The Resolution of Causal Heterogeneity
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17280v1
- Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:56:06 GMT
- Title: The Resolution of Causal Heterogeneity
- Abstract summary: Causal subgroup analyses often report a small number of groups summarizing treatment effect heterogeneity, as if that number were a well-defined estimand.<n>We replace it with a new population estimand, the resolution profile, a functional of the causal feature law.<n>Inference is organized around one cross-fitted Bayesian-bootstrap posterior for a single structured moment process.
- Score: 5.222979968110479
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Causal subgroup analyses often report a small number of groups summarizing treatment effect heterogeneity, as if that number were a well-defined estimand. Outside genuinely latent class populations, however, a ``true'' subgroup count is model dependent rather than a population functional. We replace it with a new population estimand, the resolution profile, a functional of the causal feature law giving the fewest groups explaining a prescribed fraction of causal heterogeneity, defined for every population without latent structure. Inference is organized around one cross-fitted Bayesian-bootstrap posterior for a single structured moment process, its scores corrected with influence functions, so that paths, profiles, fixed-resolution summaries, and subgroup effects follow by composition. A uniform conditional Bernstein--von Mises theorem over a loss class containing the nonsmooth quantization losses shows this posterior merges with the efficient Gaussian limit under stated nuisance-rate and margin conditions. Subgroup-number uncertainty is not model selection but threshold nonregularity, the profile being an integer-valued threshold of a continuous path, discontinuous in the law at each knot. At these knots no single-valued selector is locally uniformly consistent over root-$n$ neighborhoods, and the set-valued report obtained by inverting a simultaneous band retains locally uniform validity over exactly the same perturbations. Simulations support the approximations, and an analysis of the MineThatData e-mail experiment illustrates the resolution-indexed report, in which two to three groups summarize the visit response while finer structure falls below a noise-floor diagnostic.
Related papers
- Characterizing Heterogeneous Rates in Finite Mixture Estimation via Partial Optimal Transport [88.55403215843967]
Voronoi-based partial optimal transport (VPOT) for obtaining refined local and global convergence guarantees for the maximum likelihood estimator of the mixing measure.<n>Results hold in arbitrary fixed dimension without requiring mixing proportions to be uniformly bounded away from zero or prior knowledge of the true number of mixture components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-15T04:32:53Z) - Causal inference for group-contaminated structured outcomes: observable quotients, lossless reduction and exact randomization inference [0.0]
We study the unrestricted observation model X = .<n>Y(A) and characterize its observable information.<n>A quotient-faithful reconstruction theorem shows quotient reduction is sufficient for the full transformed experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-12T11:39:50Z) - When Is a General Factor Distinguishable? Non-Proportionality, Stable Structure, and the Bifactor Decision [2.1494179586067537]
Distinguishability is graded, measured by the population distance to the $K$-factor class.<n>Four empirical datasets illustrate the possible outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-11T09:46:15Z) - How Useful is Causal Invariance for Domain Adaptation in Finite-Sample Settings? [58.740078141879984]
Machine learning models often degrade when they are deployed on a target distribution that differs from the source distributions they were trained on.<n>Recent work in causality-based domain generalization has shown how shared causal structure can induce invariant predictors.<n>In this paper, we study when full or partial causal knowledge can provably improve supervised domain adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-10T21:07:49Z) - Topological Ignorability for Structural Causal Effects Beyond Means [0.0]
Interventions alter the structure of an outcome distribution rather than its mean.<n>Mean-based causal estimands such as the average treatment effect may miss important structural effects.<n>We introduce topological-geometrical causal metrics based on summaries of interventional outcome laws.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-31T11:56:53Z) - The conditional-mean barrier: From deterministic regression to conditional distribution learning [6.160113667162026]
This tutorial develops a self-contained module centered on the conditional-mean barrier.<n>Adding latent randomness to a squared-loss predictor collapses it back to the conditional mean.<n>We briefly organize common distributional objectives, including negative log-likelihood, moment and observable matching, variational objectives, adversarial divergences, and score matching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-27T07:31:42Z) - Partition Function Estimation under Bounded f-Divergence [18.170877027040362]
We study the statistical complexity of estimating partition functions given sample access to a proposal distribution.<n>Our results unify and generalize prior analyses of importance sampling, rejection, sampling, and heavy-tailed mean estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T22:34:36Z) - From Tail Universality to Bernstein-von Mises: A Unified Statistical Theory of Semi-Implicit Variational Inference [0.12183405753834557]
Semi-implicit variational inference (SIVI) constructs approximate posteriors of the form $q() = int k(| z) r(dz)$<n>This paper develops a unified "approximation-optimization-statistics'' theory for such families.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-05T19:26:25Z) - Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown
Interventions [63.1354734978244]
We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables.
Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z) - Optimal Clustering with Bandit Feedback [57.672609011609886]
This paper considers the problem of online clustering with bandit feedback.
It includes a novel stopping rule for sequential testing that circumvents the need to solve any NP-hard weighted clustering problem as its subroutines.
We show through extensive simulations on synthetic and real-world datasets that BOC's performance matches the lower boundally, and significantly outperforms a non-adaptive baseline algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-09T06:05:05Z) - GroupifyVAE: from Group-based Definition to VAE-based Unsupervised
Representation Disentanglement [91.9003001845855]
VAE-based unsupervised disentanglement can not be achieved without introducing other inductive bias.
We address VAE-based unsupervised disentanglement by leveraging the constraints derived from the Group Theory based definition as the non-probabilistic inductive bias.
We train 1800 models covering the most prominent VAE-based models on five datasets to verify the effectiveness of our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-20T09:49:51Z) - Log-Likelihood Ratio Minimizing Flows: Towards Robust and Quantifiable
Neural Distribution Alignment [52.02794488304448]
We propose a new distribution alignment method based on a log-likelihood ratio statistic and normalizing flows.
We experimentally verify that minimizing the resulting objective results in domain alignment that preserves the local structure of input domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-26T22:10:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.