On the Fragility of Self-Improving Agents: Variance, Task Order, and Underspecification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18066v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 17:55:07 GMT
• Title: On the Fragility of Self-Improving Agents: Variance, Task Order, and Underspecification
• Abstract summary: Memory-based self-improving agents have shown great promise in recent literature.<n>However, the reliability aspects of these methods have been critically overlooked.<n>In this work, we conduct a comprehensive re-evaluation of two memory-based methods.
• Score: 37.24852847838588
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Memory-based self-improving agents--those that learn from an online stream of tasks and improve over time by maintaining a textual memory bank--have shown great promise in recent literature. However, the reliability aspects of these methods have been critically overlooked. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive re-evaluation of two memory-based methods, broadening the scope of evaluation along two axes: (1) including multiple runs to quantify variance, and (2) randomly shuffling the tasks to investigate the effect of task order. Through these experiments, we make two observations that expose the fragility of current methods: First, agent evaluation is inherently noisy in complex environments and on multi-step tasks, and stacking a self-improving loop on top can further amplify this noise. Second, the agent's improvement is highly dependent on task order. Prior works often adopt default orderings that impose an implicit curriculum, acting as a hidden prerequisite for success. To better understand this fragility, we manually examine the agents' memory and hypothesize that task and environment underspecification contribute to this fragility. We validate this hypothesis by incorporating information that enables better specification, such as detailed rubrics and environment feedback, into the memory construction process. While this added information partially closes the performance degradation in previous experiments, significant gaps still remain, suggesting that other uncharacterized factors contribute to this fragility. Looking ahead, our work advocates for more rigorous evaluation protocols for self-improving agents by reporting results across multiple runs and stress-testing them under challenging conditions. Moreover, our findings on underspecification call for systems and interfaces that enable effective human oversight, preventing agents from failing in unforeseeable ways.

Related papers

• S3Gym: Can LLMs Turn Self-Testing and Self-Judging into Self-Improvement? [66.17176838165994]
  Large language models (LLMs) increasingly interact with external environments and accumulate substantial behavioral experience.<n>It remains unclear whether an agent can actively test its behavior, judge the resulting experience, and use that experience to improve future decisions.<n>We introduce textbfStextsuperscript3Gym, an interactive benchmark for evaluating LLM self-improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T17:05:41Z)
• AgentCL: Toward Rigorous Evaluation of Continual Learning in Language Agents [30.801952443449633]
  Continual learning expects an agent to accumulate reusable experience across a stream of tasks, improve over time, and avoid interference from irrelevant experiences.<n>Most efforts focus on retrieval and reasoning over long-context conversations or documents, while recent lifelong-adaptation benchmarks often rely on naive task streams.<n>This paper presents an evaluation framework AgentCL for continual learning agents, centered on controlled task streams and metrics for transfer gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T16:32:59Z)
• RepoMirage: Probing Repository Context Reasoning in Code Agents with Perturbations [51.43574078961796]
  We introduce RepoMirage, a two-stage evaluation suite built on SWE-Bench Verified.<n>RepoMirage-Perturb applies three types of semantics-preserving repository-level perturbations, revealing a clear performance drop when correct solving requires broader context access.<n>We propose RepoAnchor, a structure-first prototype workflow that separates repository exploration from downstream problem solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T06:26:43Z)
• Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliability [9.570634569436535]
  AI agents are increasingly deployed to execute important tasks.<n>While rising accuracy scores on standard benchmarks suggest rapid progress, many agents still continue to fail in practice.<n>We propose twelve metrics that decompose agent reliability along four key dimensions: consistency, robustness, predictability, and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T18:05:44Z)
• TRACE: Trajectory-Aware Comprehensive Evaluation for Deep Research Agents [51.30998248590416]
  Trajectory-Aware Comprehensive Evaluation (TRACE) is a framework that holistically assesses the entire problem-solving trajectory.<n>Our contributions include the TRACE framework, its novel metrics, and the accompanying DeepResearch-Bench with controllable complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T13:28:57Z)
• TIDE: Trajectory-based Diagnostic Evaluation of Test-Time Improvement in LLM Agents [43.376952807616256]
  Recent advances in autonomous LLM agents demonstrate their ability to improve performance through iterative interaction with the environment.<n>We propose Test-time Improvement Diagnostic Evaluation (TIDE), an agent-agnostic and environment-agnostic framework that decomposes TTI into three comprehensive and interconnected dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T15:00:47Z)
• Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [76.94013626702183]
  We propose a unified Dual-Process Agentic UQ (AUQ) framework that transforms verbalized uncertainty into active, bi-directional control signals.<n>Our architecture comprises two complementary mechanisms: System 1 (Uncertainty-Aware Memory, UAM), which implicitly propagates verbalized confidence and semantic explanations to prevent blind decision-making; and System 2 (Uncertainty-Aware Reflection, UAR), which utilizes these explanations as rational cues to trigger targeted inference-time resolution only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T07:16:26Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• What Do LLM Agents Know About Their World? Task2Quiz: A Paradigm for Studying Environment Understanding [50.35012849818872]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex decision-making and tool-use tasks.<n>We propose Task-to-Quiz (T2Q), a deterministic and automated evaluation paradigm designed to decouple task execution from world-state understanding.<n>Our experiments reveal that task success is often a poor proxy for environment understanding, and that current memory machanism can not effectively help agents acquire a grounded model of the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T14:09:11Z)
• SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
  SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)
• Learning Embeddings for Sequential Tasks Using Population of Agents [27.61165606165948]
  We present an information-theoretic framework to learn fixed-dimensional embeddings for tasks in reinforcement learning. We leverage the idea that two tasks are similar if observing an agent's performance on one task reduces our uncertainty about its performance on the other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T23:38:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.