When Is a General Factor Distinguishable? Non-Proportionality, Stable Structure, and the Bifactor Decision

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10731v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:46:15 GMT
• Title: When Is a General Factor Distinguishable? Non-Proportionality, Stable Structure, and the Bifactor Decision
• Abstract summary: Distinguishability is graded, measured by the population distance to the $K$-factor class.<n>Four empirical datasets illustrate the possible outcomes.
• Score: 2.1494179586067537
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Whether an additional general dimension is necessary beyond correlated first-order factors is a property of the population covariance matrix, not of any estimator or design. This research establishes when that property can be decided. Where the general and group loadings are proportional within every cluster the bifactor structure is covariance-equivalent to correlated factors, so no sample size separates them (Proposition 1); where that proportionality fails in every cluster, three items per cluster and some mild regularities leave no $K$-factor model with diagonal uniquenesses able to reproduce the covariance matrix (Theorem 1); and between them lies a mixed boundary, located numerically here and turning on cluster resistance. Distinguishability is therefore graded, measured by the population distance to the $K$-factor class. Because that question is conditional on a first-order structure which is itself uncertain, a two-step procedure is developed within partially exploratory factor analysis, delivering a structure only when it reproduces across adjacent counts and treating non-delivery as legitimate. Simulation shows that a unanimous count can accompany a structure that fails to reproduce, and that absorbed local dependence can imitate a general factor, the error growing with sample size while stability indicators stay clean. Four empirical datasets illustrate the possible outcomes.

Related papers

• Causal inference for group-contaminated structured outcomes: observable quotients, lossless reduction and exact randomization inference [0.0]
  We study the unrestricted observation model X = .<n>Y(A) and characterize its observable information.<n>A quotient-faithful reconstruction theorem shows quotient reduction is sufficient for the full transformed experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T11:39:50Z)
• The Resolution of Causal Heterogeneity [5.222979968110479]
  Causal subgroup analyses often report a small number of groups summarizing treatment effect heterogeneity, as if that number were a well-defined estimand.<n>We replace it with a new population estimand, the resolution profile, a functional of the causal feature law.<n>Inference is organized around one cross-fitted Bayesian-bootstrap posterior for a single structured moment process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-19T14:56:06Z)
• Topological Ignorability for Structural Causal Effects Beyond Means [0.0]
  Interventions alter the structure of an outcome distribution rather than its mean.<n>Mean-based causal estimands such as the average treatment effect may miss important structural effects.<n>We introduce topological-geometrical causal metrics based on summaries of interventional outcome laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-31T11:56:53Z)
• Distributional Equivalence in Linear Non-Gaussian Latent-Variable Cyclic Causal Models: Characterization and Learning [13.891913455492697]
  We argue that a core obstacle to a general, structural-assumption-free approach is the lack of an equivalence characterization.<n>Key to our approach is a new tool, edge rank constraints, which fills a missing piece in the toolbox for latent-variable causal discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T03:57:14Z)
• Transformers learn factored representations [62.86679034549244]
  Transformers pretrained via next token prediction learn to factor their world into parts.<n>We formalize two representational hypotheses: (1) a representation in the product space of all factors, whose dimension grows exponentially with the number of parts.<n>We derive precise predictions about the geometric structure of activations for each, including the number of subspaces, their dimensionality, and the arrangement of context embeddings within them.<n>This provides a principled explanation for why transformers decompose the world into parts, and suggests that interpretable low dimensional structure may persist even in models trained on complex data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T17:49:06Z)
• Identification of Causal Direction under an Arbitrary Number of Latent Confounders [54.76982125821112]
  In real-world scenarios, observed variables may be affected by multiple latent variables simultaneously.<n>We make use of the joint higher-order cumulant matrix of the observed variables constructed in a specific way.<n>We show that, surprisingly, causal asymmetry between two observed variables can be directly seen from the rank deficiency properties of such higher-order cumulant matrices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T15:10:00Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Score-based Causal Representation Learning with Interventions [54.735484409244386]
  This paper studies the causal representation learning problem when latent causal variables are observed indirectly. The objectives are: (i) recovering the unknown linear transformation (up to scaling) and (ii) determining the directed acyclic graph (DAG) underlying the latent variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T18:39:48Z)
• Disentanglement of Correlated Factors via Hausdorff Factorized Support [53.23740352226391]
  We propose a relaxed disentanglement criterion - the Hausdorff Factorized Support (HFS) criterion - that encourages a factorized support, rather than a factorial distribution. We show that the use of HFS consistently facilitates disentanglement and recovery of ground-truth factors across a variety of correlation settings and benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T20:46:42Z)
• A Distance Covariance-based Kernel for Nonlinear Causal Clustering in Heterogeneous Populations [1.2763567932588586]
  We introduce a distance covariance-based kernel designed specifically to measure the similarity between the underlying nonlinear causal structures of different samples. This kernel enables us to perform clustering to identify the homogeneous subpopulations. We demonstrate using our kernel for causal clustering with an application in genetics, allowing us to reason about the latent transcription factor networks regulating measured gene expression levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T10:16:34Z)
• CausalVAE: Structured Causal Disentanglement in Variational Autoencoder [52.139696854386976]
  The framework of variational autoencoder (VAE) is commonly used to disentangle independent factors from observations. We propose a new VAE based framework named CausalVAE, which includes a Causal Layer to transform independent factors into causal endogenous ones. Results show that the causal representations learned by CausalVAE are semantically interpretable, and their causal relationship as a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) is identified with good accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-18T20:09:34Z)
• A Critical View of the Structural Causal Model [89.43277111586258]
  We show that one can identify the cause and the effect without considering their interaction at all. We propose a new adversarial training method that mimics the disentangled structure of the causal model. Our multidimensional method outperforms the literature methods on both synthetic and real world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T22:52:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.