GraphVerse: A Comprehensive Visual Graph Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06769v1
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 03:43:25 GMT
- Title: GraphVerse: A Comprehensive Visual Graph Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models
- Abstract summary: GraphVerse is a benchmark that jointly evaluates perception, visual reasoning, and text-based graph reasoning in MLLMs.<n>At its core is a suite of Graph-centric Image Editing strategies that modify graph images while preserving their semantics.<n>We propose VGR-Score, a process-sensitive metric that evaluates reasoning quality beyond final-answer accuracy.
- Score: 26.945369697013458
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress across diverse vision-language tasks, creating an urgent need for more challenging benchmarks. Yet existing evaluations still provide limited insight into whether these models can truly reason over structured visual information. Visual Graph Reasoning (VGR) offers a compelling testbed for this challenge, requiring models to integrate perception, structural understanding, and multi-step reasoning over graph-based visual inputs. However, prior VGR benchmarks often reduce the task to visual perception followed by text-based reasoning, restrict evaluation to single-image settings, rely on answer-only metrics, and underrepresent realistic graph-centric scenarios. To bridge the gap, we introduce GraphVerse, a unified benchmark that jointly evaluates perception, visual reasoning, and text-based graph reasoning in MLLMs under both single-image and paired-image settings. At its core is a suite of Graph-centric Image Editing (GIE) strategies that modify graph images while preserving their semantics, turning them into active tests of visual reasoning. We further propose VGR-Score, a process-sensitive metric that evaluates reasoning quality beyond final-answer accuracy. Extensive experiments reveal several key limitations of current MLLMs in VGR, while also validating the effectiveness of GIE strategies and the transferability of GraphVerse to broader multimodal reasoning capabilities. The code is available at https://github.com/sunyuanfu/GraphVerse.
Related papers
- Toward Graph-Tokenizing Large Language Models with Reconstructive Graph Instruction Tuning [17.712367049197212]
Key challenge is to align graph data with language spaces so that large language models (LLMs) can better comprehend graphs.<n>GTokenLLMs encode complex structures and lengthy texts into a graph token sequence, and then align them with text tokens via language instructions tuning.<n>Despite their initial success, our information-theoretic analysis reveals that existing GTokenLLMs rely solely on text supervision from language instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T02:26:54Z) - More Images, More Problems? A Controlled Analysis of VLM Failure Modes [80.64323947730905]
Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, yet their proficiency in understanding and reasoning over multiple images remains largely unexplored.<n>We introduce MIMIC, a new benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the multi-image capabilities of LVLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T18:45:13Z) - When Visualizing is the First Step to Reasoning: MIRA, a Benchmark for Visual Chain-of-Thought [118.71264263478083]
We propose MIRA, a new benchmark designed to evaluate models in scenarios where generating intermediate visual images is essential for successful reasoning.<n>We include 546 multimodal problems, annotated with intermediate visual images and final answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-04T18:00:51Z) - SCENIR: Visual Semantic Clarity through Unsupervised Scene Graph Retrieval [1.51422963961219]
We present SCENIR, a Graph Autoencoder-based unsupervised retrieval framework.<n>Our model demonstrates superior performance across metrics and runtime efficiency, outperforming existing vision-based, multimodal, and supervised GNN approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T11:56:09Z) - RefChartQA: Grounding Visual Answer on Chart Images through Instruction Tuning [63.599057862999]
RefChartQA is a novel benchmark that integrates Chart Question Answering (ChartQA) with visual grounding.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that incorporating spatial awareness via grounding improves response accuracy by over 15%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-29T15:50:08Z) - Graph-to-Vision: Multi-graph Understanding and Reasoning using Vision-Language Models [10.813015912529936]
We introduce the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate and enhance the multi-graph reasoning abilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>Our benchmark covers four common graph types-knowledge graphs, flowcharts, mind maps, and route maps-and supports both homogeneous and heterogeneous graph groupings.<n>We evaluate several state-of-the-art VLMs under a multi-dimensional scoring framework that assesses graph parsing, reasoning consistency, and instruction-following accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T12:20:37Z) - Revisiting Graph Neural Networks on Graph-level Tasks: Comprehensive Experiments, Analysis, and Improvements [54.006506479865344]
We propose a unified evaluation framework for graph-level Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)<n>This framework provides a standardized setting to evaluate GNNs across diverse datasets.<n>We also propose a novel GNN model with enhanced expressivity and generalization capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-01T08:48:53Z) - VisGraphVar: A Benchmark Generator for Assessing Variability in Graph Analysis Using Large Vision-Language Models [1.597617022056624]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly capable of tackling abstract visual tasks.
We introduce VisGraphVar, a customizable benchmark generator able to produce graph images for seven task categories.
We show that variations in visual attributes of images (e.g., node labeling and layout) and the deliberate inclusion of visual imperfections significantly affect model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-22T10:10:53Z) - G-Retriever: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Textual Graph Understanding and Question Answering [61.93058781222079]
We develop a flexible question-answering framework targeting real-world textual graphs.
We introduce the first retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach for general textual graphs.
G-Retriever performs RAG over a graph by formulating this task as a Prize-Collecting Steiner Tree optimization problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T13:13:04Z) - GITA: Graph to Visual and Textual Integration for Vision-Language Graph Reasoning [30.23658922980425]
We propose an end-to-end framework, called $textbfG$raph to v$textbfI$sual and $textbfT$extual Integr$textbfA$tion (GITA)
GITA firstly incorporates visual graphs into general graph reasoning.
Experiments on the GVLQA dataset and five real-world datasets show that GITA outperforms mainstream LLMs in terms of general graph reasoning capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-03T12:19:47Z) - Which Modality should I use -- Text, Motif, or Image? : Understanding Graphs with Large Language Models [14.251972223585765]
This paper introduces a new approach to encoding a graph with diverse modalities, such as text, image, and motif, and prompts to approximate a graph's global connectivity.
The study also presents GraphTMI, a novel benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in graph structure analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T12:45:41Z) - Variational Graph Generator for Multi-View Graph Clustering [51.89092260088973]
We propose Variational Graph Generator for Multi-View Graph Clustering (VGMGC)<n>This generator infers a reliable variational consensus graph based on a priori assumption over multiple graphs.<n>It embeds the inferred view-common graph and view-specific graphs together with features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-13T13:19:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.