Policy Convergence and Divergence Across National and Within Regional AI Strategies: A Policy Design Element Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11006v2
• Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:31:28 GMT
• Title: Policy Convergence and Divergence Across National and Within Regional AI Strategies: A Policy Design Element Analysis
• Abstract summary: This paper analyzes 74 national and 3 regional AI strategies drawn from a global scan of all 205 UN member and non-member states.<n>Results indicate strong horizontal convergence around economic competitiveness, research support, and ethical AI use.<n>Across the three regions, the AU exhibits the highest vertical convergence, the EU demonstrated strong alignment on regulatory and economic priorities but diverges on human-centric values.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Governments worldwide have responded to the rapid expansion of AI by publishing national and regional AI strategies. Comparing national and regional AI strategies to identify their convergences and divergences can uncover their common practices, understand regional variations, and provide policy designers a comprehensive set of policy design elements for their ongoing AI strategy developments. Yet, existing work has not examined their underlying policy design elements or assessed whether those elements are horizontally (country-to-country) or vertical (region-to-country) converging or diverging over time. This paper addresses that gap by coding and analyzing 74 national and 3 regional AI strategies drawn from a global scan of all 205 UN member and non-member states. The coding used a latent-inductive approach organized around three functional policy design elements: goals, approaches, and principles. Two research questions guided the analysis: to what degree are national AI strategies becoming horizontally convergent or divergent over time; and to what degree are national strategies becoming vertically convergent or divergent with those countries' regional AI strategy. Results indicate strong horizontal convergence around economic competitiveness, research support, and ethical AI use, alongside persistent divergence in human rights goals, participatory governance approaches, and human-centric principles. Across the three regions, the AU exhibits the highest vertical convergence, the EU demonstrated strong alignment on regulatory and economic priorities but diverges on human-centric values, and the Nordic-Baltic Region displays mixed vertical convergence. These findings offer policy designers a comprehensive evidence base for identifying emerging AI policy design choice norms as AI strategies are developed and updated.

Related papers

• Beyond Rational Illusion: Behaviorally Realistic Strategic Classification [56.458581740660236]
  We propose the Prospect-Guided Strategic Framework (Pro-SF) to address the behaviorally realistic strategic classification problem.<n>Pro-SF is a principled framework grounded in prospect theory to model and learn under behaviorally realistic strategic responses.<n> Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets establish Pro-SF as a behaviorally grounded approach to strategic classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T11:04:55Z)
• Europe and the Geopolitics of AGI: The Need for a Preparedness Plan [13.751000197432546]
  Artificial general intelligence (AGI) systems match or exceed humans at most economically useful cognitive work.<n>This paper examines three questions: how soon AGI might emerge, how it could reshape geopolitics, and whether Europe is adequately prepared.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T15:00:29Z)
• Brokerage in the Black Box: Swing States, Strategic Ambiguity, and the Global Politics of AI Governance [0.0]
  The U.S. - China rivalry has placed frontier dual-use technologies, particularly Artificial Intelligence, at the center of global power dynamics.<n>Existing research, yet, mostly emphasizes superpower strategies and often overlooks the role of middle powers as autonomous actors shaping the techno-order.<n>This study examines Technological Swing States (TSS), middle powers with both technological capacity and strategic flexibility, and their ability to navigate the frontier technologies' uncertainty and opacity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T03:19:48Z)
• From Vision to Validation: A Theory- and Data-Driven Construction of a GCC-Specific AI Adoption Index [0.21485350418225244]
  This study employs a theory-driven foundation derived from an in-depth analysis of literature review and six National AI Strategies (NASs)<n>The research develops and validates a novel AI Adoption Index specifically tailored to the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) public sector.<n>Findings indicate that robust technical infrastructure and clear policy mandates exert the strongest influence on successful AI implementations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T20:06:57Z)
• Advancing Science- and Evidence-based AI Policy [163.43609502905707]
  This paper tackles the problem of how to optimize the relationship between evidence and policy to address the opportunities and challenges of AI.<n>An increasing number of efforts address this problem by often either (i) contributing research into the risks of AI and their effective mitigation or (ii) advocating for policy to address these risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T23:20:58Z)
• Strategic Alignment Patterns in National AI Policies [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel visual mapping methodology for assessing strategic alignment in national artificial intelligence policies.<n>We analyze 15-20 national AI strategies using a combination of matrix-based visualization and network analysis to identify patterns of alignment and misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T18:36:30Z)
• Resource Rational Contractualism Should Guide AI Alignment [69.07915246220985]
  Contractualist alignment proposes grounding decisions in agreements that diverse stakeholders would endorse.<n>We propose Resource-Rationalism: a framework where AI systems approximate the agreements rational parties would form.<n>An RRC-aligned agent would not only operate efficiently, but also be equipped to dynamically adapt to and interpret the ever-changing human social world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T18:57:13Z)
• EPO: Explicit Policy Optimization for Strategic Reasoning in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [69.55982246413046]
  We propose explicit policy optimization (EPO) for strategic reasoning.<n>We train the strategic reasoning model via multi-turn reinforcement learning (RL),utilizing process rewards and iterative self-play.<n>Our findings reveal various collaborative reasoning mechanisms emergent in EPO and its effectiveness in generating novel strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T03:15:55Z)
• Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment [109.57781720848669]
  We argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI.<n>We introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• AI Federalism: Shaping AI Policy within States in Germany [0.0]
  Recent AI governance research has focused heavily on the analysis of strategy papers and ethics guidelines for AI published by national governments and international bodies. Subnational institutions have also published documents on Artificial Intelligence, yet these have been largely absent from policy analyses. This is surprising because AI is connected to many policy areas, such as economic or research policy, where the competences are already distributed between the national and subnational level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-28T16:06:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.