A Statistical Framework for Data-Driven Discovery of Differential Performance in Clinical Risk Prediction Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01333v1
• Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 15:53:22 GMT
• Title: A Statistical Framework for Data-Driven Discovery of Differential Performance in Clinical Risk Prediction Models
• Abstract summary: Predictive models employing artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly being used for decision support in healthcare settings.<n>These models may exhibit differential performance across population subgroups defined by race, age, sex, and other factors.<n>In real-world settings, important model performance disparities may arise in unknown subgroups defined by multiple intersecting characteristics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Predictive models employing artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly being used for decision support in healthcare settings. These models may exhibit differential performance across population subgroups defined by race, age, sex, and other factors and cause disparate clinical impacts, leading to intensive recent study of what has been termed "model fairness". While many methods have been proposed to assess risk prediction model fairness, these techniques generally require that the end user pre-specify the groups across which fairness is to be evaluated. In real-world settings, however, important model performance disparities may arise in unknown subgroups defined by multiple intersecting characteristics. To address this problem, we propose the unfairness tree (utree), a data-driven recursive partitioning framework for identifying subgroups with differential model performance. In simulations, the utree exhibits nominal empirical type I error rates and good ability to detect, quantify, and characterize performance discrepancies defined by higher-order variable interactions. In six mortality risk models fit to the GUSTO-I acute myocardial infarction trial dataset, utrees identified subgroup-specific performance patterns, with age, sex, blood pressure, and Killip class consistently associated with differential model performance.

Related papers

• Bounding the Causal Impact of ML-assisted Decision-Making via Counterfactual Correctness [2.9267249513932008]
  We present a partial-identification approach to constructing bounds on the causal effect of a new model.<n>The core innovation in our approach is to leverage assumptions relating fine-grained predictive accuracy to downstream outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T20:45:10Z)
• Rethinking external validation for the target population: Capturing patient-level similarity with a generative model [1.5535982620458004]
  We propose a framework that quantifies each external patient's similarity to the development data.<n>We use generative models, specifically autoencoders, to estimate similarity.<n>Results: Our framework revealed substantial variation in model performance across similarity-defined subgroups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T22:11:03Z)
• Investigating the Impact of Histopathological Foundation Models on Regressive Prediction of Homologous Recombination Deficiency [52.50039435394964]
  We systematically evaluate foundation models for regression-based tasks.<n>We extract patch-level features from whole slide images (WSI) using five state-of-the-art foundation models.<n>Models are trained to predict continuous HRD scores based on these extracted features across breast, endometrial, and lung cancer cohorts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T14:06:50Z)
• On the Role of Calibration in Benchmarking Algorithmic Fairness for Skin Cancer Detection [0.03066137405373616]
  We assess the performance of the leading skin cancer detection algorithm of the ISIC 2020 Challenge dataset.<n>We compare it with the second and third place models, focusing on subgroups defined by sex, race, and age.<n>Our findings reveal that while existing models enhance discriminative accuracy, they often over-diagnose risk and exhibit calibration issues when applied to new datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T23:51:04Z)
• A prediction and behavioural analysis of machine learning methods for modelling travel mode choice [0.26249027950824505]
  We conduct a systematic comparison of different modelling approaches, across multiple modelling problems, in terms of the key factors likely to affect model choice. Results indicate that the models with the highest disaggregate predictive performance provide poorer estimates of behavioural indicators and aggregate mode shares. It is also observed that the MNL model performs robustly in a variety of situations, though ML techniques can improve the estimates of behavioural indices such as Willingness to Pay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-11T11:10:32Z)
• Bayesian Networks for the robust and unbiased prediction of depression and its symptoms utilizing speech and multimodal data [65.28160163774274]
  We apply a Bayesian framework to capture the relationships between depression, depression symptoms, and features derived from speech, facial expression and cognitive game data collected at thymia.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T14:48:13Z)
• Cross-model Fairness: Empirical Study of Fairness and Ethics Under Model Multiplicity [10.144058870887061]
  We argue that individuals can be harmed when one predictor is chosen ad hoc from a group of equally well performing models. Our findings suggest that such unfairness can be readily found in real life and it may be difficult to mitigate by technical means alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T14:33:39Z)
• CSDI: Conditional Score-based Diffusion Models for Probabilistic Time Series Imputation [107.63407690972139]
  Conditional Score-based Diffusion models for Imputation (CSDI) is a novel time series imputation method that utilizes score-based diffusion models conditioned on observed data. CSDI improves by 40-70% over existing probabilistic imputation methods on popular performance metrics. In addition, C reduces the error by 5-20% compared to the state-of-the-art deterministic imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T22:20:24Z)
• A comprehensive comparative evaluation and analysis of Distributional Semantic Models [61.41800660636555]
  We perform a comprehensive evaluation of type distributional vectors, either produced by static DSMs or obtained by averaging the contextualized vectors generated by BERT. The results show that the alleged superiority of predict based models is more apparent than real, and surely not ubiquitous. We borrow from cognitive neuroscience the methodology of Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) to inspect the semantic spaces generated by distributional models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T15:18:06Z)
• Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labels [69.64662540443162]
  We develop a framework for characterizing predictive fairness properties over the set of models that deliver similar overall performance. We provide tractable algorithms to compute the range of attainable group-level predictive disparities. We extend our framework to address the empirically relevant challenge of selectively labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:11:37Z)
• A General Framework for Survival Analysis and Multi-State Modelling [70.31153478610229]
  We use neural ordinary differential equations as a flexible and general method for estimating multi-state survival models. We show that our model exhibits state-of-the-art performance on popular survival data sets and demonstrate its efficacy in a multi-state setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T19:24:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.