Cognitive Convergence: Deep Similarities Between Large Language Models and Human Cognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26179v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 18:37:48 GMT
• Title: Cognitive Convergence: Deep Similarities Between Large Language Models and Human Cognition
• Abstract summary: LLMs are widely regarded as alien intelligences, systems whose cognitive operations are fundamentally unlike our own.<n>We argue that this framing is mistaken.<n> LLMs clearly differ from humans in important respects, including their physical substrate, learning history, and the environments with which they interact.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: LLMs are widely regarded as alien intelligences, systems whose cognitive operations are fundamentally unlike our own. Apparent similarities to human cognition are therefore often seen as the result of anthropomorphic projection. We argue that this framing is mistaken. LLMs clearly differ from humans in important respects, including their physical substrate, learning history, and the environments with which they interact. These differences make it all the more striking that contemporary LLM-based systems converge with human cognition on a number of principles of cognitive organization with longstanding support in cognitive science. We identify structural correspondences across five dimensions: inferential organization, computational architecture, representational structure, prediction-driven learning, and reinforcement-learning-like mechanisms supporting goal-directed action. These correspondences support a broader model of intelligent cognition in which core principles long used to explain human intelligence also characterize contemporary LLM-based systems.

Related papers

• NeuroCogMap Reveals Cognitive Organization of Large Language Models [82.70079471723963]
  We present NeuroCogMap, a cognitive neuroscience-inspired framework that organizes internal features of large language models into functional parcels.<n>These parcels form a stable and semantically coherent organization that is partly conserved across models.<n>These findings establish NeuroCogMap as a system-level framework for mapping functional organization in artificial systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T03:48:49Z)
• The New Associationism: Lessons from Deep Learning [0.0]
  This paper argues that taking AI seriously supports a modest but genuine associationism.<n>The central finding is that supervised learning underlies a surprisingly wide range of contemporary AI systems.<n>It defuses the once-influential argument that associationist mechanisms are too limited to account for human cognitive capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T10:51:37Z)
• Toward Cognitive Supersensing in Multimodal Large Language Model [67.15559571626747]
  We introduce Cognitive Supersensing, a training paradigm that endows MLLMs with human-like visual imagery capabilities.<n>In experiments, MLLMs trained with Cognitive Supersensing significantly outperform state-of-the-art baselines on CogSense-Bench.<n>We will open-source the CogSense-Bench and our model weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T02:19:50Z)
• Cognitive Mirrors: Exploring the Diverse Functional Roles of Attention Heads in LLM Reasoning [54.12174882424842]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in a variety of tasks, but remain largely opaque in terms of their internal mechanisms.<n>We propose a novel interpretability framework to systematically analyze the roles and behaviors of attention heads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T10:24:34Z)
• Unraveling the cognitive patterns of Large Language Models through module communities [45.399985422756224]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have reshaped our world with significant advancements in science, engineering, and society.<n>Despite their ubiquity and utility, the underlying mechanisms of LLM remain concealed within billions of parameters and complex structures.<n>We address this gap by adopting approaches to understanding emerging cognition in biology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T16:49:38Z)
• From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Humans Trade Compression for Meaning [63.25540801694765]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate striking linguistic abilities, yet whether they achieve this same balance remains unclear.<n>We apply the Information Bottleneck principle to quantitatively compare how LLMs and humans navigate this compression-meaning trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T16:29:00Z)
• How Deep is Love in LLMs' Hearts? Exploring Semantic Size in Human-like Cognition [75.11808682808065]
  This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit similar tendencies in understanding semantic size.<n>Our findings reveal that multi-modal training is crucial for LLMs to achieve more human-like understanding.<n> Lastly, we examine whether LLMs are influenced by attention-grabbing headlines with larger semantic sizes in a real-world web shopping scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T03:35:56Z)
• Revealing emergent human-like conceptual representations from language prediction [90.73285317321312]
  Large language models (LLMs) trained solely through next-token prediction on text exhibit strikingly human-like behaviors.<n>Are these models developing concepts akin to those of humans?<n>We found that LLMs can flexibly derive concepts from linguistic descriptions in relation to contextual cues about other concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T23:54:17Z)
• CogniDual Framework: Self-Training Large Language Models within a Dual-System Theoretical Framework for Improving Cognitive Tasks [39.43278448546028]
  Kahneman's dual-system theory elucidates the human decision-making process, distinguishing between the rapid, intuitive System 1 and the deliberative, rational System 2. Recent advancements have positioned large language Models (LLMs) as formidable tools nearing human-level proficiency in various cognitive tasks. This study introduces the textbfCogniDual Framework for LLMs (CFLLMs), designed to assess whether LLMs can, through self-training, evolve from deliberate deduction to intuitive responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T09:33:24Z)
• Psychomatics -- A Multidisciplinary Framework for Understanding Artificial Minds [0.319565400223685]
  This paper introduces Psychomatics, a framework bridging cognitive science, linguistics, and computer science. It aims to better understand the high-level functioning of LLMs. Psychomatics holds the potential to yield transformative insights into the nature of language, cognition, and intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T12:53:41Z)
• Human-like object concept representations emerge naturally in multimodal large language models [24.003766123531545]
  We combined behavioral and neuroimaging analyses to explore the relationship between object concept representations in Large Language Models (LLMs) and human cognition.<n>Our findings advance the understanding of machine intelligence and inform the development of more human-like artificial cognitive systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T08:17:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.