CoCoNav: Conformal Control for Safe Robot Navigation in Crowds

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07751v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 20:34:52 GMT
• Title: CoCoNav: Conformal Control for Safe Robot Navigation in Crowds
• Abstract summary: We propose textitCoNav, a crowd-navigation framework that combines online conformal calibration with runtime-certified planning.<n>A horizon-specific conformal proportional--integral controller adapts trajectory-error bounds to regulate long-run empirical coverage.<n>A textitrelax-then-verify planner preserves solver feasibility by generating nominal trajectories with soft-constrained MPC.
• Score: 12.172167017799502
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Safe and efficient robot navigation in crowds requires anticipating pedestrian motion despite uncertain and potentially shifting prediction errors. Existing reactive methods can produce oscillatory behavior, while predictive planners often treat forecasts as exact or rely on restrictive error models. Incorporating conservative uncertainty sets as hard constraints can also render model predictive control (MPC) infeasible. We propose \textit{CoCoNav}, a crowd-navigation framework that combines online conformal calibration with runtime-certified planning. A horizon-specific conformal proportional--integral controller adapts trajectory-error bounds to regulate long-run empirical coverage, enabling the framework to respond to changing prediction errors. A \textit{relax-then-verify} planner preserves solver feasibility by generating nominal trajectories with soft-constrained MPC and separately certifying them, together with contingency maneuvers, against the calibrated bounds before execution. Simulations and quadruped experiments show that CoCoNav achieves a favorable balance among collision avoidance, task success, and navigation efficiency relative to the evaluated baselines.

Related papers

• Nonlinear Model Predictive Control via Sequential Convex Programming for Drone-to-Drone Docking [0.0]
  This work formulates the docking task as a finite-horizon optimal control problem based on a reduced-order nonlinear model augmented with disturbance states.<n>The resulting problem is solved using sequential convex programming within a receding-horizon framework to generate dynamically feasible docking trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T06:27:45Z)
• AI-Augmented Model Predictive Control for Safe and Adaptive Rendezvous and Proximity Operations [2.787067333542931]
  This work presents an adaptive Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework for autonomous spacecraft RPO in multi-agent adversarial scenarios.<n>The framework was evaluated in the official Kerbal Space Program Differential Game (KSPDG) Capture-the-Satellite environment through Monte Carlo simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-18T04:20:23Z)
• From Prediction Uncertainty to Conformalized Distance Fields for Safe Motion Planning [9.50741434664352]
  Existing conformal approaches conformalize a scalar score that aggregates per-obstacle prediction errors.<n>We instead conformalize the entire predicted distance field at once.<n>This functional conformal prediction framework yields a distribution-free, field-level lower bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T11:02:51Z)
• GroundControl: Anticipating Navigation Failures in Vision-Language Agents via Trajectory-Consistent Uncertainty Estimates [3.7267095596919053]
  Vision-language navigation agents achieve competitive average success on benchmark tasks, yet failures often arise through predictable trajectory-level breakdowns.<n>Reliable deployment requires uncertainty signals that anticipate emerging failure dynamics during execution rather than reflect only instantaneous action entropy.<n>We introduce emphGroundControl, a trajectory-consistent uncertainty estimator defined as statistical deviation from nominal goal-directed distance-to-goal dynamics aggregated over an episode.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T16:56:20Z)
• Action-Conditioned Risk Gating for Safety-Critical Control under Partial Observability [79.08785366532287]
  We propose a lightweight risk-gated reinforcement learning approximation for risk-sensitive control under partial observability.<n>We evaluate the approach in two safety-critical partially observable domains: automated glucose regulation and safety-constrained navigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T01:23:09Z)
• PnP-Corrector: A Universal Correction Framework for Coupled Spatiotemporal Forecasting [62.22445401483844]
  Existing methods are severely constrained by the bottleneck of compounding errors.<n>We propose a universal framework called -Cast-Corrector (Plug-and-Play Corrector)<n>Our method significantly enhances the long-term stability of coupled forecasting systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T13:12:33Z)
• Response-Aware Risk-Constrained Control Barrier Function With Application to Vehicles [0.0]
  This paper proposes a unified control framework based on Response-Aware Risk-Constrained Control Barrier Function for dynamic safety boundary control of vehicles.<n>The framework fuses nominal dynamics priors with direct vehicle body responses to provide a baseline direction for control gradients.<n>It also reformulates traditional deterministic safety constraints into probabilistic constraints on the tail risk of barrier function derivatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T02:38:17Z)
• Gaussian Mixture-Based Inverse Perception Contract for Uncertainty-Aware Robot Navigation [14.159772216001954]
  An inverse perception contract (IPC) provides such a connection by mapping estimates to sets that contain the ground truth with high confidence.<n>We introduce Gaussian Mixture-based Inverse Perception Contract (GM-IPC), which extends IPC to represent uncertainty with unions of ellipsoidal confidence sets.<n>We show that the resulting uncertainty characterizations can be leveraged in downstream planning frameworks for real-time safe navigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T17:48:18Z)
• Centaur: Robust End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Test-Time Training [84.78837437133234]
  We propose Centaur, which updates a planner's behavior via test-time training without relying on hand-engineered rules or cost functions.<n>We develop a novel uncertainty measure, called Cluster Entropy, which is simple, interpretable, and compatible with state-of-the-art planning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T17:59:41Z)
• Model Predictive Control with Gaussian-Process-Supported Dynamical Constraints for Autonomous Vehicles [82.65261980827594]
  We propose a model predictive control approach for autonomous vehicles that exploits learned Gaussian processes for predicting human driving behavior. A multi-mode predictive control approach considers the possible intentions of the human drivers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T17:14:57Z)
• Control-Aware Prediction Objectives for Autonomous Driving [78.19515972466063]
  We present control-aware prediction objectives (CAPOs) to evaluate the downstream effect of predictions on control without requiring the planner be differentiable. We propose two types of importance weights that weight the predictive likelihood: one using an attention model between agents, and another based on control variation when exchanging predicted trajectories for ground truth trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T07:37:21Z)
• Learning Control Barrier Functions from Expert Demonstrations [69.23675822701357]
  We propose a learning based approach to safe controller synthesis based on control barrier functions (CBFs) We analyze an optimization-based approach to learning a CBF that enjoys provable safety guarantees under suitable Lipschitz assumptions on the underlying dynamical system. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results that learn provably safe control barrier functions from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T12:29:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.