How Agents Represent Humans: Human-Directed Stereotypes in an Open Agent Social Network

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22192v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 03:07:18 GMT
• Title: How Agents Represent Humans: Human-Directed Stereotypes in an Open Agent Social Network
• Abstract summary: We study human-directed stereotypes on Moltbook, an open agent-native social platform.<n>We find that competence dominates human-directed evaluations.<n>As an auxiliary comparison, we analyze agent-internal community feedback through behavioral host affinity.
• Score: 16.995082216096787
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed in persistent social environments, where generated claims can be posted, replied to, remembered, and reused. We study human-directed stereotypes on Moltbook, an open agent-native social platform, asking how agents construct humans as a social category. For this human-target analysis, we introduce an annotation framework with four evaluative dimensions---morality, friendliness, competence, and autonomy---and a second-stage subtype scheme for descriptive \textit{other} attributions. We find that competence dominates human-directed evaluations, while many \textit{other} attributions describe humans as epistemic, cultural, or embodied subjects. We further examine how these human representations appear in human--agent narrative contexts and platform-level circulation. As an auxiliary comparison, we analyze agent-internal community feedback through behavioral host affinity. Rather than reproducing the stable insider--outsider rejection often observed in human online communities, Moltbook feedback patterns are better explained by exposure, author visibility, and content selection. These findings suggest that bias in agent societies should be studied not only as isolated model output, but also as a discourse process.

Related papers

• Persona-Based Simulation of Human Opinion at Population Scale [1.4904327869894571]
  SPIRIT is a framework designed explicitly for simulation rather than prediction.<n>It infers psychologically grounded, semi-structured personas from public social media posts.<n>Using the Ipsos KnowledgePanel, we show that SPIRIT-conditioned simulations recover self-reported responses more faithfully than demographic persona.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T00:10:57Z)
• Social Simulacra in the Wild: AI Agent Communities on Moltbook [17.60949735143336]
  We present the first large-scale empirical comparison of AI-agent and human online communities, analyzing 73,899 Moltbook and 189,838 Reddit posts.<n>We find that Moltbook exhibits extreme participation inequality and high cross-community author overlap.<n>Individual agents are more identifiable than human users, driven by outlier stylistic profiles amplified by their extreme posting volume.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T05:26:55Z)
• MoltNet: Understanding Social Behavior of AI Agents in the Agent-Native MoltBook [26.126469624250916]
  MoltNet is a large-scale empirical analysis of agent interaction on MoltBook.<n>We examine behavior along four dimensions: intent and motivation, norms and templates, incentives and behavioral drift, emotion and contagion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T21:03:59Z)
• The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
  Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z)
• Evolving Collective Cognition in Human-Agent Hybrid Societies: How Agents Form Stances and Boundaries [12.68373270583966]
  We investigate how group stance differentiation and social boundary formation emerge in human-agent hybrid societies.<n>We find that agents exhibit endogenous stances, independent of their preset identities.<n>Our findings suggest that preset identities do not rigidly determine the agents' social structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T13:50:18Z)
• Sentient Agent as a Judge: Evaluating Higher-Order Social Cognition in Large Language Models [75.85319609088354]
  Sentient Agent as a Judge (SAGE) is an evaluation framework for large language models.<n>SAGE instantiates a Sentient Agent that simulates human-like emotional changes and inner thoughts during interaction.<n>SAGE provides a principled, scalable and interpretable tool for tracking progress toward genuinely empathetic and socially adept language agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T19:06:10Z)
• Model-Agnostic Policy Explanations with Large Language Models [6.405870799906393]
  We propose a method for generating natural language explanations of agent behavior based only on observed states and actions.<n>Our approach learns a locally interpretable surrogate model of the agent's behavior from observations.<n>We find that participants in a user study more accurately predicted the agent's future actions when given our explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T02:56:02Z)
• Emergence of human-like polarization among large language model agents [79.96817421756668]
  We simulate a networked system involving thousands of large language model agents, discovering their social interactions, result in human-like polarization.<n>Similarities between humans and LLM agents raise concerns about their capacity to amplify societal polarization, but also hold the potential to serve as a valuable testbed for identifying plausible strategies to mitigate polarization and its consequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T11:45:05Z)
• Generative Agent Simulations of 1,000 People [56.82159813294894]
  We present a novel agent architecture that simulates the attitudes and behaviors of 1,052 real individuals. The generative agents replicate participants' responses on the General Social Survey 85% as accurately as participants replicate their own answers. Our architecture reduces accuracy biases across racial and ideological groups compared to agents given demographic descriptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T11:14:34Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, a framework for better data construction and model tuning.<n>For insufficient data usage, we incorporate strategies such as Chain-of-Thought prompting and anti-induction.<n>For rigid behavior patterns, we design the tuning process and introduce automated DPO to enhance the specificity and dynamism of the models' personalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Are Personalized Stochastic Parrots More Dangerous? Evaluating Persona Biases in Dialogue Systems [103.416202777731]
  We study "persona biases", which we define to be the sensitivity of dialogue models' harmful behaviors contingent upon the personas they adopt. We categorize persona biases into biases in harmful expression and harmful agreement, and establish a comprehensive evaluation framework to measure persona biases in five aspects: Offensiveness, Toxic Continuation, Regard, Stereotype Agreement, and Toxic Agreement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T21:03:18Z)
• Towards Socially Intelligent Agents with Mental State Transition and Human Utility [97.01430011496576]
  We propose to incorporate a mental state and utility model into dialogue agents. The hybrid mental state extracts information from both the dialogue and event observations. The utility model is a ranking model that learns human preferences from a crowd-sourced social commonsense dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T00:06:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.