CoAL-RAG: A Complexity-Aware Legal Retrieval-Augmented Generation Method
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17536v2
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 11:27:28 GMT
- Title: CoAL-RAG: A Complexity-Aware Legal Retrieval-Augmented Generation Method
- Abstract summary: CoAL-RAG is a complexity-aware legal retrieval-augmented generation method.<n>It constructs a multi-dimensional evaluation mechanism based on question essence'' and retrieval consistency''<n>On Chinese datasets, the BLEU score improves by 42.5% and ROUGE-L reaches 3.6 times that of knowledge graph-based methods.
- Score: 6.751636537163415
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Legal consultation questions exhibit multi-level complexity. A single retrieval strategy often leads to over-reasoning for simple questions and poor interpretability for complex ones, making it difficult to meet the requirements for both answer quality and efficiency in high-risk scenarios. To address this issue, this paper proposes CoAL-RAG, a complexity-aware legal retrieval-augmented generation method, which constructs a multi-dimensional evaluation mechanism based on ``question essence'' and ``retrieval consistency'' to enable adaptive routing of retrieval strategies. First, the reasoning demand is quantified according to the logical structure of the question. Then, the discrepancy between semantic retrieval and keyword retrieval is utilized to indirectly reflect problem complexity, thereby selecting the most appropriate retrieval strategy and dynamically filtering contextual information. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms baseline models not only on Chinese legal benchmarks (SocialLawQA, LawBench) but also demonstrates strong cross-jurisdictional generalization on English datasets (LexGLUE, CaseHold). Specifically, on Chinese datasets, the BLEU score improves by 42.5\% and ROUGE-L reaches 3.6 times that of knowledge graph-based methods. On English benchmarks, CoAL-RAG maintains highly competitive accuracy, achieving an optimal balance between generation quality, deep logical reasoning, and system efficiency across different legal systems.
Related papers
- Transforming External Knowledge into Triplets for Enhanced Retrieval in RAG of LLMs [55.78708003681562]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates hallucination in large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge during generation.<n>Existing RAG approaches typically retrieve and unstructured text fragments as context.<n>We propose Tri-RAG, a structured triplet-based retrieval framework that improves retrieval efficiency through reasoning-aligned context construction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T11:36:29Z) - When should I search more: Adaptive Complex Query Optimization with Reinforcement Learning [26.489185170468062]
We propose a novel RL framework called Adaptive Complex Query Optimization (ACQO)<n>Our framework is designed to adaptively determine when and how to expand the search process.<n>ACQO achieves state-of-the-art performance on three complex query benchmarks, significantly outperforming established baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T03:16:53Z) - LegalMALR:Multi-Agent Query Understanding and LLM-Based Reranking for Chinese Statute Retrieval [10.997604609194033]
Statute retrieval is essential for legal assistance and judicial decision support.<n>Real-world legal queries are often implicit, multi-issue, and expressed in colloquial or underspecified forms.<n>We present LegalMALR, a retrieval framework that integrates a Multi-Agent Query Understanding System with a zero-shot large-language-generated reranking module.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-25T04:44:56Z) - Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z) - Towards Context-aware Reasoning-enhanced Generative Searching in E-commerce [61.03081096959132]
We propose a context-aware reasoning-enhanced generative search framework for better textbfunderstanding the complicated context.<n>Our approach achieves superior performance compared with strong baselines, validating its effectiveness for search-based recommendation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-19T16:46:11Z) - Learning to Route: A Rule-Driven Agent Framework for Hybrid-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation [55.47971671635531]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance on general Question Answering (QA)<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this limitation by enriching LLMs with external knowledge.<n>Existing systems primarily rely on unstructured documents, while largely overlooking relational databases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T22:19:44Z) - Augmented Question-guided Retrieval (AQgR) of Indian Case Law with LLM, RAG, and Structured Summaries [0.0]
This paper proposes the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to facilitate the retrieval of relevant cases.<n>Our approach combines Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) with structured summaries optimized for Indian case law.<n>The system generates targeted legal questions based on factual scenarios to identify relevant case law more effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-23T05:24:44Z) - Tree-Based Text Retrieval via Hierarchical Clustering in RAGFrameworks: Application on Taiwanese Regulations [0.0]
We propose a hierarchical clustering-based retrieval method that eliminates the need to predefine k.<n>Our approach maintains the accuracy and relevance of system responses while adaptively selecting semantically relevant content.<n>Our framework is simple to implement and easily integrates with existing RAG pipelines, making it a practical solution for real-world applications under limited resources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T15:34:29Z) - Elevating Legal LLM Responses: Harnessing Trainable Logical Structures and Semantic Knowledge with Legal Reasoning [19.477062052536887]
We propose the Logical-Semantic Integration Model (LSIM), a supervised framework that bridges semantic and logical coherence.<n>LSIM comprises three components: reinforcement learning predicts a structured fact-rule chain for each question, a trainable Deep Structured Semantic Model (DSSM) retrieves the most relevant candidate questions and in-answer learning generates the final answer.<n>Our experiments on a real-world legal dataset QA-validated through both automated metrics and human evaluation-demonstrate that LSIM significantly enhances accuracy and reliability compared to existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-11T19:33:07Z) - JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Reranking [81.88787401178378]
We introduce JudgeRank, a novel agentic reranker that emulates human cognitive processes when assessing document relevance.
We evaluate JudgeRank on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark, demonstrating substantial performance improvements over first-stage retrieval methods.
In addition, JudgeRank performs on par with fine-tuned state-of-the-art rerankers on the popular BEIR benchmark, validating its zero-shot generalization capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T18:43:12Z) - Adaptive-RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexity [59.57065228857247]
Retrieval-augmented Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising approach to enhancing response accuracy in several tasks, such as Question-Answering (QA)
We propose a novel adaptive QA framework, that can dynamically select the most suitable strategy for (retrieval-augmented) LLMs based on the query complexity.
We validate our model on a set of open-domain QA datasets, covering multiple query complexities, and show that ours enhances the overall efficiency and accuracy of QA systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T13:52:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.