From Vision to Validation: A Theory- and Data-Driven Construction of a GCC-Specific AI Adoption Index
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05474v3
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:42:03 GMT
- Title: From Vision to Validation: A Theory- and Data-Driven Construction of a GCC-Specific AI Adoption Index
- Authors: Mohammad Rashed Albous, Abdel Latef Anouze,
- Abstract summary: This study employs a theory-driven foundation derived from an in-depth analysis of literature review and six National AI Strategies (NASs)<n>The research develops and validates a novel AI Adoption Index specifically tailored to the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) public sector.<n>Findings indicate that robust technical infrastructure and clear policy mandates exert the strongest influence on successful AI implementations.
- Score: 0.21485350418225244
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming public-sector processes worldwide, yet standardized measures rarely address the unique drivers, governance models, and cultural nuances of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. This study employs a theory-driven foundation derived from an in-depth analysis of literature review and six National AI Strategies (NASs), coupled with a data-driven approach that utilizes a survey of 203 mid- and senior-level government employees and advanced statistical techniques (K-Means clustering, Principal Component Analysis, and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling). By combining policy insights with empirical evidence, the research develops and validates a novel AI Adoption Index specifically tailored to the GCC public sector. Findings indicate that robust technical infrastructure and clear policy mandates exert the strongest influence on successful AI implementations, overshadowing organizational readiness in early adoption stages. The combined model explains 70% of the variance in AI outcomes, suggesting that resource-rich environments and top-down policy directives can drive rapid but uneven technology uptake. By consolidating key dimensions (Technical Infrastructure (TI), Organizational Readiness (OR), and Governance Environment (GE)) into a single composite index, this study provides a holistic yet context-sensitive tool for benchmarking AI maturity. The index offers actionable guidance for policymakers seeking to harmonize large-scale deployments with ethical and regulatory standards. Beyond advancing academic discourse, these insights inform more strategic allocation of resources, cross-country cooperation, and capacity-building initiatives, thereby supporting sustained AI-driven transformation in the GCC region and beyond.
Related papers
- An AI Implementation Science Study to Improve Trustworthy Data in a Large Healthcare System [1.6881002551798014]
This study presents an AI implementation case study within Shriners Childrens (SCs), a large multisite pediatric system.<n>We introduce a Python-based data quality assessment tool compatible with SCs infrastructure, extending OHDsi's R/Java-based Data Quality Dashboard.<n>We also compare systematic and case-specific AI implementation strategies for Craniofacial Microsomia (CFM) using the FHIR standard.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T14:21:16Z) - Chitchat with AI: Understand the supply chain carbon disclosure of companies worldwide through Large Language Model [0.998186654331176]
The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) hosts the world's largest longitudinal dataset of climate-related survey responses.<n>This paper proposes a novel decision-support framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to assess corporate climate disclosure quality at scale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-26T01:06:18Z) - A Data-Driven Framework for Digital Transformation in Smart Cities: Integrating AI, Dashboards, and IoT Readiness [0.5390835285335905]
This study proposes an innovative methodology to evaluate the level of digital transformation (DT) in public sector organizations.<n>The proposed approach combines traditional assessment methods with Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques.<n>Our approach has been applied to a real-world case study involving local public administrations in the Valencian Community (Spain)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T21:39:40Z) - Strategic Alignment Patterns in National AI Policies [0.0]
This paper introduces a novel visual mapping methodology for assessing strategic alignment in national artificial intelligence policies.<n>We analyze 15-20 national AI strategies using a combination of matrix-based visualization and network analysis to identify patterns of alignment and misalignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T18:36:30Z) - The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z) - Bottom-Up Perspectives on AI Governance: Insights from User Reviews of AI Products [0.0]
This study adopts a bottom-up approach to explore how governance-relevant themes are expressed in user discourse.<n> Drawing on over 100,000 user reviews of AI products from G2.com, we apply BERTopic to extract latent themes and identify those most semantically related to AI governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T01:33:21Z) - Enterprise Architecture as a Dynamic Capability for Scalable and Sustainable Generative AI adoption: Bridging Innovation and Governance in Large Organisations [55.2480439325792]
Generative Artificial Intelligence is a powerful new technology with the potential to boost innovation and reshape governance in many industries.<n>However, organisations face major challenges in scaling GenAI, including technology complexity, governance gaps and resource misalignments.<n>This study explores how Enterprise Architecture Management can meet the complex requirements of GenAI adoption within large enterprises.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-09T07:41:33Z) - Edge-Cloud Collaborative Computing on Distributed Intelligence and Model Optimization: A Survey [58.50944604905037]
Edge-cloud collaborative computing (ECCC) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for addressing the computational demands of modern intelligent applications.<n>Recent advancements in AI, particularly deep learning and large language models (LLMs), have dramatically enhanced the capabilities of these distributed systems.<n>This survey provides a structured tutorial on fundamental architectures, enabling technologies, and emerging applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-03T13:55:38Z) - AI-Enabled Knowledge Sharing for Enhanced Collaboration and Decision-Making in Non-Profit Healthcare Organizations: A Scoping Review Protocol [0.0]
This protocol outlines a scoping review designed to systematically map the existing body of evidence on AI-enabled knowledge sharing in non-profit healthcare organizations.<n>The review aims to investigate how such technologies enhance collaboration and decision-making, particularly in the context of reduced external support following the cessation of USAID operations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-10T17:09:12Z) - A Survey on Post-training of Large Language Models [185.51013463503946]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing, making them indispensable across domains ranging from conversational systems to scientific exploration.<n>These challenges necessitate advanced post-training language models (PoLMs) to address shortcomings, such as restricted reasoning capacities, ethical uncertainties, and suboptimal domain-specific performance.<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of PoLMs, systematically tracing their evolution across five core paradigms: Fine-tuning, which enhances task-specific accuracy; Alignment, which ensures ethical coherence and alignment with human preferences; Reasoning, which advances multi-step inference despite challenges in reward design; Integration and Adaptation, which
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T05:41:42Z) - An evidence-based methodology for human rights impact assessment (HRIA) in the development of AI data-intensive systems [49.1574468325115]
We show that human rights already underpin the decisions in the field of data use.
This work presents a methodology and a model for a Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA)
The proposed methodology is tested in concrete case-studies to prove its feasibility and effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-30T16:27:52Z) - A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [51.26815896167173]
We present a comprehensive tertiary analysis of PAMI reviews along three complementary dimensions.<n>Our analyses reveal distinctive organizational patterns as well as persistent gaps in current review practices.<n>Finally, our evaluation of state-of-the-art AI-generated reviews indicates encouraging advances in coherence and organization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z) - AI in Supply Chain Risk Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis [0.0]
This study examines 1,903 articles from Google Scholar and Web of Science, with 54 studies selected through PRISMA guidelines.<n>Our findings reveal that ML models, including Random Forest, XGBoost, and hybrid approaches, significantly enhance risk prediction accuracy and adaptability in post-pandemic contexts.<n>The study underscores the necessity of dynamic strategies, interdisciplinary collaboration, and continuous model evaluation to address challenges such as data quality and interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-12T17:47:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.