Topological Ignorability for Structural Causal Effects Beyond Means

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01184v2
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:19:17 GMT
• Title: Topological Ignorability for Structural Causal Effects Beyond Means
• Abstract summary: Interventions alter the structure of an outcome distribution rather than its mean.<n>Mean-based causal estimands such as the average treatment effect may miss important structural effects.<n>We introduce topological-geometrical causal metrics based on summaries of interventional outcome laws.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Many interventions alter the structure of an outcome distribution rather than its mean: they can split a population into disconnected regimes, create loops or holes, generate branches, or reorganize an outcome cloud while leaving the average response nearly unchanged. In such settings, mean-based causal estimands such as the average treatment effect may miss important structural effects. We introduce topological-geometrical causal metrics based on summaries of interventional outcome laws, including density-superlevel Betti summaries, Euler signatures, and persistent-homology summaries. These metrics quantify structural differences between treated and untreated outcome laws beyond averages. We also study the assumptions needed for causal interpretation. We introduce topological ignorability, a topological analogue of conditional ignorability that requires invariance of the chosen structural feature rather than the full counterfactual distribution. When the chosen summary is injective, this condition coincides with weak ignorability; for noninjective summaries, it can identify the structural feature of interest without identifying the full interventional law. We define a covariate-standardized topological-geometrical causal effect and develop practical estimators. We validate the framework in two hidden-confounding benchmarks: a fully synthetic exact benchmark and a real-covariate semi-synthetic benchmark using Wisconsin breast-cancer covariates. In both, weak ignorability fails and balancing observed covariates nearly eliminates standardized mean differences, yet the coordinate-mean average treatment effect remains biased. By contrast, selected finite density-superlevel Betti and Euler contrasts remain stable across oracle, observational, and weighted analyses.

Related papers

• When Is a General Factor Distinguishable? Non-Proportionality, Stable Structure, and the Bifactor Decision [2.1494179586067537]
  Distinguishability is graded, measured by the population distance to the $K$-factor class.<n>Four empirical datasets illustrate the possible outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T09:46:15Z)
• Adversarial Causal Intervention Falsification [0.0]
  We study a sequential game in which a structural causal generator proposes observational and interventional distributions.<n>An adversarial experimentalist selects interventions intended to maximally falsify the generator.<n>The discriminator is indexed by an intervention and tests whether the generator reproduces the corresponding post-intervention law.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T20:01:26Z)
• A Mathematical Framework for Topological Causal Data Analysis [5.8010446129208155]
  We introduce emphTopological Causal Data Analysis, a framework separating the observation space, causal-model class, topological representation, and causal query.<n>Topology does not define interventions; it supplies stable, shape-sensitive summaries after causal assumptions have been specified.<n>At the distribution level, we identify targets through the standard causal (g)-formula and derive stability-transfer bounds and plug-in consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T13:02:11Z)
• The Resolution of Causal Heterogeneity [5.222979968110479]
  Causal subgroup analyses often report a small number of groups summarizing treatment effect heterogeneity, as if that number were a well-defined estimand.<n>We replace it with a new population estimand, the resolution profile, a functional of the causal feature law.<n>Inference is organized around one cross-fitted Bayesian-bootstrap posterior for a single structured moment process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-19T14:56:06Z)
• The conditional-mean barrier: From deterministic regression to conditional distribution learning [6.160113667162026]
  This tutorial develops a self-contained module centered on the conditional-mean barrier.<n>Adding latent randomness to a squared-loss predictor collapses it back to the conditional mean.<n>We briefly organize common distributional objectives, including negative log-likelihood, moment and observable matching, variational objectives, adversarial divergences, and score matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T07:31:42Z)
• Out of Context: Reliability in Multimodal Anomaly Detection Requires Contextual Inference [54.774686416991386]
  We argue that multimodal anomaly detection should be reframed as a cross-modal contextual inference problem.<n>This perspective has implications for model design, evaluation protocols, and benchmark construction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T19:32:55Z)
• Beyond Means: Topological Causal Effects under Persistent-Homology Ignorability [0.0]
  A canonical failure mode occurs when control outcomes are unimodal, treated outcomes become bimodal, and both distributions have the same mean.<n>This paper develops a topological causal framework based on persistent homology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-15T01:03:32Z)
• Scalable Contrastive Causal Discovery under Unknown Soft Interventions [3.165716101116899]
  We propose a scalable causal discovery model for paired observational and interventional settings with shared underlying causal structure and unknown soft interventions.<n> Experiments on synthetic data demonstrate improved causal structure recovery, generalization to unseen graphs with held-out causal mechanisms, and scalability to larger graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T18:16:16Z)
• Lost in Aggregation: The Causal Interpretation of the IV Estimand [5.51741499241756]
  We show that the causal effect of an aggregate treatment is generally ambiguous, as it depends on how interventions on the aggregate are instantiated.<n>We then characterize conditions on the interventional distribution and the aggregate setting under which standard instrumental variable estimators identify the aggregate effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T17:43:45Z)
• When Are Learning Biases Equivalent? A Unifying Framework for Fairness, Robustness, and Distribution Shift [0.0]
  Machine learning systems exhibit diverse failure modes: unfairness toward protected groups, brittleness to spurious correlations, poor performance on minority sub-populations.<n>We propose a unifying theoretical framework that characterizes when different bias mechanisms produce quantitatively equivalent effects on model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-09T20:48:09Z)
• Identification of Causal Direction under an Arbitrary Number of Latent Confounders [54.76982125821112]
  In real-world scenarios, observed variables may be affected by multiple latent variables simultaneously.<n>We make use of the joint higher-order cumulant matrix of the observed variables constructed in a specific way.<n>We show that, surprisingly, causal asymmetry between two observed variables can be directly seen from the rank deficiency properties of such higher-order cumulant matrices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T15:10:00Z)
• Identifiable Latent Neural Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
  Causal representation learning seeks to uncover latent, high-level causal representations from low-level observed data. We determine the types of distribution shifts that do contribute to the identifiability of causal representations. We translate our findings into a practical algorithm, allowing for the acquisition of reliable latent causal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T04:13:55Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Entropy Regularization [78.16196949641079]
  In structured prediction, the goal is to jointly predict many output variables that together encode a structured object. One approach -- entropy regularization -- posits that decision boundaries should lie in low-probability regions. We propose a loss, neuro-symbolic entropy regularization, that encourages the model to confidently predict a valid object.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T06:23:10Z)
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap [140.98628848491146]
  We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:50:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.