Rethinking and formalising the state across languages: a unified computational learning theory account
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00523v2
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 22:01:55 GMT
- Title: Rethinking and formalising the state across languages: a unified computational learning theory account
- Abstract summary: Article argues that the state is a context-dependent morphosyntactic mechanism that selects grammatical templates across synthetic languages.<n>A learning algorithm based on finite-set operations acquires and predicts state-dependent grammatical configurations.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: The linguistic notion of state has traditionally been restricted to the construct (annexation) state of Afroasiatic languages and treated as a language-specific morphosyntactic phenomenon. This article argues instead that the state is a systemic, context-dependent morphosyntactic mechanism that selects grammatical templates across synthetic languages. Within the Template-Based Modular Cognitive framework, taking Riffian as its primary empirical basis, the proposed theory provides a unified explanation for diverse nominal marking patterns traditionally analysed independently and is formalised as a symbolic computational model in which the state is represented by a set-valued function over grammatical templates. A learning algorithm based on finite-set operations acquires and predicts state-dependent grammatical configurations. Beyond nominal morphology, the framework has broader implications for theories of nominal structure and lexical cognition, in particular offering a unified analysis of determiner-noun structure. These results suggest that the state constitutes one instance of a broader class of syntactically conditioned dependencies that also includes agreement and grammatical case.
Related papers
- Does Syntax Matter? A Graph-Augmented Variational Topic Model for Computational Social Sciences [51.56484100374058]
This paper introduces the Structural Contextual Probabilistic Topic Model ( SCPTM), an architecture that incorporates syntactic dependency relations into topic inference.<n>We evaluate seven topic modeling techniques across four corpora differing in register and discourse structure.<n>Results show that SCPTM's neural architecture yields substantial gains in document-topic alignment over generative baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-07T17:39:06Z) - On the Proper Treatment of Units in Surprisal Theory [50.52310749207036]
We show that surprisal-based predictors depend implicitly on ad hoc procedures that conflate two distinct modeling choices.<n>We argue that surprisal-based analyses should make these choices explicit and treat tokenization as an implementation detail.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-30T17:33:58Z) - Towards a theory of morphology-driven marking in the lexicon: The case of the state [0.0]
We propose a formal model termed morphology-driven marking.<n>Nouns are organised into modular cognitive sets, each with its own morphological template and unmarked form.<n>It is proposed that the concept of state be extended to all synthetic languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-03T19:35:41Z) - Schoenfeld's Anatomy of Mathematical Reasoning by Language Models [56.656180566692946]
We adopt Schoenfeld's Episode Theory as an inductive, intermediate-scale lens and introduce ThinkARM (Anatomy of Reasoning in Models)<n>ThinkARM explicitly abstracts reasoning traces into functional reasoning steps such as Analysis, Explore, Implement, verify, etc.<n>We show that episode-level representations make reasoning steps explicit, enabling systematic analysis of how reasoning is structured, stabilized, and altered in modern language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T02:44:25Z) - Scaling Laws and Representation Learning in Simple Hierarchical Languages: Transformers vs. Convolutional Architectures [49.19753720526998]
We derive theoretical scaling laws for neural network performance on synthetic datasets.<n>We validate that convolutional networks, whose structure aligns with that of the generative process through locality and weight sharing, enjoy a faster scaling of performance.<n>This finding clarifies the architectural biases underlying neural scaling laws and highlights how representation learning is shaped by the interaction between model architecture and the statistical properties of data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-11T17:44:14Z) - Large Language Models as Quasi-crystals: Coherence Without Repetition in Generative Text [0.0]
essay proposes an analogy between large language models (LLMs) and quasicrystals, systems that exhibit global coherence without periodic repetition, generated through local constraints.<n> Drawing on the history of quasicrystals, it highlights an alternative mode of coherence in generative language: constraint-based organization without repetition or symbolic intent.<n>This essay aims to reframe the current discussion around large language models, not by rejecting existing methods, but by suggesting an additional axis of interpretation grounded in structure rather than semantics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-16T11:27:47Z) - The Foundations of Tokenization: Statistical and Computational Concerns [51.370165245628975]
Tokenization is a critical step in the NLP pipeline.<n>Despite its recognized importance as a standard representation method in NLP, the theoretical underpinnings of tokenization are not yet fully understood.<n>The present paper contributes to addressing this theoretical gap by proposing a unified formal framework for representing and analyzing tokenizer models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T11:12:28Z) - An Encoding of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks into Higher-Order Logic [57.24311218570012]
This approach allows for the computer-assisted analysis of abstract dialectical frameworks.
Exemplary applications include the formal analysis and verification of meta-theoretical properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-08T09:32:26Z) - From Word Models to World Models: Translating from Natural Language to
the Probabilistic Language of Thought [124.40905824051079]
We propose rational meaning construction, a computational framework for language-informed thinking.
We frame linguistic meaning as a context-sensitive mapping from natural language into a probabilistic language of thought.
We show that LLMs can generate context-sensitive translations that capture pragmatically-appropriate linguistic meanings.
We extend our framework to integrate cognitively-motivated symbolic modules.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-22T05:14:00Z) - Oracle Linguistic Graphs Complement a Pretrained Transformer Language
Model: A Cross-formalism Comparison [13.31232311913236]
We examine the extent to which, in principle, linguistic graph representations can complement and improve neural language modeling.
We find that, overall, semantic constituency structures are most useful to language modeling performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-15T04:29:02Z) - Plurality and Quantification in Graph Representation of Meaning [4.82512586077023]
Our graph language covers the essentials of natural language semantics using only monadic second-order variables.
We present a unification-based mechanism for constructing semantic graphs at a simple syntax-semantics interface.
The present graph formalism is applied to linguistic issues in distributive predication, cross-categorial conjunction, and scope permutation of quantificational expressions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-13T07:04:41Z) - Modelling Compositionality and Structure Dependence in Natural Language [0.12183405753834563]
Drawing on linguistics and set theory, a formalisation of these ideas is presented in the first half of this thesis.
We see how cognitive systems that process language need to have certain functional constraints.
Using the advances of word embedding techniques, a model of relational learning is simulated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-22T17:28:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.