How retriever redundancy and diversity impact RAG effectiveness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13956v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 04:55:31 GMT
• Title: How retriever redundancy and diversity impact RAG effectiveness
• Abstract summary: In RAG, while the retriever typically ranks documents by their individual relevance to the query, the generator instead produces an answer based on the retrieved documents as a whole.<n>This paper investigates how redundancy and diversity from the retrieved document set impact the generator in terms of answer correctness.
• Score: 33.306933250440174
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In RAG, while the retriever typically ranks documents by their individual relevance to the query, the generator instead produces an answer based on the retrieved documents as a whole. This paper investigates how redundancy and diversity from the retrieved document set impact the generator in terms of answer correctness. Previous work has provided a mix of findings: some showing that redundancy improves generation by reinforcing relevant information, others that LLM-based paraphrasing of the same content may be beneficial. Many of these studies did not control for confounding factors like whether the documents contained the exact answer or not, and if parametric knowledge plays a role. We conduct a carefully controlled experiment investigating three key scenarios of retrieved document sets: 1) Duplicate (exact copies of the same document), 2) Paraphrased (LLM rephrased versions of one document) and 3) Diverse (documents from different genres each containing relevant information in different forms). We control for which documents contain the answer in exact match or rephrased form. Evaluation is done with FictionalQA, a synthetic, fictional question-answer dataset that ensures the LLM generator prior knowledge cannot answer the question; the answer must come from retrieved documents. We show that duplicate redundancy and LLM paraphrasing does not significantly improve answer correctness. However, providing diverse documents is highly beneficial, improving answer correctness by 17%-47%. We further show this improvement is driven by diverse forms of document genre (news, blogs, etc.) alone and not a consequence of more relevant answer being available to generator. Our findings help to direct more attention to how new retrieval methods might improve RAG by catering to the generator preference for diversity in retrieval results.

Related papers

• Structures Facilitate Retrieve, Rerank, and Generate [11.039868951381164]
  Document-grounded dialogue systems (DGDS) utilize knowledge from external documents to answer domain-specific user questions.<n>This paper proposes SF-Re2G to address such issues systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T07:09:41Z)
• R$^3$AG: Retriever Routing for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [59.47703698994575]
  R$3$AG decomposes retriever capability into two learnable dimensions: retrieval quality and generation utility.<n>R$3$AG consistently outperforms both the best individual retrievers and state-of-the-art static routing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T06:51:20Z)
• Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitation [83.79639293409802]
  RAG systems address complex user requests by decomposing them into subqueries, retrieving potentially relevant documents for each, and then aggregating them to generate an answer.<n>We formulate query decomposition and document retrieval in an exploitation-exploration setting, where retrieving one document at a time builds a belief about the utility of a given sub-queries.<n>Our main finding is that estimating document relevance using rank information and human judgments yields a 35% gain in document-level precision, 15% increase in alpha-nDCG, and better performance on the downstream task of long-form generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T13:37:11Z)
• Collapse of Dense Retrievers: Short, Early, and Literal Biases Outranking Factual Evidence [56.09494651178128]
  Retrieval models are commonly used in Information Retrieval (IR) applications, such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)<n>We quantify the impact of biases, such as a preference for shorter documents, on retrievers like Dragon+ and Contriever.<n>We uncover major vulnerabilities, showing retrievers favor shorter documents, early positions, repeated entities, and literal matches, all while ignoring the answer's presence!
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T23:23:13Z)
• Evidence Contextualization and Counterfactual Attribution for Conversational QA over Heterogeneous Data with RAG Systems [4.143039012104666]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) works as a backbone for interacting with an enterprise's own data via Conversational Question Answering (ConvQA)<n>In this work, we demonstrate RAGONITE, a RAG system that remedies the above concerns by: (i) contextualizing evidence with source metadata and surrounding text; and (ii) computing counterfactual attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T21:28:17Z)
• RichRAG: Crafting Rich Responses for Multi-faceted Queries in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [35.981443744108255]
  We propose a novel RAG framework, namely RichRAG. It includes a sub-aspect explorer to identify potential sub-aspects of input questions, a retriever to build a candidate pool of diverse external documents related to these sub-aspects, and a generative list-wise ranker. Experimental results on two publicly available datasets prove that our framework effectively and efficiently provides comprehensive and satisfying responses to users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T12:52:51Z)
• DR-RAG: Applying Dynamic Document Relevance to Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question-Answering [4.364937306005719]
  RAG has recently demonstrated the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the knowledge-intensive tasks such as Question-Answering (QA) We have found that even though there is low relevance between some critical documents and query, it is possible to retrieve the remaining documents by combining parts of the documents with the query. A two-stage retrieval framework called Dynamic-Relevant Retrieval-Augmented Generation (DR-RAG) is proposed to improve document retrieval recall and the accuracy of answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T15:15:33Z)
• Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generators [74.87021992611672]
  We present a novel perspective for solving knowledge-intensive tasks by replacing document retrievers with large language model generators. We call our method generate-then-read (GenRead), which first prompts a large language model to generate contextutal documents based on a given question, and then reads the generated documents to produce the final answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T01:30:59Z)
• GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification [57.78768817972026]
  We propose GERE, the first system that retrieves evidences in a generative fashion. The experimental results on the FEVER dataset show that GERE achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T03:49:35Z)
• Knowledge-Aided Open-Domain Question Answering [58.712857964048446]
  We propose a knowledge-aided open-domain QA (KAQA) method which targets at improving relevant document retrieval and answer reranking. During document retrieval, a candidate document is scored by considering its relationship to the question and other documents. During answer reranking, a candidate answer is reranked using not only its own context but also the clues from other documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T13:28:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.