The Authority Resolution Framework: A Five-Domain Ontology for Governing Who and What Decides, at Scale

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15832v1
• Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:05:50 GMT
• Title: The Authority Resolution Framework: A Five-Domain Ontology for Governing Who and What Decides, at Scale
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Authority Resolution Framework (ARF), a five-domain ontology for representing and resolving authority.<n>ARF defines the Authority Relation (AR) as a cross-domain primitive binding an actor, action, object, bounded context, justification chain, and a calibration measure.<n>ARF is designed to support AI agents in determining the provenance, scope and contextual validity of authority before executing consequential actions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As AI systems become increasingly capable of autonomous action, determining whether an agent is technically capable of performing an action is insufficient: the system must also determine whether the action is authorised in its context. This paper introduces the Authority Resolution Framework (ARF), a five-domain ontology for representing and resolving authority across organisational roles and informal influence, business concepts, codified processes, machine-readable permissions and executable systems, and external real-world context. ARF defines the Authority Relation (AR) as a cross-domain primitive binding an actor, action, object, bounded context, justification chain, and a calibration measure termed the DNA-Coefficient, which captures divergence between documented authority structures and authority as practiced. The framework provides a machine-interpretable representation of authority provenance and scope, with JSON-LD representations and knowledge-graph query patterns for authority resolution. ARF is designed to support AI agents in determining the provenance, scope and contextual validity of authority before executing consequential actions. The framework positions authority resolution as a knowledge-representation and reasoning problem at the intersection of ontology engineering, semantic AI, agentic AI and AI governance.

Related papers

• Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework [2.4469484645516832]
  We present AgentBound, a runtime governance framework that provides verifiable behavioral oversight for autonomous AI agents.<n>AgentBound evaluates each proposed action using three independent authorities: delegated authorization, owner-signed behavioral constitutions, and site action contracts.<n>AgentBound generates cryptographically verifiable governance receipts that bind every action to the exact delegation, policy, and semantic artifacts governing the decision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T23:12:06Z)
• Artificial Intelligence as Monism: Ontological, Organisational, and Methodological Implications [31.495834538807525]
  The paper contends that AI is not merely a collection of components but a single, indivisible essence reflecting the singularity it replicates.<n>Epistemologically, it positions AI as the central interpretive force across technological, organisational, and societal domains.<n>Ultimately, this paper calls for a paradigm shift in how AI is conceptualised, governed, and integrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T16:43:23Z)
• Overlaying Governance: A Compositional Authorization Framework for Delegation and Scope in Agentic AI [5.459755757192724]
  This paper proposes a compositional governance framework for agentic AI systems.<n>We define types of delegation and their permissions and accountability implications.<n>It provides a formal yet practical foundation for accountable authorization in agentic AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T11:39:39Z)
• Digital Identity for Agentic Systems: Toward a Portable Authorization Standard for Autonomous Agents [0.0]
  This paper analyzes representative enterprise use cases in insurance claims processing and supply chain integrity.<n>It proposes a portable authorization model for autonomous agents based on issuer-authored authorization payloads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T04:04:34Z)
• Chain-of-Authorization: Internalizing Authorization into Large Language Models via Reasoning Trajectories [21.063230721511726]
  Chain-of-Authorization (CoA) framework internalizes authorization logic into Large Language Models' core capabilities.<n>CoA integrates policy execution with task responses, making authorization a causal prerequisite for substantive responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T07:13:01Z)
• Operational Agency: A Permeable Legal Fiction for Tracing Culpability in AI Systems [0.31061678033205636]
  This Article introduces Operational Agency (OA)-a permeable legal fiction structured as an ex post evidentiary framework-and Operational Agency Graph (OAG)<n>OA evaluates an AI's observable operational characteristics.<n>OAG operationalizes that analysis by embedding these characteristics in a causal graph to trace and apportion culpability among developers, fine-tuners, deployers, and users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T01:49:03Z)
• Assured Autonomy: How Operations Research Powers and Orchestrates Generative AI Systems [18.881800772626427]
  We argue generative models can be fragile in operational domains unless paired with mechanisms that provide feasibility, robustness to distribution shift, and stress testing.<n>We develop a conceptual framework for assured autonomy grounded in operations research.<n>These elements define a research agenda for assured autonomy in safety-critical, reliability-sensitive operational domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T04:24:06Z)
• Towards Responsible and Explainable AI Agents with Consensus-Driven Reasoning [4.226647687395254]
  This paper presents a Responsible(RAI) and Explainable(XAI) AI Agent Architecture for production-grade agentic based on multi-model consensus and reasoning-layer governance.<n>In the proposed design, a consortium of heterogeneous LLM and VLM agents independently generates candidate outputs from a shared input context.<n>A dedicated reasoning agent then performs structured consolidation across these outputs, enforcing safety and policy constraints, mitigating hallucinations and bias, and producing auditable, evidence-backed decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-25T14:49:25Z)
• A Vision for Access Control in LLM-based Agent Systems [23.59407514665941]
  This paper argues for a paradigm shift from binary access control to a more sophisticated model of information governance.<n>We introduce Agent Access Control (AAC), a novel framework that reframes AC as a dynamic, context-aware process of information flow governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T07:57:09Z)
• Statutory Construction and Interpretation for Artificial Intelligence [19.65776192762091]
  We show how different interpretations of the same rule can lead to inconsistent or unstable model behavior.<n>We propose a computational framework that mirrors two legal mechanisms.<n>Our approach offers a first step toward systematically managing interpretive ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T07:10:22Z)
• Resolving Ethics Trade-offs in Implementing Responsible AI [18.894725256708128]
  We cover five approaches for addressing the tensions via trade-offs, ranging from rudimentary to complex.<n>None of the approaches is likely to be appropriate for all organisations, systems, or applications.<n>We propose a framework which consists of: (i) proactive identification of tensions, (ii) prioritisation and weighting of ethics aspects, (iii) justification and documentation of trade-off decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T04:14:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.