Quantum Processes under Epistemic Constraints

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18159v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:05:49 GMT
• Title: Quantum Processes under Epistemic Constraints
• Abstract summary: dissertation on the foundations of quantum theory formalizes a physically relevant concept that I have called "Epistemic Constraint"<n>Epistemic constraints are the definite, intersubjectively agreeable, ordinary-language conditions under which experiments are described.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This doctoral dissertation on the foundations of quantum theory isolates and then formalizes a physically relevant concept that I have called "Epistemic Constraint." Here, epistemic constraints are the definite, intersubjectively agreeable, ordinary-language conditions under which experiments are described. The usual formulation of the quantum measurement problem, which I call the Schrodingerian measurement problem, has the structure of an anomaly: if we take quantum theory at face value, we expect no definite values, and yet we see definite values in experiments. The responses to this problem have been either to solve it or to dissolve it. These responses, which have taken the form of interpretation, modification, or reconstruction of quantum mechanics, seek either to derive (conceptually or mathematically) epistemic constraints from within quantum mechanics or suitable modifications of it, as is the case with certain interpretations and modifications, or to posit the epistemic constraint, or parts of it, as a primitive assumption with the goal of deriving quantum mechanics, as is the case in some reconstruction programs. In contrast to the Schrodingerian measurement problem, which had the structure of an anomaly, this dissertation develops the Bohrian Program, which (for lack of a better comparison) has a structure similar to the problem historically associated with Euclid's fifth postulate. It seeks to keep epistemic constraints as primitive in an onto-epistemic sense. It then seeks new physical conclusions from the joint consideration of quantum mechanics and epistemic constraints, without seeking to derive one from the other. Among other results, this leads to a notion of the probability of instantiability of the Born Rule that specifies when to apply the Born Rule and when to apply a unitary transformation to a quantum state.

Related papers

• No Cloning of Quantum Ensembles [12.972500817229978]
  Modern quantum physics enables control of quantum systems at the level of individual trajectories, opening a new frontier that links quantum information theory, quantum many-body physics, and quantum thermodynamics.<n>Their characterization relies on measuring nonlinear properties of individual quantum states, a task tantamount to fine-grained cloning of a quantum ensemble.<n>Here, the fundamental laws governing the cloning of quantum ensembles are investigated.<n>Results establish new fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, reveal intrinsic trade-offs among sample complexity, computational complexity, and quantum measurements, and highlight the necessity of problem-specific strategies for probing measurement-induced quantum phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T06:24:03Z)
• Quantum Field-Theoretic Predictions of Ψ-Epistemic Models of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  $$-epistemic models of quantum mechanics imply that the quantum state does not correspond to physical reality.<n>We show that $$-epistemic models can give rise to deviations from standard quantum field-theoretic predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T15:07:21Z)
• A decision-theoretic approach to dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics [39.146761527401424]
  We provide a decision-theoretic framework for dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics.<n>We show that measurements play the role of acts with an uncertain outcome.<n>We discuss the mathematical implications of our findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T14:53:06Z)
• Causality and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics [3.3658137216733253]
  Based on quantum field theory, our work provides a framework that harmoniously integrates relativistic causality, quantum non-locality, and quantum measurement.<n>We use reduced density matrices to represent the local information of the quantum state and show that the reduced density matrices cannot evolve superluminally.<n>This viewpoint leads us to question the validity of the Schrodinger's cat paradox and motivates us to propose an interpretation of quantum mechanics that requires no extra assumptions and remains fully compatible with relativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T07:07:22Z)
• Error and Disturbance as Irreversibility with Applications: Unified Definition, Wigner--Araki--Yanase Theorem and Out-of-Time-Order Correlator [0.0]
  We apply knowledge of irreversibility in thermodynamics and quantum information theory to the error and disturbance in quantum measurements. We extend the quantitative Wigner--Araki--Yanase theorem to errors and disturbances of arbitrary definitions and processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T14:29:31Z)
• The measurement problem in the light of the theory of decoherence [0.0]
  This paper proposes an exhaustive solution to the measurement problem in view of the theory of decoherence. Considering the latter as a probabilistic theory all along allows us to avoid the usual probability problem of the many-worlds interpretations. A thorough verification of the consistency of quantum mechanics at all scales is proposed, as well as a discussion of what can be deemed an observer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T19:47:52Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Quantum Causal Inference in the Presence of Hidden Common Causes: an Entropic Approach [34.77250498401055]
  We put forth a new theoretical framework for merging quantum information science and causal inference by exploiting entropic principles. We apply our proposed framework to an experimentally relevant scenario of identifying message senders on quantum noisy links. This approach can lay the foundations of identifying originators of malicious activity on future multi-node quantum networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-24T22:45:50Z)
• Standard Quantum Mechanics without observers [0.0]
  The Projection Postulate from Standard Quantum Mechanics relies fundamentally on measurements. measurements implicitly suggest the existence of anthropocentric notions like measuring devices. This article proposes an alternative formulation of the Standard Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-11T18:01:15Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
• The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics [0.0]
  We show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta. We discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and'measurement' We show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-01T17:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.