Delegation Asymmetry in Agentic Recommender Systems: Measuring Two-Sided Receptivity in Online Dating

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18058v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 17:51:16 GMT
• Title: Delegation Asymmetry in Agentic Recommender Systems: Measuring Two-Sided Receptivity in Online Dating
• Abstract summary: We study the condition that users accept not only delegating conversation to an agent, but also receiving agent-mediated communication from others.<n>We develop a latent-threshold measurement model of agent receptivity based on graded response models with latent regression.<n>We discuss implications for agentic recommender design, including disclosure, opt-in mechanics, and receptivity-aware matchmaking.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous LLM agents that converse on a user's behalf are an emerging design pattern in matching platforms, yet their viability depends on a condition rarely examined: users must accept not only delegating conversation to an agent, but also receiving agent-mediated communication from others. We study this condition using two large-scale surveys of active users of a major dating platform (N=2,894 on generative profile features; N=2,617 on autonomous conversational agents, fielded in two languages). We develop a latent-variable measurement model of agent receptivity based on graded response models with latent regression, and show via model comparison that willingness to send and willingness to receive agent communication are distinct constructs: highly correlated (rho=0.92) but separable (Delta BIC=52), with partial measurement invariance across languages. The model quantifies a systematic delegation asymmetry: deploying one's own agent requires far lower receptivity (threshold -0.38) than engaging a counterpart's agent (+0.32; full engagement +1.39), and mean deployment propensity exceeds engagement propensity roughly threefold. Under a random-pairing counterfactual derived from stated receptivity, only 4-13% of directed dyads combine agent deployment with receiver engagement, with a pronounced gender-directional imbalance. Design counterfactuals quantify the levers: a reciprocity requirement cuts interaction volume by half or more by excluding nearly two-thirds of would-be deployment, while routing agent contacts on receive receptivity triples per-contact engagement, a lift that survives out-of-sample validation with the target item held out (AUC 0.88, 3.1x quartile lift under respondent-level cross-validation). We discuss implications for agentic recommender design, including disclosure, opt-in mechanics, and receptivity-aware matchmaking.

Related papers

• Agents That Model Agents: Five Principles Toward a Theory of Mind for 6G Networks [24.187937610076265]
  6G networks will rely on Large Language Model (LLM) agents to manage the Radio Access Network (RAN)<n>Current architectures assume inter-agent messages convey objective facts.<n>A message is instead a emphtrace of the sender's reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T18:49:44Z)
• Benchmarking the Personalization Capabilities of Large Language Models [18.115699104947467]
  Personalization is the act of varying a message to induce action from a specific receiver while keeping sender, channel, and time fixed.<n>We adapt the Bayesian Persuasion framework of Kamenica and Gentzkow (2011) to generative agents and instantiate the formulation in sales.<n>We observe a consistent personalization plateau and on a Fortune 100 tech cohort no model statistically separates successful from unsuccessful outreach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T18:16:54Z)
• ProactBench: Beyond What The User Asked For [5.422521416406412]
  ProactBench decomposes it into three phase-tied types: textscEmergent, inference from a single disclosed anchor; textscCritical, synthesis across multiple anchors; and textscRecovery, grounded forward-looking value after task completion.<n>Our information asymmetries defend against style-confounding scoring, leakage, external-context contamination, and information dumps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T23:56:04Z)
• Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
  Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z)
• AgentV-RL: Scaling Reward Modeling with Agentic Verifier [63.55502685076245]
  Verifiers have been demonstrated to enhance LLM reasoning via test-time scaling (TTS)<n>We propose Agentic Verifier, a framework that transforms reward modeling into a multi-turn, tool-augmented deliberative process.<n>We show that Agentic Verifier yields consistent performance gains under both parallel and sequential TTS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T12:27:36Z)
• Breaking User-Centric Agency: A Tri-Party Framework for Agent-Based Recommendation [59.362016745945375]
  We propose the first Tri-party LLM-agent Recommendation framework (TriRec)<n>TriRec explicitly coordinates user utility, item exposure, and platform-level fairness.<n>We show consistent gains in accuracy, fairness, and item-level utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T11:40:13Z)
• Reasoning-Aware Prompt Orchestration: A Foundation Model for Multi-Agent Language Model Coordination [0.0]
  We present a theoretically-grounded framework for dynamic prompt orchestration that enhances reasoning across multiple specialized agents.<n>This framework addresses three core challenges: logical consistency preservation during agent transitions, reasoning-aware prompt adaptation, and scalable coordination of distributed inference.<n> Experimental results on 1,000 synthetic multi-agent conversations demonstrate a 42% reduction in reasoning latency, a 23% improvement in logical consistency measured by ROUGE-L score, and an 89% success rate for task completion without context loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T22:33:01Z)
• STARec: An Efficient Agent Framework for Recommender Systems via Autonomous Deliberate Reasoning [54.28691219536054]
  We introduce STARec, a slow-thinking augmented agent framework that endows recommender systems with autonomous deliberative reasoning capabilities.<n>We develop anchored reinforcement training - a two-stage paradigm combining structured knowledge distillation from advanced reasoning models with preference-aligned reward shaping.<n>Experiments on MovieLens 1M and Amazon CDs benchmarks demonstrate that STARec achieves substantial performance gains compared with state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T08:47:58Z)
• Information Bargaining: Bilateral Commitment in Bayesian Persuasion [60.3761154043329]
  We introduce a unified framework and a well-structured solution concept for long-term persuasion.<n>This perspective makes explicit the common knowledge of the game structure and grants the receiver comparable commitment capabilities.<n>The framework is validated through a two-stage validation-and-inference paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T08:42:34Z)
• Concept Matching with Agent for Out-of-Distribution Detection [19.407364109506904]
  We propose a new method that integrates the agent paradigm into out-of-distribution (OOD) detection task.<n>Our proposed method, Concept Matching with Agent (CMA), employs neutral prompts as agents to augment the CLIP-based OOD detection process.<n>Our extensive experimental results showcase the superior performance of CMA over both zero-shot and training-required methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T02:27:28Z)
• Elastic Weight Removal for Faithful and Abstractive Dialogue Generation [61.40951756070646]
  A dialogue system should generate responses that are faithful to the knowledge contained in relevant documents. Many models generate hallucinated responses instead that contradict it or contain unverifiable information. We show that our method can be extended to simultaneously discourage hallucinations and extractive responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T17:40:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.