Query Translation vs. Cross-Lingual Embeddings for Sinhala-Tamil E-Government Information Retrieval
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12820v1
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 04:49:39 GMT
- Title: Query Translation vs. Cross-Lingual Embeddings for Sinhala-Tamil E-Government Information Retrieval
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a comparative evaluation of cross-lingual information retrieval methods.<n>Two CLIR paradigms are investigated: Query Translation (QT), employing Google Translate, NLLB, and mBART50, and Cross-Lingual Embeddings (CLE)<n>BGE-M3 achieves the highest Recall@15, reaching 96.2% for Sinhala-English and 95.6% for Tamil-English.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a comparative evaluation of cross-lingual information retrieval (CLIR) methods for retrieving English government information using Sinhala and Tamil queries. Two CLIR paradigms are investigated: Query Translation (QT), employing Google Translate, NLLB, and mBART50, and Cross-Lingual Embeddings (CLE), using LaBSE, multilingual E5, and BGE-M3, with monolingual English retrieval as the baseline. Experiments are conducted on a human-verified benchmark comprising 500 Sinhala, Tamil, and English question-answer pairs derived from 1,699 segmented contexts from Sri Lanka's Government Information Center (GIC). Retrieval performance is evaluated using Recall@k (k = 1, 3, 5, 10, 15). Monolingual retrieval performs poorly (Recall@15 <10%), whereas all CLIR approaches substantially improve retrieval accuracy. Among them, BGE-M3 achieves the highest Recall@15, reaching 96.2% for Sinhala-English and 95.6% for Tamil-English, outperforming the best QT approach (Google Translate: 92.4% and 93.0%) while avoiding translation overhead. These results demonstrate that multilingual embedding models provide a more effective and scalable solution for cross-lingual retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in low-resource government domains.
Related papers
- Multilingual Semantic Retrieval for Apple Music Search [0.0]
Apple Music serves listeners across 150+ storefronts in dozens of languages, with a catalog that grows by hundreds of thousands of new tracks daily.<n>At this scale, search recall on misspelled, transliterated, and cross-lingual queries becomes a dominant driver of session quality.<n>We present a multilingual semantic retrieval system built on a 305M- parameter Siamese bi-encoder fine-tuned from GTE-multilingual-base.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-11T10:00:48Z) - Cross-lingual Relation Extraction with Large Language Models: Zero-Shot, Few-Shot, and Fine-Tuned Evaluation on Romanian [2.929334248463484]
We translate the SemEval-2010 Task 8 benchmark from English to Romanian using an LLM-based translation pipeline.<n>We evaluate Gemma 4 31B under zero-shot, few-shot, and QLoRA fine-tuned configurations.<n>Our results show that Romanian incurs a 3 to 5 percentage point (pp) drop relative to English in prompt-only settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-30T14:22:46Z) - The Multilingual Curse at the Retrieval Layer: Evidence from Amharic [49.25758237235551]
Strong zero-shot scores on multilingual benchmarks are often taken as evidence that current encoders transfer reliably across many languages.<n>We argue that this assumption breaks down for underrepresented, morphologically rich languages.<n>We compare zero-shot multilingual retrievers, Amharic-fine-tuned multilingual retrievers, and monolingual Amharic retrievers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-23T12:44:30Z) - One Instruction Does Not Fit All: How Well Do Embeddings Align Personas and Instructions in Low-Resource Indian Languages? [1.071318785217926]
We present a benchmark spanning 12 Indian languages and four evaluation tasks.<n>E5-Large-Instruct achieves the highest Recall@1 of 27.4% on monolingual retrieval and 20.7% on cross-lingual transfer.<n>For classification, LaBSE attains 75.3% AUROC with strong calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T09:10:14Z) - Optimized Text Embedding Models and Benchmarks for Amharic Passage Retrieval [49.1574468325115]
We introduce Amharic-specific dense retrieval models based on pre-trained Amharic BERT and RoBERTa backbones.<n>Our proposed RoBERTa-Base-Amharic-Embed model (110M parameters) achieves a 17.6% relative improvement in MRR@10.<n>More compact variants, such as RoBERTa-Medium-Amharic-Embed (42M) remain competitive while being over 13x smaller.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-25T23:06:20Z) - Bridging the Gap: Enhancing LLM Performance for Low-Resource African Languages with New Benchmarks, Fine-Tuning, and Cultural Adjustments [0.9214083577876088]
This paper creates approximately 1 million human-translated words of new benchmark data in 8 low-resource African languages.<n>Our benchmarks are translations of Winogrande and three sections of MMLU: college medicine, clinical knowledge, and virology.<n>Using the benchmarks translated, we report previously unknown performance gaps between state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs in English and African languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T23:50:21Z) - Cross-lingual Contextualized Phrase Retrieval [63.80154430930898]
We propose a new task formulation of dense retrieval, cross-lingual contextualized phrase retrieval.
We train our Cross-lingual Contextualized Phrase Retriever (CCPR) using contrastive learning.
On the phrase retrieval task, CCPR surpasses baselines by a significant margin, achieving a top-1 accuracy that is at least 13 points higher.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-25T14:46:51Z) - Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for
Low-Resource Languages [51.301942056881146]
We investigate how large language models (LLMs) function as rerankers in cross-lingual information retrieval systems for African languages.
Our implementation covers English and four African languages (Hausa, Somali, Swahili, and Yoruba)
We examine cross-lingual reranking with queries in English and passages in the African languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T18:38:54Z) - "Knowing When You Don't Know": A Multilingual Relevance Assessment Dataset for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation [90.09260023184932]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds Large Language Model (LLM) output by leveraging external knowledge sources to reduce factual hallucinations.
NoMIRACL is a human-annotated dataset for evaluating LLM robustness in RAG across 18 typologically diverse languages.
We measure relevance assessment using: (i) hallucination rate, measuring model tendency to hallucinate, when the answer is not present in passages in the non-relevant subset, and (ii) error rate, measuring model inaccuracy to recognize relevant passages in the relevant subset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T17:18:04Z) - Massively Multilingual Shallow Fusion with Large Language Models [62.76735265311028]
We train a single multilingual language model (LM) for shallow fusion in multiple languages.
Compared to a dense LM of similar computation during inference, GLaM reduces the WER of an English long-tail test set by 4.4% relative.
In a multilingual shallow fusion task, GLaM improves 41 out of 50 languages with an average relative WER reduction of 3.85%, and a maximum reduction of 10%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-17T14:46:38Z) - AmericasNLI: Evaluating Zero-shot Natural Language Understanding of
Pretrained Multilingual Models in Truly Low-resource Languages [75.08199398141744]
We present AmericasNLI, an extension of XNLI (Conneau et al.), to 10 indigenous languages of the Americas.
We conduct experiments with XLM-R, testing multiple zero-shot and translation-based approaches.
We find that XLM-R's zero-shot performance is poor for all 10 languages, with an average performance of 38.62%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-18T05:32:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.