A Dataset-Centric Benchmark of Deep Learning Methods for Grape Leaf Disease Classification and Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20608v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 23:17:09 GMT
- Title: A Dataset-Centric Benchmark of Deep Learning Methods for Grape Leaf Disease Classification and Detection
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a dataset-centric benchmark of deep learning methods for grape leaf disease classification and detection.<n>We analyze publicly available datasets in terms of disease categories, annotation types, acquisition conditions, image characteristics, class distributions, provenance, and task suitability.<n>Results show near-saturated classification performance on several controlled or derivative datasets, greater difficulty on heterogeneous datasets, and substantial variation in detection performance across annotation settings.
- Score: 0.815557531820863
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Grape leaf disease recognition is important for precision agriculture, enabling early diagnosis, timely intervention, and improved vineyard management. Although deep learning has achieved strong results, many studies rely on few datasets, often acquired under controlled conditions, and may not reflect real vineyard challenges such as complex backgrounds, variable illumination, occlusion, leaf pose, disease severity, and device differences. This paper presents a dataset-centric benchmark of deep learning methods for grape leaf disease classification and detection. We analyze publicly available datasets in terms of disease categories, annotation types, acquisition conditions, image characteristics, class distributions, provenance, and task suitability. Representative models are evaluated in three settings: image-level classification, region-level classification, and object detection. Classification is assessed using accuracy, while detection is evaluated using mAP@50 and mAP@50:95. Cross-dataset experiments further examine transfer between datasets with compatible disease categories but different visual and annotation characteristics. Results show near-saturated classification performance on several controlled or derivative datasets, greater difficulty on heterogeneous datasets, and substantial variation in detection performance across annotation settings. Cross-dataset performance drops sharply, especially for object detection, indicating that shared disease labels do not necessarily define equivalent recognition tasks. The benchmark emphasizes dataset provenance, realistic field evaluation, annotation compatibility, and external validation for reliable vineyard disease recognition.
Related papers
- DDD: Discriminative Difficulty Distance for plant disease diagnosis [2.7992435001846827]
Plant disease diagnosis presents a challenging classification task.<n>Discriminative Difficulty Distance (DDD) is a novel metric designed to quantify the domain gap between training and test datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-01T05:34:59Z) - Data Augmentation through Background Removal for Apple Leaf Disease Classification Using the MobileNetV2 Model [0.0]
The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a data augmentation approach on the classification performance of apple leaf diseases in images captured under real world conditions.<n>The proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 98.71% on the Plant Pathology database, representing an approximately 3% improvement and outperforming state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-29T16:06:34Z) - Unlearnable Examples Detection via Iterative Filtering [84.59070204221366]
Deep neural networks are proven to be vulnerable to data poisoning attacks.
It is quite beneficial and challenging to detect poisoned samples from a mixed dataset.
We propose an Iterative Filtering approach for UEs identification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-15T13:26:13Z) - Benchmarking In-the-wild Multimodal Disease Recognition and A Versatile Baseline [42.49727243388804]
We propose an in-the-wild multimodal plant disease recognition dataset.
It contains the largest number of disease classes but also text-based descriptions for each disease.
Our proposed dataset can be regarded as an ideal testbed for evaluating disease recognition methods in the real world.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-06T11:49:13Z) - Multi-task Explainable Skin Lesion Classification [54.76511683427566]
We propose a few-shot-based approach for skin lesions that generalizes well with few labelled data.
The proposed approach comprises a fusion of a segmentation network that acts as an attention module and classification network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T05:49:47Z) - Enhancing Fine-Grained Classification for Low Resolution Images [97.82441158440527]
Low resolution images suffer from the inherent challenge of limited information content and the absence of fine details useful for sub-category classification.
This research proposes a novel attribute-assisted loss, which utilizes ancillary information to learn discriminative features for classification.
The proposed loss function enables a model to learn class-specific discriminative features, while incorporating attribute-level separability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-01T13:19:02Z) - Leaf Image-based Plant Disease Identification using Color and Texture
Features [0.1657441317977376]
The accuracy on a self-collected dataset is 82.47% for disease identification and 91.40% for healthy and diseased classification.
This prototype system can be extended by adding more disease categories or targeting specific crop or disease categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T20:32:56Z) - Multi-label Thoracic Disease Image Classification with Cross-Attention
Networks [65.37531731899837]
We propose a novel scheme of Cross-Attention Networks (CAN) for automated thoracic disease classification from chest x-ray images.
We also design a new loss function that beyond cross-entropy loss to help cross-attention process and is able to overcome the imbalance between classes and easy-dominated samples within each class.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-21T14:37:00Z) - Deep Mining External Imperfect Data for Chest X-ray Disease Screening [57.40329813850719]
We argue that incorporating an external CXR dataset leads to imperfect training data, which raises the challenges.
We formulate the multi-label disease classification problem as weighted independent binary tasks according to the categories.
Our framework simultaneously models and tackles the domain and label discrepancies, enabling superior knowledge mining ability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-06T06:48:40Z) - Semi-supervised Medical Image Classification with Relation-driven
Self-ensembling Model [71.80319052891817]
We present a relation-driven semi-supervised framework for medical image classification.
It exploits the unlabeled data by encouraging the prediction consistency of given input under perturbations.
Our method outperforms many state-of-the-art semi-supervised learning methods on both single-label and multi-label image classification scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-15T06:57:54Z) - An Extensive Study on Cross-Dataset Bias and Evaluation Metrics
Interpretation for Machine Learning applied to Gastrointestinal Tract
Abnormality Classification [2.985964157078619]
Automatic analysis of diseases in the GI tract is a hot topic in computer science and medical-related journals.
A clear understanding of evaluation metrics and machine learning models with cross datasets is crucial to bring research in the field to a new quality level.
We present comprehensive evaluations of five distinct machine learning models that can classify 16 different GI tract conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-08T08:59:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.