Gamification Preferences in Digital Education: The Role of Individual Differences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13267v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 10:19:10 GMT
• Title: Gamification Preferences in Digital Education: The Role of Individual Differences
• Abstract summary: This study examines how user characteristics and learning activity types relate to preferences for gamification elements in digital education.<n>Age emerged as the most consistent predictor of preference, followed by player type and personality traits, whereas gender and learning styles showed comparatively weaker associations.
• Score: 2.956729394666618
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Although personalization is widely advocated in gamified learning, empirical evidence on how learner characteristics and task context shape motivational preferences remains limited. This study examines how user characteristics and learning activity types relate to preferences for gamification elements in digital education. A large-scale quantitative survey (N = 530), including 34% underage participants, assessed preferences for 13 gamification elements in relation to Age, Gender, HEXAD Player Type, Big Five Personality Traits, Felder-Silverman Learning Styles, and Bloom-based Learning Activity Types. Inferential statistical analyses and exploratory machine learning techniques revealed systematic but generally small-to-moderate effects across parameters. Age emerged as the most consistent predictor of preference, followed by player type and personality traits, whereas gender and learning styles showed comparatively weaker associations. In addition, learning activity type significantly influenced the perceived suitability of gamification elements, indicating that motivational design is task-dependent. The findings suggest that gamification effectiveness cannot be reduced to universally motivating elements. Instead, preferences are shaped by the interaction of learner characteristics and instructional context. These results provide empirical grounding for adaptive and modular gamification strategies in digital learning environments.

Related papers

• Investigating the Presence and Development of Student Instructor Preferences in a Large-Scale CS1 Course [0.3313576045747071]
  We utilize data from a novel learning platform that provides students with access to instructional content created by multiple instructors.<n>Examining both initial and final student instructor preferences suggests that preference is a dynamic construct continually shaped by experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-07T04:01:51Z)
• Unveiling the Learning Mind of Language Models: A Cognitive Framework and Empirical Study [45.82081693725339]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across tasks such as mathematics, coding, and reasoning.<n>Yet their learning ability, which is crucial for adapting to dynamic environments and acquiring new knowledge, remains underexplored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T13:24:50Z)
• Student-AI Interaction in an LLM-Empowered Learning Environment: A Cluster Analysis of Engagement Profiles [28.794946431719392]
  This study explored diverse learner profiles within a multi-agent, LLM-empowered learning environment.<n>Students exhibit varied behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement tendencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T16:08:28Z)
• Adaptive Language-Guided Abstraction from Contrastive Explanations [53.48583372522492]
  It is necessary to determine which features of the environment are relevant before determining how these features should be used to compute reward. End-to-end methods for joint feature and reward learning often yield brittle reward functions that are sensitive to spurious state features. This paper describes a method named ALGAE which alternates between using language models to iteratively identify human-meaningful features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T16:51:58Z)
• Educational Customization by Homogenous Grouping of e-Learners based on their Learning Styles [0.4915744683251149]
  We propose using the Felder-Silverman model, which is based on learning styles, to group similar learners. By identifying the learning styles of the learners, co-like learning groups are formed, and each group receives adaptive content based on their preferences, needs, talents, and abilities. In terms of "educational success," the weighted average score of the experimental group is 17.65 out of 20, while the control group achieves a score of 12.6 out of 20.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T14:06:42Z)
• Improved Performances and Motivation in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Combining Machine Learning and Learner Choice [17.558814050941677]
  Large class sizes challenge personalized learning in schools.<n>We present an AI-driven personalization system, called ZPDES.<n>It sequences exercises that maximize learning progress for each student.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T13:41:00Z)
• Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Prompting [64.80538055623842]
  sociodemographic prompting is a technique that steers the output of prompt-based models towards answers that humans with specific sociodemographic profiles would give. We show that sociodemographic information affects model predictions and can be beneficial for improving zero-shot learning in subjective NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T15:42:06Z)
• Personalization, Cognition, and Gamification-based Programming Language Learning: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Literature Review [0.13053649021965597]
  Programming courses in computing science are important because they are often the first introduction to computer programming for many students. The current teacher-lecturer model of learning commonly employed in university lecture halls often results in a lack of motivation and participation in learning. This paper provides insights into designing and implementing effective personalized gamification interventions in programming courses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T05:14:23Z)
• A Matter of Annotation: An Empirical Study on In Situ and Self-Recall Activity Annotations from Wearable Sensors [56.554277096170246]
  We present an empirical study that evaluates and contrasts four commonly employed annotation methods in user studies focused on in-the-wild data collection. For both the user-driven, in situ annotations, where participants annotate their activities during the actual recording process, and the recall methods, where participants retrospectively annotate their data at the end of each day, the participants had the flexibility to select their own set of activity classes and corresponding labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T16:02:56Z)
• Dataset Bias in Human Activity Recognition [57.91018542715725]
  This contribution statistically curates the training data to assess to what degree the physical characteristics of humans influence HAR performance. We evaluate the performance of a state-of-the-art convolutional neural network on two HAR datasets that vary in the sensors, activities, and recording for time-series HAR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T12:33:50Z)
• Tyger: Task-Type-Generic Active Learning for Molecular Property Prediction [121.97742787439546]
  How to accurately predict the properties of molecules is an essential problem in AI-driven drug discovery. To reduce annotation cost, deep Active Learning methods are developed to select only the most representative and informative data for annotating. We propose a Task-type-generic active learning framework (termed Tyger) that is able to handle different types of learning tasks in a unified manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T12:56:12Z)
• Measuring Fairness Under Unawareness of Sensitive Attributes: A Quantification-Based Approach [131.20444904674494]
  We tackle the problem of measuring group fairness under unawareness of sensitive attributes. We show that quantification approaches are particularly suited to tackle the fairness-under-unawareness problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-17T13:45:46Z)
• Mind Your Outliers! Investigating the Negative Impact of Outliers on Active Learning for Visual Question Answering [71.15403434929915]
  We show that across 5 models and 4 datasets on the task of visual question answering, a wide variety of active learning approaches fail to outperform random selection. We identify the problem as collective outliers -- groups of examples that active learning methods prefer to acquire but models fail to learn. We show that active learning sample efficiency increases significantly as the number of collective outliers in the active learning pool decreases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-06T00:52:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.