoken language models pretrained on large-scale raw audio can continue a speech prompt with appropriate content.<n>We propose a variety of likelihood- and generative-based evaluation methods that serve in place of naive global token perplexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T22:01:56Z)
• Neighbors and relatives: How do speech embeddings reflect linguistic connections across the world? [0.7168794329741259]
  This study employs embeddings from the fine-tuned XLS-R self-supervised language identification model vox107-xls-r-300m-wav2vec to analyze relationships between 106 world languages.<n>Using linear discriminant analysis (LDA), language embeddings are clustered and compared with genealogical, lexical, and geographical distances.<n>The results demonstrate that embedding-based distances align closely with traditional measures, effectively capturing both global and local typological patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T08:33:34Z)
• Cross-Lingual Speech Emotion Recognition: Humans vs. Self-Supervised Models [16.0617753653454]
  This study presents a comparative analysis between human performance and SSL models.<n>We also compare the SER ability of models and humans at both utterance- and segment-levels.<n>Our findings reveal that models, with appropriate knowledge transfer, can adapt to the target language and achieve performance comparable to native speakers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T13:27:17Z)
• Learning Phonotactics from Linguistic Informants [54.086544221761486]
  Our model iteratively selects or synthesizes a data-point according to one of a range of information-theoretic policies. We find that the information-theoretic policies that our model uses to select items to query the informant achieve sample efficiency comparable to, or greater than, fully supervised approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T00:18:56Z)
• BabySLM: language-acquisition-friendly benchmark of self-supervised spoken language models [56.93604813379634]
  Self-supervised techniques for learning speech representations have been shown to develop linguistic competence from exposure to speech without the need for human labels. We propose a language-acquisition-friendly benchmark to probe spoken language models at the lexical and syntactic levels. We highlight two exciting challenges that need to be addressed for further progress: bridging the gap between text and speech and between clean speech and in-the-wild speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T12:54:38Z)
• Corpus-Guided Contrast Sets for Morphosyntactic Feature Detection in Low-Resource English Varieties [3.3536302616846734]
  We present a human-in-the-loop approach to generate and filter effective contrast sets via corpus-guided edits. We show that our approach improves feature detection for both Indian English and African American English, demonstrate how it can assist linguistic research, and release our fine-tuned models for use by other researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T21:19:31Z)
• Analyzing the Mono- and Cross-Lingual Pretraining Dynamics of Multilingual Language Models [73.11488464916668]
  This study investigates the dynamics of the multilingual pretraining process. We probe checkpoints taken from throughout XLM-R pretraining, using a suite of linguistic tasks. Our analysis shows that the model achieves high in-language performance early on, with lower-level linguistic skills acquired before more complex ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T03:35:00Z)
• Cross-lingual Low Resource Speaker Adaptation Using Phonological Features [2.8080708404213373]
  We train a language-agnostic multispeaker model conditioned on a set of phonologically derived features common across different languages. With as few as 32 and 8 utterances of target speaker data, we obtain high speaker similarity scores and naturalness comparable to the corresponding literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-17T12:33:42Z)
• Is Incoherence Surprising? Targeted Evaluation of Coherence Prediction from Language Models [7.5413579967970605]
  We design an extendable set of test suites addressing different aspects of discourse and dialogue coherence. Unlike most previous coherence evaluation studies, we address specific linguistic devices beyond sentence order perturbations. We show that this paradigm is equally suited to evaluate linguistic qualities that contribute to the notion of coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T20:28:33Z)
• Evaluating Models of Robust Word Recognition with Serial Reproduction [8.17947290421835]
  We compare several broad-coverage probabilistic generative language models in their ability to capture human linguistic expectations. We find that those models that make use of abstract representations of preceding linguistic context best predict the changes made by people in the course of serial reproduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T20:16:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.