Related papers: The New Mathematics of Democracy

The New Mathematics of Democracy

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16869v1
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:51:16 GMT
Title: The New Mathematics of Democracy
Abstract summary: It uses three case studies to highlight how contemporary challenges motivate rigorous mathematical research.<n>Within each case, we highlight active and promising research frontiers, evidence of real-world impact, practical applications, and opportunities for getting involved.
Score: 3.1225375941154017
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: This article surveys emerging directions in the mathematics of democracy. It uses three case studies --- voting theory, participatory budgeting, and deliberative democracy --- to highlight how contemporary challenges motivate rigorous mathematical research that incorporates real-world data, institutional constraints, and implementation feasibility. Within each case, we highlight active and promising research frontiers, evidence of real-world impact, practical applications, and opportunities for getting involved.

Related papers

Computational Challenges in Scaling Democratic Deliberation [3.225584113430749]
The paper provides an overview of core functionalities that digital democracy software needs to provide in order to support democratic deliberative processes at scale.<n>The aim of the paper is to break the first ground towards a structured inventory of such problems, and to position possible approaches to them within current academic research in computer science and artificial intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-02T16:38:17Z)
A Replica for our Democracies? On Using Digital Twins to Enhance Deliberative Democracy [0.41942958779358663]
This paper explores Digital Twin (DT) technology as a computational testing ground for deliberative systems.<n>By constructing dynamic models that simulate real-world deliberation, DTs allow researchers and policymakers to rigorously test "what-if" scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T23:14:41Z)
Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z)
Digital Homunculi: Reimagining Democracy Research with Generative Agents [0.0]
I examine the potential of GenAI-assisted research to mitigate current limitations in democratic experimentation. I argue that the benefits of synthetic data are likely to outweigh their drawbacks if implemented with proper caution. The paper concludes with a call for interdisciplinary collaboration in the development and implementation of GenAI-assisted methods in democracy research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-01T19:57:32Z)
Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models [54.48283690603358]
This study seeks to identify and quantify biases in simulating political samples with Large Language Models. Using the GPT-3.5-Turbo model, we leverage data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, Zuobiao dataset, and China Family Panel Studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T05:52:26Z)
Enabling the Digital Democratic Revival: A Research Program for Digital Democracy [68.02254954746476]
This white paper outlines a long-term scientific vision for the development of digital-democracy technology. It arose from the Lorentz Center Workshop on Algorithmic Technology for Democracy'' (Leiden, October 2022)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T10:12:49Z)
Academic competitions [61.592427413342975]
This chapter provides a survey of academic challenges in the context of machine learning and related fields. We review the most influential competitions in the last few years and analyze challenges per area of knowledge. The aims of scientific challenges, their goals, major achievements and expectations for the next few years are reviewed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-01T01:01:04Z)
Getting aligned on representational alignment [93.08284685325674]
We study the study of representational alignment in cognitive science, neuroscience, and machine learning. Despite their overlapping interests, there is limited knowledge transfer between these fields. We propose a unifying framework that can serve as a common language for research on representational alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-18T17:47:58Z)
Causal Reasoning Meets Visual Representation Learning: A Prospective Study [117.08431221482638]
Lack of interpretability, robustness, and out-of-distribution generalization are becoming the challenges of the existing visual models. Inspired by the strong inference ability of human-level agents, recent years have witnessed great effort in developing causal reasoning paradigms. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of this emerging field, attract attention, encourage discussions, bring to the forefront the urgency of developing novel causal reasoning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-26T02:22:28Z)
Individual Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Survey for Practitioners [69.02688684221265]
The use of sophisticated statistical models that influence decisions in domains of high societal relevance is on the rise. Many governments, institutions, and companies are reluctant to their adoption as their output is often difficult to explain in human-interpretable ways. Recently, the academic literature has proposed a substantial amount of methods for providing interpretable explanations to machine learning models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-09T01:46:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.