Subtype Robustness Is Not Just Accuracy: Calibration Under Unseen Subtype Shift

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00928v1
• Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 01:49:59 GMT
• Title: Subtype Robustness Is Not Just Accuracy: Calibration Under Unseen Subtype Shift
• Abstract summary: Subtype robustness asks whether a model keeps the correct coarse prediction when test examples come from fine-grained subtypes absent from training but still inside a known coarse category.<n>We present the first systematic study of the question across ImageNet, BREEDS, iNaturalist and CIFAR-100 with five architectures.
• Score: 1.2085879670633297
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Subtype robustness asks whether a model keeps the correct coarse prediction when test examples come from fine-grained subtypes absent from training but still inside a known coarse category. Prior work studies this almost entirely through accuracy. We ask whether the model also stays calibrated. We present the first systematic study of the question across ImageNet, BREEDS, iNaturalist and CIFAR-100 with five architectures. Calibration breaks down on unseen subtypes, where accuracy drops while confidence barely follows, leaving the model systematically overconfident exactly where it has become less accurate. At matched accuracy loss, generic image corruption causes a much larger drop in confidence, so the effect is not a general consequence of losing accuracy. The model reacts to visible degradation but not to in-taxonomy novelty. Recalibration tuned on seen subtypes narrows the gap but does not close it, and out-of-distribution scores flag the affected inputs only weakly. Subtype robustness should therefore be evaluated through calibration, not accuracy alone.

Related papers

• When Modality Gap Reduction Fails: Prediction-Level Hubness in CLIP [9.413762502389451]
  A smaller average image-text gap does not necessarily lead to consistent accuracy gains.<n>We show that modality gap correction can alter the relative decision structure among classes and cause predictions to concentrate on a small subset of classes.<n>Our results suggest that gap correction should be evaluated not only by average alignment, but also by its impact on downstream prediction structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T11:46:56Z)
• DriftScope: Measuring The Hidden Effects of Diffusion Model Adaptation [50.584834483403675]
  Adapting pre-trained text-to-image diffusion models, whether to learn new visual concepts or erase unwanted ones, is routinely evaluated on its intended effects alone.<n>We demonstrate that adaptation systematically damages semantically unrelated concepts in ways that aggregate metrics structurally cannot surface.<n>We introduce DriftScope, a prompt-level diagnostic tool that takes any two model checkpoints and returns a ranked list of tokens whose visual concepts have shifted most between them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T20:57:51Z)
• Rethinking Early Stopping: Refine, Then Calibrate [49.966899634962374]
  We present a novel variational formulation of the calibration-refinement decomposition.<n>We provide theoretical and empirical evidence that calibration and refinement errors are not minimized simultaneously during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T15:03:54Z)
• Optimizing Calibration by Gaining Aware of Prediction Correctness [30.619608580138802]
  Cross-Entropy (CE) loss is widely used for calibrator training, which enforces the model to increase confidence on the ground truth class.<n>We propose a new post-hoc calibration objective derived from the aim of calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T17:25:43Z)
• Instant Uncertainty Calibration of NeRFs Using a Meta-calibrator [60.47106421809998]
  We introduce the concept of a meta-calibrator that performs uncertainty calibration for NeRFs with a single forward pass. We show that the meta-calibrator can generalize on unseen scenes and achieves well-calibrated and state-of-the-art uncertainty for NeRFs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T21:29:31Z)
• Proximity-Informed Calibration for Deep Neural Networks [49.330703634912915]
  ProCal is a plug-and-play algorithm with a theoretical guarantee to adjust sample confidence based on proximity. We show that ProCal is effective in addressing proximity bias and improving calibration on balanced, long-tail, and distribution-shift settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T16:40:51Z)
• Bridging Precision and Confidence: A Train-Time Loss for Calibrating Object Detection [58.789823426981044]
  We propose a novel auxiliary loss formulation that aims to align the class confidence of bounding boxes with the accurateness of predictions. Our results reveal that our train-time loss surpasses strong calibration baselines in reducing calibration error for both in and out-domain scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T08:56:21Z)
• Confidence and Dispersity Speak: Characterising Prediction Matrix for Unsupervised Accuracy Estimation [51.809741427975105]
  This work aims to assess how well a model performs under distribution shifts without using labels. We use the nuclear norm that has been shown to be effective in characterizing both properties. We show that the nuclear norm is more accurate and robust in accuracy than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T13:30:48Z)
• Beyond calibration: estimating the grouping loss of modern neural networks [68.8204255655161]
  Proper scoring rule theory shows that given the calibration loss, the missing piece to characterize individual errors is the grouping loss. We show that modern neural network architectures in vision and NLP exhibit grouping loss, notably in distribution shifts settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T07:04:20Z)
• Confidence Calibration for Intent Detection via Hyperspherical Space and Rebalanced Accuracy-Uncertainty Loss [17.26964140836123]
  In some scenarios, users do not only care about the accuracy but also the confidence of model. We propose a model using the hyperspherical space and rebalanced accuracy-uncertainty loss. Our model outperforms the existing calibration methods and achieves a significant improvement on the calibration metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T12:01:33Z)
• T-Cal: An optimal test for the calibration of predictive models [49.11538724574202]
  We consider detecting mis-calibration of predictive models using a finite validation dataset as a hypothesis testing problem. detecting mis-calibration is only possible when the conditional probabilities of the classes are sufficiently smooth functions of the predictions. We propose T-Cal, a minimax test for calibration based on a de-biased plug-in estimator of the $ell$-Expected Error (ECE)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T16:58:54Z)
• Calibrated and Sharp Uncertainties in Deep Learning via Density Estimation [10.209143402485406]
  This paper argues that calibration is important in practice and is easy to maintain.<n>We introduce a simple training procedure based on recalibration that yields calibrated models without sacrificing overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T06:19:05Z)
• Bayesian Confidence Calibration for Epistemic Uncertainty Modelling [4.358626952482686]
  We introduce a framework to obtain confidence estimates in conjunction with an uncertainty of the calibration method. We achieve state-of-the-art calibration performance for object detection calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-21T10:53:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.