LoRA Scaffolded Policy Optimization (LSPO): A Sampling-Time Low-Rank Scaffold for Recovering Reinforcement-Learning Gradient on Zero-Reward Cliff Prompts
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27787v1
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 07:21:34 GMT
- Title: LoRA Scaffolded Policy Optimization (LSPO): A Sampling-Time Low-Rank Scaffold for Recovering Reinforcement-Learning Gradient on Zero-Reward Cliff Prompts
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) for mathematical reasoning suffers from a structural blind spot.<n>We introduce LoRA Scaffolded Policy Optimization (LSPO), a sampling-time mechanism that recovers this lost gradient.<n>On DeepMath-103K with DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B, evaluated over n=5 paired seeds per arm, LSPO's 5-seed mean matches or beats a DAPO baseline on all 16 cells.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) for mathematical reasoning suffers from a structural blind spot: on "cliff" prompts-those on which every sampled rollout in a group fails-the group-normalized advantage is identically zero, so GRPO produces no gradient on precisely the prompts at the frontier of the model's capability. We introduce LoRA Scaffolded Policy Optimization (LSPO), a sampling-time mechanism that recovers this lost gradient. Each RL step, LSPO detects cliff prompts, fits a small low-rank (LoRA) adapter by a brief supervised step on their ground-truth solutions, re-rolls the cliffs with the base-plus-adapter model, splices the now-successful completions back into the RL batch with an importance-sampling correction, and takes a GRPO step on the base alone; the adapter receives only the supervised gradient and is discarded at checkpoint, yielding a base-only model. On DeepMath-103K with DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B, evaluated over n=5 paired seeds per arm at a matched 1000-step reporting horizon, LSPO's 5-seed mean matches or beats a DAPO baseline on all 16 (benchmark, pass@k) cells (15 strict wins and one exact tie), with gains of up to +10.7 points on AIME24/pass@4, +6.7 points on AIME24 and AIME26 at pass@16, and +2.4 points on MATH500/pass@1; averaged over the 16 cells the improvement is +3.8 points.
Related papers
- CIGPO: Contextual Information-Gain Policy Optimization for Multi-Turn Evidence-Reading LLM Agents [1.4298580363875282]
Training multi-turn evidence-reading agents with outcome-only reinforcement learning is unstable because intermediate turns receive little direct credit.<n>In HotpotQA experiments with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, GRPO initially improves (standard F1 0.430) but subsequently collapses to 100% format-violating outputs.<n>We propose a variance-textual strategy: by assigning per-turn rewards to intermediate evidence-reading turns, we prevent the group reward distribution from collapsing to a single value.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-26T11:50:29Z) - ARBOR: Online Process Rewards via a Reusable Rubric Buffer for Search Agents [48.80766702702854]
LLM-based search agents are trained predominantly with outcome-only reward, leaving the search process itself unsupervised.<n>This signal degenerates on outcome-homogeneous groups where all sampled trajectories share the same correctness, yielding zero within-group advantage and no gradient.<n>We propose ARBOR (Adaptive Buffer for Online Reward), a reusable process-reward framework that maintains a rubric memory shared across queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T06:58:54Z) - Right Makes Might: Aligning Verified Hidden States Empowers RL Reasoning [55.264863369127774]
Current methods reduce each correct rollout to a single reward bit, ignoring the geometric structure shared among their hidden states.<n>We propose Hidden-Align, an auxiliary loss function that aligns the last-layer hidden states of correct rollouts at the anchor token during RL training, with zero overhead in both training and inference.<n>On eight mathematical reasoning benchmarks, Hidden-Align improves average pass@1 over the DAPO baseline by 3.8, 6.2, and 5.4 percentage points on Qwen3-1.7B, 4B, and 14B respectively, with consistent pass@k gains across all three scales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T06:51:15Z) - VeriGate: Verifier-Gated Step-Level Supervision for GRPO [51.26100506256885]
Group Relative Policy Optimization is an effective recipe for training reasoning models with verifier-based outcome rewards.<n>We present VeriGate, a verifier-gated extension of GRPO that addresses these limitations with three design choices.<n>We show that VeriGate improves average accuracy by about 20% and 12% for 1.5B and 7B models respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T18:20:32Z) - Step-wise Rubric Rewards for LLM Reasoning [72.17879367869503]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is widely used to improve reasoning in large language models.<n>We find 18.2% of steps in correct responses are wrong yet positively rewarded.<n>Across six mathematical reasoning benchmarks, SRaR improves average accuracy over RaR by 3.57 points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-17T07:08:14Z) - Rollout Pass-Rate Control: Steering Binary-Reward RL Toward Its Most Informative Regime [28.346931878148524]
Prefix Sampling (PS) replays self-generated trajectory prefixes to steer skewed groups toward this regime.<n>PS reaches the baseline high-score regime within evaluation variability while delivering 2.01x and 1.55x end-to-end wall-clock speedups.<n>AIME 2025 experiments on 4B and 8B show the same pass-rate-control pattern.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-06T16:44:38Z) - REAL: Regression-Aware Reinforcement Learning for LLM-as-a-Judge [83.2858110368572]
We propose textbfREAL (underlineREgression-underlineAware Reinforcement underlineLThought), a principled RL framework designed to optimize regression rewards.<n>We show that REAL consistently outperforms both regression-aware SFT baselines and standard RL methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T21:19:08Z) - Single-stream Policy Optimization [21.214853668053234]
We introduce Single-stream Policy Optimization (SPO)<n>SPO replaces per-group baselines with a persistent, KL-adaptive value tracker and normalizes advantages globally across the batch.<n>Being group-free, SPO enables higher throughput and scales effectively in long-horizon or tool-integrated settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-16T16:39:11Z) - A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforce [68.99924691391048]
We revisit GRPO from a reinforce-like algorithm perspective and analyze its core components.<n>We find that a simple rejection sampling baseline, RAFT, yields competitive performance than GRPO and PPO.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Reinforce-Rej, a minimal extension of policy gradient that filters both entirely incorrect and entirely correct samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-15T16:15:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.