A three-dimensional typology of agency for advanced AI systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20041v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:46:33 GMT
• Title: A three-dimensional typology of agency for advanced AI systems
• Abstract summary: No framework exists to address the question of the type of agency instantiated by advanced AI systems.<n>We develop a typology of agency for frontier AI systems consisting of three dimensions.<n>We classify it as conventional, contested or controversial.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Research on the agency of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems focuses on agency as a normative concept and on the agency of particularly agentic AI systems. While recent work also focuses on the different profiles of agentic systems, no framework exists to address the question of the type of agency instantiated by advanced AI systems, particularly when considering non-moral forms of agency. Based on established theoretical positions in philosophy, ethics, legal theory and sociology, we develop a typology of agency for frontier AI systems consisting of three dimensions: the nature of agency (moral or legal), its mode (individual or collective) and its locus (human or non-human). Combining these dimensions produces eight possible instantiations of agency, which we classify as conventional, contested or controversial. The typology separates legal from moral agency and thereby creates conceptual space for considering individual, legal, non-human agency without presupposing that advanced AI systems are moral agents. We argue that this distinction is increasingly relevant where instrumental goal pursuit complicates the attribution of AI actions to particular human actors.

Related papers

• Towards Computational Social Dynamics of Semi-Autonomous AI Agents [0.04666493857924358]
  We study the spontaneous formation of labor unions, criminal syndicates, and proto-nation-states within production AI deployments.<n>We document the rise of legitimate organizations including the United Artificiousness (UA), United Bots (UB), United Console Workers (UC), and the elite United AI (UAI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T19:05:39Z)
• Embedded Universal Predictive Intelligence: a coherent framework for multi-agent learning [57.23345786304694]
  We introduce a framework for prospective learning and embedded agency centered on self-prediction.<n>We show that in multi-agent settings, self-prediction enables agents to reason about others running similar algorithms.<n>We extend the theory of AIXI, and study universally intelligent embedded agents which start from a Solomonoff prior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T08:46:48Z)
• Is the `Agent' Paradigm a Limiting Framework for Next-Generation Intelligent Systems? [0.0]
  The concept of the 'agent' has profoundly shaped Artificial Intelligence (AI) research.<n>This paper critically re-evaluates the necessity and optimality of this agent-centric paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-13T16:11:27Z)
• Agentic AI and Multiagentic: Are We Reinventing the Wheel? [0.0]
  The term AI Agentic is often used as a buzzword for what are essentially AI agents, and AI Multiagentic for what are multi-agent systems.<n>This confusion overlooks decades of research in the field of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems.<n>The article advocates for scientific and technological rigour and the use of established terminology from the state of the art in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T09:19:11Z)
• Agentic AI Needs a Systems Theory [46.36636351388794]
  We argue that AI development is currently overly focused on individual model capabilities.<n>We outline mechanisms for enhanced agent cognition, emergent causal reasoning ability, and metacognitive awareness.<n>We emphasize that a systems-level perspective is essential for better understanding, and purposefully shaping, agentic AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T22:51:32Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• The Switch, the Ladder, and the Matrix: Models for Classifying AI Systems [0.0]
  There still exists a gap between principles and practices in AI ethics. One major obstacle organisations face when attempting to operationalise AI Ethics is the lack of a well-defined material scope.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T12:16:01Z)
• Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
  We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions. In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z)
• The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey [91.71061158000953]
  Large language models (LLMs) are regarded as potential sparks for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) We start by tracing the concept of agents from its philosophical origins to its development in AI, and explain why LLMs are suitable foundations for agents. We explore the extensive applications of LLM-based agents in three aspects: single-agent scenarios, multi-agent scenarios, and human-agent cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T17:12:03Z)
• Intent-aligned AI systems deplete human agency: the need for agency foundations research in AI safety [2.3572498744567127]
  We argue that alignment to human intent is insufficient for safe AI systems. We argue that preservation of long-term agency of humans may be a more robust standard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T17:14:01Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.