ConceptTS: LLM-Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21277v1
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 16:35:44 GMT
- Title: ConceptTS: LLM-Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting
- Abstract summary: ConceptTS is an interpretable forecasting framework that organizes its predictions around named, human-readable concepts.<n>A shared decoder combines representations derived from their predicted activations to construct the forecast.<n>Experiments on the Beijing Multi-Site Air Quality dataset show that ConceptTS achieves accuracy competitive with strong black-box baselines.
- Score: 5.864483407118622
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: State-of-the-art multivariate time-series forecasters can model complex temporal and cross-variable dependencies, yet their opaque representations provide limited insight into why a particular forecast is produced. This lack of transparency restricts their use in settings where practitioners must understand and assess the factors underlying a prediction. We introduce ConceptTS, an interpretable forecasting framework that organizes its predictions around named, human-readable concepts. ConceptTS uses a large language model to propose task-relevant concepts and generate executable labeling rules, translating the language model's domain knowledge into direct supervision without costly manual concept annotation. The proposed concepts are organized into three complementary bottlenecks that describe the historical context, local forecast intervals, and the full forecast horizon. A shared decoder combines representations derived from their predicted activations to construct the forecast, making the model's decision process explicit and supporting direct concept-level interventions. Experiments on the Beijing Multi-Site Air Quality dataset show that ConceptTS achieves accuracy competitive with strong black-box baselines while producing semantically meaningful concept activations.
Related papers
- Explaining CLIP Zero-shot Predictions Through Concepts [54.05282304471016]
We introduce EZPC to explain CLIP's zero-shot predictions through human-understandable concepts.<n>Our method projects CLIP's joint image-text embeddings into a concept space learned from language descriptions.<n>Our approach maintains CLIP's strong zero-shot classification accuracy while providing meaningful concept-level explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-30T09:31:33Z) - Hierarchical Concept-based Interpretable Models [23.16720677779406]
Concept Embedding Models (CEMs) map inputs to human-interpretable concept representations from which tasks can be predicted.<n>Yet, CEMs fail to represent inter-concept relationships and require concept annotations at different granularities during training.<n>We introduce Hierarchical Concept Embedding Models (HiCEMs), a new family of CEMs that explicitly model concept relationships through hierarchical structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T11:49:56Z) - Insight: Interpretable Semantic Hierarchies in Vision-Language Encoders [52.94006363830628]
Language-aligned vision foundation models perform strongly across diverse downstream tasks.<n>Recent works decompose these representations into human-interpretable concepts, but provide poor spatial grounding and are limited to image classification tasks.<n>We propose Insight, a language-aligned concept foundation model that provides fine-grained concepts, which are human-interpretable and spatially grounded in the input image.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-20T09:57:26Z) - FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network Decisions [56.796533084868884]
Deep networks have shown remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, yet getting a global concept-level understanding of how they function remains a key challenge.<n>We put emphasis on the faithfulness of concept-based explanations and propose a new model with model-inherent mechanistic concept-explanations.<n>Our concepts are shared across classes and, from any layer, their contribution to the logit and their input-visualization can be faithfully traced.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-29T13:35:46Z) - Towards more holistic interpretability: A lightweight disentangled Concept Bottleneck Model [5.700536552863068]
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) enhance interpretability by predicting human-understandable concepts as intermediate representations.<n>We propose a lightweight Disentangled Concept Bottleneck Model (LDCBM) that automatically groups visual features into semantically meaningful components.<n> Experiments on three diverse datasets demonstrate that LDCBM achieves higher concept and class accuracy, outperforming previous CBMs in both interpretability and classification performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-17T15:59:30Z) - Adaptive Test-Time Intervention for Concept Bottleneck Models [6.31833744906105]
Concept bottleneck models (CBM) aim to improve model interpretability by predicting human level "concepts"<n>We propose to use Fast Interpretable Greedy Sum-Trees (FIGS) to obtain Binary Distillation (BD)<n>FIGS-BD distills a binary-augmented concept-to-target portion of the CBM into an interpretable tree-based model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-09T19:03:48Z) - LLM Pretraining with Continuous Concepts [71.98047075145249]
Next token prediction has been the standard training objective used in large language model pretraining.<n>We propose Continuous Concept Mixing (CoCoMix), a novel pretraining framework that combines discrete next token prediction with continuous concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-12T16:00:11Z) - Bayesian Concept Bottleneck Models with LLM Priors [8.895722261818209]
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have been proposed as a compromise between white-box and black-box models, aiming to achieve interpretability without sacrificing accuracy.<n>This work investigates a novel approach that sidesteps these challenges: BC-LLM iteratively searches over a potentially infinite set of concepts within a Bayesian framework, in which Large Language Models (LLMs) serve as both a concept extraction mechanism and prior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T01:00:33Z) - MulCPred: Learning Multi-modal Concepts for Explainable Pedestrian Action Prediction [57.483718822429346]
MulCPred is proposed that explains its predictions based on multi-modal concepts represented by training samples.
MulCPred is evaluated on multiple datasets and tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-14T14:15:28Z) - Linearly-Interpretable Concept Embedding Models for Text Analysis [9.340843984411137]
We propose a novel Linearly Interpretable Concept Embedding Model (LICEM)<n>LICEMs classification accuracy is better than existing interpretable models and matches black-box ones.<n>We show that the explanations provided by our models are more interveneable and causally consistent with respect to existing solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T14:04:53Z) - ConcEPT: Concept-Enhanced Pre-Training for Language Models [57.778895980999124]
ConcEPT aims to infuse conceptual knowledge into pre-trained language models.
It exploits external entity concept prediction to predict the concepts of entities mentioned in the pre-training contexts.
Results of experiments show that ConcEPT gains improved conceptual knowledge with concept-enhanced pre-training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-11T05:05:01Z) - GlanceNets: Interpretabile, Leak-proof Concept-based Models [23.7625973884849]
Concept-based models (CBMs) combine high-performance and interpretability by acquiring and reasoning with a vocabulary of high-level concepts.
We provide a clear definition of interpretability in terms of alignment between the model's representation and an underlying data generation process.
We introduce GlanceNets, a new CBM that exploits techniques from disentangled representation learning and open-set recognition to achieve alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-31T08:53:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.