Multiclass Sentiment Analysis for Identifying Political Viewpoints

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11049v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:21:23 GMT
• Title: Multiclass Sentiment Analysis for Identifying Political Viewpoints
• Abstract summary: We investigate multiclass sentiment analysis of political view- points on social media.<n>We design and evaluate two machine-learning approaches based on XGBoost and BERT.<n>The experimental results show that the XGBoost model reaches an F1-score of 0.2835 and the BERT-based model reaches an F1-score of 0.2806 on the test set.
• Score: 7.5332488078934015
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid growth of social media has created vast amounts of political discourse, which provides valuable opportunities to analyze public opinions and identify different political perspectives. Sentiment Analysis (SA) is a core task in Natural Language Processing (NLP) that allows the computational study of attitudes and opinions in textual data, and has become increasingly important for understanding political discourse. In this work, we investigate multiclass sentiment analysis of political view- points on social media, that is to automatically discriminate multiple sentiment classes over political issues and figures. To solve this task we design and evaluate two machine-learning approaches based on XGBoost and BERT. We train and evaluate the models on a labeled dataset of political social media posts using standard classification metrics. The experimental results show that the XGBoost model reaches an F1-score of 0.2835 and the BERT- based model reaches an F1-score of 0.2806 on the test set. These results demonstrate the challenge of classifying complex and contextualized political discourse sentiment and provide a baseline for future research in multiclass political sentiment analysis.

Related papers

• Large Language Models Unpack Complex Political Opinions through Target-Stance Extraction [1.3822821449151652]
  Political polarization emerges from a complex interplay of beliefs about policies, figures, and issues.<n>Large Language Models (LLMs) can extract complex political opinions with minimal supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-07T23:01:09Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• Operational Validation of Large-Language-Model Agent Social Simulation: Evidence from Voat v/technology [59.63189507373199]
  We build a technology community simulation modeled on Voat, a Reddit-like alt-right news aggregator and discussion platform active from 2014 to 2020.<n>Using the YSocial framework, we seed the simulation with a fixed catalog of technology links sampled from Voat's shared URLs.<n>Agents generate posts, replies, and reactions under platform rules for link and text submissions, threaded replies and daily activity cycles.<n>Results indicate familiar online regularities: similar activity rhythms, heavy-tailed participation, sparse low-clustering interaction networks, core-periphery structure, topical alignment with Voat, and elevated toxicity
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T16:06:27Z)
• "Whose Side Are You On?" Estimating Ideology of Political and News Content Using Large Language Models and Few-shot Demonstration Selection [5.277598111323805]
  Existing approaches to classifying ideology are limited in that they require extensive human effort, the labeling of large datasets, and are not able to adapt to evolving ideological contexts.<n>This paper explores the potential of Large Language Models for classifying the political ideology of online content in the context of the two-party US political spectrum through in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T02:32:25Z)
• The Impact of Persona-based Political Perspectives on Hateful Content Detection [4.04666623219944]
  Politically diverse language models require computational resources often inaccessible to many researchers and organizations.<n>Recent work has established that persona-based prompting can introduce political diversity in model outputs without additional training.<n>We investigate whether such prompting strategies can achieve results comparable to political pretraining for downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T09:53:17Z)
• AgoraSpeech: A multi-annotated comprehensive dataset of political discourse through the lens of humans and AI [1.3060410279656598]
  AgoraSpeech is a meticulously curated, high-quality dataset of 171 political speeches from six parties during the Greek national elections in 2023.<n>The dataset includes annotations (per paragraph) for six natural language processing (NLP) tasks: text classification, topic identification, sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, polarization and populism detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T18:17:59Z)
• Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science [159.95299889946637]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in political science tasks.<n>Political-LLM aims to advance the comprehensive understanding of integrating LLMs into computational political science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T08:47:50Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.<n>We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Fairness meets Cross-Domain Learning: a new perspective on Models and Metrics [80.07271410743806]
  We study the relationship between cross-domain learning (CD) and model fairness. We introduce a benchmark on face and medical images spanning several demographic groups as well as classification and localization tasks. Our study covers 14 CD approaches alongside three state-of-the-art fairness algorithms and shows how the former can outperform the latter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T09:34:05Z)
• PAR: Political Actor Representation Learning with Social Context and Expert Knowledge [45.215862050840116]
  We propose textbfPAR, a textbfPolitical textbfActor textbfRepresentation learning framework. We retrieve and extract factual statements about legislators to leverage social context information. We then construct a heterogeneous information network to incorporate social context and use relational graph neural networks to learn legislator representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T19:28:06Z)
• Sentiment Analysis Based on Deep Learning: A Comparative Study [69.09570726777817]
  The study of public opinion can provide us with valuable information. The efficiency and accuracy of sentiment analysis is being hindered by the challenges encountered in natural language processing. This paper reviews the latest studies that have employed deep learning to solve sentiment analysis problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T16:28:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.