Batch-wise Adaptive Pruning: Periodic Neuron Activation-Aware Weight Pruning for Language Reasoning Model
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14003v1
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 06:46:02 GMT
- Title: Batch-wise Adaptive Pruning: Periodic Neuron Activation-Aware Weight Pruning for Language Reasoning Model
- Abstract summary: We propose a training-free adaptive pruning method for batched inference in LRMs.<n>We replace threshold-based selection with periodic top-k selection over the aggregated importance scores.<n>Our method outperforms the previous state-of-the-art adaptive pruning method by 39.7 percentage points in average accuracy at batch size 4.
- Score: 41.842373153015586
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex tasks through extended chain-of-thought generation, but incur substantial computational costs during inference. In production settings, batched inference is essential for high throughput, yet the existing training-free adaptive pruning methods we evaluate severely degrade in this regime. Because a batch must share a single pruning mask, these methods aggregate activations across samples and then apply threshold-based selection; the threshold, calibrated offline on unaggregated activations, no longer matches the aggregated distribution, so the realized sparsity ratio drifts and accuracy on reasoning tasks collapses under batched inference. In this work, we propose a training-free adaptive pruning method designed specifically for batched inference in LRMs, built on two components. First, we replace threshold-based selection with periodic top-k selection over the aggregated importance scores, which is unaffected by the shift that aggregation induces in the activation distribution, and which runs selection once per update period rather than at every token, preserving the speedup. Second, based on the observation that important neurons re-fire periodically during long reasoning generation, we introduce an activation memory that accumulates importance across update phases so that recurring neurons are retained. Experiments on diverse reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method outperforms the previous state-of-the-art adaptive pruning method by 39.7 percentage points in average accuracy at batch size 4 with 50% target sparsity on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B, and reaches 1.40x speedup over dense inference at 50% actual sparsity.
Related papers
- Residual-Guided Randomized Neural Networks [7.698602367824994]
Randomized neural networks enable fast and analytically tractable training by fixing the input to hidden layer parameters at random and learning the output weights in closed form.<n>We propose a simple and broadly applicable residual guided procedure that greedily constructs the hidden layer using a closed form residual decrease criterion.<n>We show that the proposed residual-guided models consistently outperform their baseline counterparts in terms of accuracy, stability, and overall ranking performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-28T12:30:08Z) - Stop When Further Reasoning Won't Help: Attention-State Adaptive Generation in Reasoning Models [11.158010513386666]
Large reasoning models (LRMs) can solve complex problems through explicit chain-of-thought reasoning processes.<n>LRMs often suffer from overthinking, resulting in redundant token outputs and degraded accuracy.<n>We propose ASAG, which infers the model's reasoning state and adaptively adjusts the generation strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-13T02:58:29Z) - When Learning Rates Go Wrong: Early Structural Signals in PPO Actor-Critic [1.0518862318418603]
Overfitting-Underfitting Indicator (OUI) is a metric that quantifies the balance of binary activation patterns over a fixed probe batch.<n>We show that OUI measured at only 10% of training already discriminates between LR regimes.<n>We then compare OUI-based screening rules against early return, clip-based, divergence-based, and flip-based criteria under matched recall over successful runs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T17:46:31Z) - Stepwise Penalization for Length-Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [66.22060690012512]
Large reasoning models improve with more test-time computation, but often overthink, producing unnecessarily long chains-of-thought that raise cost without improving accuracy.<n>We propose Step-wise Adaptive Penalization (SWAP), a fine-grained framework that allocates length reduction across steps based on intrinsic contribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T20:23:59Z) - ODAR: Principled Adaptive Routing for LLM Reasoning via Active Inference [60.958331943869126]
ODAR-Expert is an adaptive routing framework that optimize the accuracy-efficiency trade-off via principled resource allocation.<n>We show strong and consistent gains, including 98.2% accuracy on MATH and 54.8% on Humanity's Last Exam.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T05:22:01Z) - Activation-Space Uncertainty Quantification for Pretrained Networks [2.001149416674759]
We introduce Gaussian Process Activations (GAPA), a post-hoc method that shifts Bayesian modeling from weights to activations.<n>GAPA replaces standard nonlinearities with activations whose posterior mean exactly matches the original activation, preserving the backbone's point predictions by construction.<n>To scale to modern architectures, we use a sparse variational inducing-point approximation over cached training activations, combined with local k-nearest-neighbor conditioning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-16T17:17:08Z) - What If We Allocate Test-Time Compute Adaptively? [2.1713977971908944]
Test-time scaling allocates inference computation uniformly, uses fixed sampling strategies, and applies verification only for reranking.<n>We propose a verifier-guided adaptive framework treating reasoning as iterative trajectory generation and selection.<n>Across datasets, our dynamic, PRM-guided approach consistently outperforms direct test-time scaling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T07:30:22Z) - Correct, Concise and Complete: Multi-stage Training For Adaptive Reasoning [11.179446105672461]
We propose a multi-stage efficient reasoning method that combines supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.<n>Our approach reduces response length by an average of 28% for 8B models and 40% for 32B models.<n>It achieves a superior trade-off compared to more complex state-of-the-art efficient reasoning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T12:31:51Z) - Efficient Thought Space Exploration through Strategic Intervention [54.35208611253168]
We propose a novel Hint-Practice Reasoning (HPR) framework that operationalizes this insight through two synergistic components.<n>The framework's core innovation lies in Distributional Inconsistency Reduction (DIR), which dynamically identifies intervention points.<n> Experiments across arithmetic and commonsense reasoning benchmarks demonstrate HPR's state-of-the-art efficiency-accuracy tradeoffs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T07:26:01Z) - Relaxed Quantile Regression: Prediction Intervals for Asymmetric Noise [51.87307904567702]
Quantile regression is a leading approach for obtaining such intervals via the empirical estimation of quantiles in the distribution of outputs.<n>We propose Relaxed Quantile Regression (RQR), a direct alternative to quantile regression based interval construction that removes this arbitrary constraint.<n>We demonstrate that this added flexibility results in intervals with an improvement in desirable qualities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T13:36:38Z) - The Lipschitz-Variance-Margin Tradeoff for Enhanced Randomized Smoothing [85.85160896547698]
Real-life applications of deep neural networks are hindered by their unsteady predictions when faced with noisy inputs and adversarial attacks.
We show how to design an efficient classifier with a certified radius by relying on noise injection into the inputs.
Our novel certification procedure allows us to use pre-trained models with randomized smoothing, effectively improving the current certification radius in a zero-shot manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-28T22:41:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.