Investigating the Presence and Development of Student Instructor Preferences in a Large-Scale CS1 Course

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06782v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 04:01:51 GMT
• Title: Investigating the Presence and Development of Student Instructor Preferences in a Large-Scale CS1 Course
• Abstract summary: We utilize data from a novel learning platform that provides students with access to instructional content created by multiple instructors.<n>Examining both initial and final student instructor preferences suggests that preference is a dynamic construct continually shaped by experiences.
• Score: 0.3313576045747071
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Prior research has established the importance of student instructor preferences and identified various influencing factors. However, the dynamics of how student instructor preferences develop and change are less well understood, due to the limitations of common course structures and reliance on one-time measurements. To bridge this gap, we utilize data from a novel learning platform that provides students with access to instructional content created by multiple instructors. This platform enables the quantification of preference emergence and evolution throughout an entire semester, as students repeatedly select content from different instructors. Examining both initial and final student instructor preferences suggests that preference is a dynamic construct continually shaped by experiences. Furthermore, our analysis of the associations between preferences and student characteristics reveals a nuanced picture: while student attributes did not significantly correlate with initial preferences, substantial differences emerged in final preferences across genders and self-reported prior programming experience. This analysis contributes to the existing body of knowledge by expanding our understanding of student instructor preferences and student-instructor relationships in computer science education. We also provide practical insights that institutions and instructors can draw on when multiple instructors collaborate on a course.

Related papers

• Teaching AI Interactively: A Case Study in Higher Education [0.19383897563685792]
  This paper presents a quasi-experimental case study examining the redesign of in-class instructional time in a university-level Introduction to Artificial Intelligence course.<n>Inspired by CS Unplugged approaches, we redesigned the summer offering, integrating embodied, unplugged simulations, collaborative programming labs, and structured reflection.<n>Students in the redesigned course reported higher attendance, stronger agreement that assessments measured their understanding, and greater overall course effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T16:58:19Z)
• Gamification Preferences in Digital Education: The Role of Individual Differences [2.956729394666618]
  This study examines how user characteristics and learning activity types relate to preferences for gamification elements in digital education.<n>Age emerged as the most consistent predictor of preference, followed by player type and personality traits, whereas gender and learning styles showed comparatively weaker associations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T10:19:10Z)
• Disentangling Learning from Judgment: Representation Learning for Open Response Analytics [0.0]
  Open-ended responses are central to learning, yet automated scoring often conflates what students wrote with how teachers grade.<n>We present an analytics-first framework that separates content signals from rater tendencies, making judgments visible and auditable via analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T02:06:28Z)
• Agile and Student-Centred Teaching of Agile/Scrum Concepts [1.52292571922932]
  We discuss our experience in designing and teaching a course on Software Engineering Project Management.<n>The course has undergone fundamental changes since 2020 to make the teaching approach more student-centred and flexible.<n>We report our lessons learned, which might provide useful insights for teaching Agile/Scrum concepts to undergraduate and postgraduate students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T10:09:32Z)
• Representational Alignment Supports Effective Machine Teaching [81.19197059407121]
  GRADE is a new controlled experimental setting to study pedagogy and representational alignment.<n>We find that improved representational alignment with a student improves student learning outcomes.<n>However, this effect is moderated by the size and representational diversity of the class being taught.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:48:24Z)
• Distantly-Supervised Named Entity Recognition with Adaptive Teacher Learning and Fine-grained Student Ensemble [56.705249154629264]
  Self-training teacher-student frameworks are proposed to improve the robustness of NER models. In this paper, we propose an adaptive teacher learning comprised of two teacher-student networks. Fine-grained student ensemble updates each fragment of the teacher model with a temporal moving average of the corresponding fragment of the student, which enhances consistent predictions on each model fragment against noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T12:14:09Z)
• Better Teacher Better Student: Dynamic Prior Knowledge for Knowledge Distillation [70.92135839545314]
  We propose the dynamic prior knowledge (DPK), which integrates part of teacher's features as the prior knowledge before the feature distillation. Our DPK makes the performance of the student model positively correlated with that of the teacher model, which means that we can further boost the accuracy of students by applying larger teachers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T11:52:13Z)
• Generalized Knowledge Distillation via Relationship Matching [53.69235109551099]
  Knowledge of a well-trained deep neural network (a.k.a. the "teacher") is valuable for learning similar tasks. Knowledge distillation extracts knowledge from the teacher and integrates it with the target model. Instead of enforcing the teacher to work on the same task as the student, we borrow the knowledge from a teacher trained from a general label space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T06:49:47Z)
• Learning to Teach with Student Feedback [67.41261090761834]
  Interactive Knowledge Distillation (IKD) allows the teacher to learn to teach from the feedback of the student. IKD trains the teacher model to generate specific soft target at each training step for a certain student. Joint optimization for both teacher and student is achieved by two iterative steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T03:01:01Z)
• Mining Student Responses to Infer Student Satisfaction Predictors [0.966840768820136]
  We predict different levels of student satisfaction and infer the influential predictors related to course and instructor. We present five different aspects of student satisfaction in terms of 1) course content, 2) class participation, 3) achievement of initial expectations about the course, 4) relevancy towards professional development, and 5) if the course connects them and helps to explore the real-world situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T10:31:11Z)
• Neural Multi-Task Learning for Teacher Question Detection in Online Classrooms [50.19997675066203]
  We build an end-to-end neural framework that automatically detects questions from teachers' audio recordings. By incorporating multi-task learning techniques, we are able to strengthen the understanding of semantic relations among different types of questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-16T02:17:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.