Does Probability Require a Single History?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22733v3
• Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 02:19:36 GMT
• Title: Does Probability Require a Single History?
• Abstract summary: A collapse law assigns the same probabilities to possible global outcomes.<n>I relate this minimal proposal to earlier axiomatic accounts, separate it from their accompanying theories of personal persistence.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Everettian quantum mechanics is often said to lack coherent probability because every possible measurement result occurs. If all of them exist globally, what is probability supposed to be a probability of? This paper defends an axiomatic answer: normalized Born measure is postulated as objective probability over the records borne by an observer's future continuations. A collapse law assigns the same probabilities to possible global outcomes. Neither theory derives the probabilities from its ontology. I relate this minimal proposal to earlier axiomatic accounts, separate it from their accompanying theories of personal persistence, and defend it against recent arguments that the axiomatic route cannot succeed. At the level of recorded results, the Everettian law supports the same predictions and empirical inferences as the collapse law, despite the theories' different ontologies.

Related papers

• How to Verify Consistency of Probabilistic Claims [49.47758039235095]
  We construct an interactive PCP to prove a predictive model's consistency.<n>We show how a small additive-soundness gap removes dependence on B.<n>We view our interactive PCP as a first step toward predictive models to prove their own consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T17:41:39Z)
• Does Born Rule Imply Unitarity of Time Evolution in Quantum Mechanics? [0.0]
  The Born rule for computing probabilities of the outcomes of measurements is an indispensable ingredient of quantum mechanics.<n>We show that this expression for the Born rule ensures the conservation of total probabilities even when the dynamics of a quantum system is not unitary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T15:52:47Z)
• On the evolution of the concept of probability as a mirror of the evolution of reason [31.458406135473805]
  Article interprets that evolution not merely as a mathematical history, but as a transformation of rationality itself.<n>Probability theory has grown from the calculus of games of chance into a central framework for reasoning under uncertainty.<n> Fuzzy logic is presented as a rigorous language for graded meaning and qualitative judgment, while deep learning is analyzed as a powerful mode of prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T08:58:53Z)
• Many Retrocausal Worlds: A Foundation for Quantum Probability [1.5229257192293202]
  Recent accounts of probability in the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics are vulnerable due to their dependence on probability theory per se.<n>I argue that self-locating probabilities centered in time-extended worlds can solve the incoherence problem.<n>I then outline a time-symmetric version of quantum mechanics - the Fixed Point Formulation - which, interpreted within a time-symmetric Everettian framework, can provide the foundation for a theory of quantum probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T19:21:08Z)
• Testing trajectory-based determinism via time probability distributions [41.99844472131922]
  We introduce a prescription for constructing an arrival-time probability distribution within generic trajectory-equipped theories.<n>We derive a conditional probability distribution that is unreachable by quantum mechanics.<n>Our results can be tested experimentally, thereby assessing the validity of trajectory-based determinism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T11:36:38Z)
• Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [45.76759085727843]
  Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics.<n>It allows to model situations where the order of observations does not matter.<n>It is well known that both theorems do not hold for finitely exchangeable sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z)
• A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
  We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z)
• Reconciling Individual Probability Forecasts [78.0074061846588]
  We show that two parties who agree on the data cannot disagree on how to model individual probabilities. We conclude that although individual probabilities are unknowable, they are contestable via a computationally and data efficient process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T20:20:35Z)
• Law of Total Probability in Quantum Theory and Its Application in Wigner's Friend Scenario [0.0]
  It is well-known that the law of total probability does not hold in general in quantum theory. In this work, the definition of conditional probability in quantum theory is extended to POVM measurements. Applying the theory developed here to analyze several quantum no-go theorems related to the extended Wigner's friend scenario reveals logical loopholes in these no-go theorems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-24T18:59:55Z)
• Branch-counting in the Everett Interpretation of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  Well-known branch-counting rule, for realistic models of measurements, fails this test. New rule hinges on the use of decoherence theory in defining branching structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-16T16:50:07Z)
• Bayesianism, Conditional Probability and Laplace Law of Succession in Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We show that as with the classical probability, all these issues can be resolved affirmatively in the quantum probability.<n>This implies that the relation between the Bayesian probability and the relative frequency in quantum mechanics is the same as that in the classical probability theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T04:55:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.