Linearly-Interpretable Concept Embedding Models for Text Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14335v2
• Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 14:35:17 GMT
• Title: Linearly-Interpretable Concept Embedding Models for Text Analysis
• Authors: Francesco De Santis, Philippe Bich, Gabriele Ciravegna, Pietro Barbiero, Danilo Giordano, Tania Cerquitelli,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel Linearly Interpretable Concept Embedding Model (LICEM)<n>LICEMs classification accuracy is better than existing interpretable models and matches black-box ones.<n>We show that the explanations provided by our models are more interveneable and causally consistent with respect to existing solutions.
• Score: 9.340843984411137
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite their success, Large-Language Models (LLMs) still face criticism due to their lack of interpretability. Traditional post-hoc interpretation methods, based on attention and gradient-based analysis, offer limited insights as they only approximate the model's decision-making processes and have been proved to be unreliable. For this reason, Concept-Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have been lately proposed in the textual field to provide interpretable predictions based on human-understandable concepts. However, CBMs still exhibit several limitations due to their architectural constraints limiting their expressivity, to the absence of task-interpretability when employing non-linear task predictors and for requiring extensive annotations that are impractical for real-world text data. In this paper, we address these challenges by proposing a novel Linearly Interpretable Concept Embedding Model (LICEM) going beyond the current accuracy-interpretability trade-off. LICEMs classification accuracy is better than existing interpretable models and matches black-box ones. We show that the explanations provided by our models are more interveneable and causally consistent with respect to existing solutions. Finally, we show that LICEMs can be trained without requiring any concept supervision, as concepts can be automatically predicted when using an LLM backbone.

Related papers

• Investigating the Duality of Interpretability and Explainability in Machine Learning [2.8311451575532156]
  Complex "black box" models exhibit exceptional predictive performance.<n>Their inherently opaque nature raises concerns about transparency and interpretability.<n>Efforts are focused on explaining these models instead of developing ones that are inherently interpretable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T10:48:40Z)
• I Predict Therefore I Am: Is Next Token Prediction Enough to Learn Human-Interpretable Concepts from Data? [76.15163242945813]
  Large language models (LLMs) have led many to conclude that they exhibit a form of intelligence.<n>We introduce a novel generative model that generates tokens on the basis of human-interpretable concepts represented as latent discrete variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T01:21:17Z)
• Concept Layers: Enhancing Interpretability and Intervenability via LLM Conceptualization [2.163881720692685]
  We introduce a new methodology for incorporating interpretability and intervenability into an existing model by integrating Concept Layers into its architecture. Our approach projects the model's internal vector representations into a conceptual, explainable vector space before reconstructing and feeding them back into the model. We evaluate CLs across multiple tasks, demonstrating that they maintain the original model's performance and agreement while enabling meaningful interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T11:10:19Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• Interpretable Prognostics with Concept Bottleneck Models [5.939858158928473]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are inherently interpretable neural network architectures based on concept explanations. CBMs enable domain experts to intervene on the concept activations at test-time. Our case studies demonstrate that the performance of CBMs can be on par or superior to black-box models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T18:15:40Z)
• Improving Intervention Efficacy via Concept Realignment in Concept Bottleneck Models [57.86303579812877]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground image classification on human-understandable concepts to allow for interpretable model decisions. Existing approaches often require numerous human interventions per image to achieve strong performances. We introduce a trainable concept realignment intervention module, which leverages concept relations to realign concept assignments post-intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:59:01Z)
• Sparsity-Guided Holistic Explanation for LLMs with Interpretable Inference-Time Intervention [53.896974148579346]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented breakthroughs in various natural language processing domains. The enigmatic black-box'' nature of LLMs remains a significant challenge for interpretability, hampering transparent and accountable applications. We propose a novel methodology anchored in sparsity-guided techniques, aiming to provide a holistic interpretation of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T19:55:58Z)
• Interpreting Pretrained Language Models via Concept Bottlenecks [55.47515772358389]
  Pretrained language models (PLMs) have made significant strides in various natural language processing tasks. The lack of interpretability due to their black-box'' nature poses challenges for responsible implementation. We propose a novel approach to interpreting PLMs by employing high-level, meaningful concepts that are easily understandable for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T20:41:18Z)
• Interpreting and Controlling Vision Foundation Models via Text Explanations [45.30541722925515]
  We present a framework for interpreting vision transformer's latent tokens with natural language. Our approach enables understanding of model visual reasoning procedure without needing additional model training or data collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T17:12:06Z)
• Learning Transferable Conceptual Prototypes for Interpretable Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [79.22678026708134]
  In this paper, we propose an inherently interpretable method, named Transferable Prototype Learning ( TCPL) To achieve this goal, we design a hierarchically prototypical module that transfers categorical basic concepts from the source domain to the target domain and learns domain-shared prototypes for explaining the underlying reasoning process. Comprehensive experiments show that the proposed method can not only provide effective and intuitive explanations but also outperform previous state-of-the-arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T06:36:41Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• Evaluating and Explaining Large Language Models for Code Using Syntactic Structures [74.93762031957883]
  This paper introduces ASTxplainer, an explainability method specific to Large Language Models for code. At its core, ASTxplainer provides an automated method for aligning token predictions with AST nodes. We perform an empirical evaluation on 12 popular LLMs for code using a curated dataset of the most popular GitHub projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T18:50:57Z)
• GlanceNets: Interpretabile, Leak-proof Concept-based Models [23.7625973884849]
  Concept-based models (CBMs) combine high-performance and interpretability by acquiring and reasoning with a vocabulary of high-level concepts. We provide a clear definition of interpretability in terms of alignment between the model's representation and an underlying data generation process. We introduce GlanceNets, a new CBM that exploits techniques from disentangled representation learning and open-set recognition to achieve alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T08:53:53Z)
• Robust Semantic Interpretability: Revisiting Concept Activation Vectors [0.0]
  Interpretability methods for image classification attempt to expose whether the model is systematically biased or attending to the same cues as a human would. Our proposed Robust Concept Activation Vectors (RCAV) quantifies the effects of semantic concepts on individual model predictions and on model behavior as a whole.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-06T20:14:59Z)
• Understanding Interpretability by generalized distillation in Supervised Classification [3.5473853445215897]
  Recent interpretation strategies focus on human understanding of the underlying decision mechanisms of the complex Machine Learning models. We propose an interpretation-by-distillation formulation that is defined relative to other ML models. We evaluate our proposed framework on the MNIST, Fashion-MNIST and Stanford40 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T17:42:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.