Object Counting Across Modalities: Taxonomies, Benchmarks, Applications, and Open Challenges
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23845v1
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:32:56 GMT
- Title: Object Counting Across Modalities: Taxonomies, Benchmarks, Applications, and Open Challenges
- Abstract summary: We propose a roadmap for compositional scene understanding, active counting agents, and unified multimodal evaluation protocols.<n>The main imperative is to build a robust evaluation infrastructure to distinguish open-world generalization from benchmark-specific optimization.
- Score: 3.1411048327150546
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Object-counting methods have rapidly shifted from class-specific density regression to open-vocabulary, foundation-model-backed counters. These methods now enumerate instances from various visual and textual prompts. While this shift marks major conceptual progress, our survey argues that claims of universal generality have outpaced the evaluative infrastructure. Most progress metrics rely on a few saturated benchmarks that models exploit for statistical regularities. Newly introduced diagnostic datasets reveal systematic failures in semantic grounding, temporal identity, and spatial reasoning with occlusion. To address these failures, we introduce a five-axis taxonomy (modality, mechanism, prompting, supervision level, and generalization setting). We use this taxonomy to audit the literature across application domains, including microscopy, remote sensing, crowd counting, and agriculture. This formalizes prevailing challenges into six structural contradictions. From these, we propose a roadmap for compositional scene understanding, active counting agents, and unified multimodal evaluation protocols. The main imperative is to build a robust evaluation infrastructure to distinguish open-world generalization from benchmark-specific optimization, rather than simple incremental engineering.
Related papers
- Towards Diverse and Comprehensive Benchmarks for Mutual Information Estimation [47.29900218955283]
Mutual information estimation is a central problem in machine learning and statistics.<n>Existing benchmarks evaluate estimators on simplified, low-dimensional distributions, leaving their performance on complex, realistic data largely unexplored.<n>We address this gap with a comprehensive benchmarking framework grounded in a unified copula-theoretic perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-03T16:55:55Z) - Facial Expression Recognition in the Deep Learning Era: A Systematic Multi-Criteria Review of Methods, Models, Datasets, Performance, Challenges, and Future Research Directions [5.547573358033218]
Facial Expression Recognition (FER) has advanced rapidly over the last decade.<n>The deep learning-based FER landscape has so far been reviewed only along narrow task-, architecture-, or application-specific axes.<n>This survey addresses that gap with a comprehensive review of recent deep learning-based FER.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-07T12:58:33Z) - The Crowded Embedding Space: A Mean-Field Mechanism for Emergent Marginalization in Retrieval-Augmented Agents [51.56484100374058]
We show that the high document density required to serve majority interests can geometrically overcrowd the retrieval neighborhood of a semantically similar minority.<n>We introduce a formal framework to analyze how such goal collisions in dense retrieval induce fundamental performance limits.<n>We prove that such objectives drive the system to self-organize into a state that exclusively serves majority interests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-01T20:40:30Z) - DocRetriever: A Plug-and-Play Framework for Multimodal Document Retrieval with Comprehensive Benchmark [48.84943754804533]
Multimodal documents contain diverse elements, such as tables, figures, and layouts.<n>Current approaches typically combine dense visual embedding models with supervised rerankers to achieve high-precision retrieval.<n>We propose DocRetriever, a plug-and-play framework that enhances visual retrieval via a layout-aware sparse embedding technique.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T14:50:53Z) - Reasoning-Driven Amodal Completion: Collaborative Agents and Perceptual Evaluation [17.405818788700234]
We present a Collaborative Multi-Agent Reasoning Framework that explicitly decouples Semantic Planning from Visual Synthesis.<n>Our method generates a structured, explicit plan before pixel generation, enabling visually and semantically coherent single-pass synthesis.<n>Addressing the limitations of traditional metrics in assessing inferred invisible content, we introduce the MAC-Score, a novel human-aligned evaluation metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-24T04:39:45Z) - Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoning [74.27548620675748]
Compositional visual reasoning has emerged as a key research frontier in multimodal AI.<n>This survey systematically reviews 260+ papers from top venues (CVPR, ICCV, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL, etc.)<n>We then catalog 60+ benchmarks and corresponding metrics that probe compositional visual reasoning along dimensions such as grounding accuracy, chain-of-thought faithfulness, and high-resolution perception.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-24T11:01:51Z) - Towards Explainable Deep Clustering for Time Series Data [5.031537780234399]
This survey offers a structured overview of explainable deep clustering for time series.<n>Our analysis reveals that most work relies on autoencoder and attention architectures, with limited support for streaming, irregularly sampled, or privacy-preserved series.<n>To push the field forward, we outline six research opportunities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T13:50:10Z) - METER: Multi-modal Evidence-based Thinking and Explainable Reasoning -- Algorithm and Benchmark [48.78602579128459]
We introduce METER, a unified benchmark for interpretable forgery detection spanning images, videos, audio, and audio-visual content.<n>Our dataset comprises four tracks, each requiring not only real-vs-fake classification but also evidence-chain-based explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-22T03:42:51Z) - A Survey on Class-Agnostic Counting: Advancements from Reference-Based to Open-World Text-Guided Approaches [6.356364436395916]
We present the first comprehensive review of class-agnostic counting (CAC) methodologies.<n>We propose a taxonomy to categorize CAC approaches into three paradigms: reference-based, reference-less, and open-world text-guided.<n>We present results on the FSC-147 dataset, setting a leaderboard using gold-standard metrics, and on the CARPK dataset to assess generalization capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-31T14:47:09Z) - A Survey on All-in-One Image Restoration: Taxonomy, Evaluation and Future Trends [67.43992456058541]
Image restoration (IR) seeks to recover high-quality images from degraded observations caused by a wide range of factors, including noise, blur, compression, and adverse weather.<n>Traditional IR methods have made notable progress by targeting individual degradation types, but their specialization often comes at the cost of generalization.<n>The all-in-one image restoration paradigm has recently emerged, offering a unified framework that adeptly addresses multiple degradation types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-19T11:11:09Z) - Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs)
We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing.
We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.