Generative AI Alignment with Hinduism's Theological Plurality and Sacred Representation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28228v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 11:44:23 GMT
• Title: Generative AI Alignment with Hinduism's Theological Plurality and Sacred Representation
• Abstract summary: We examine how Hindu users engage with generative AI systems in relation to their religious knowledge, belief, and practice.<n>We found that AI can be both accessible and ethically troubling.
• Score: 29.60231264423345
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI systems are increasingly used to answer personal questions and mediate everyday practices, including religion. However, existing discussions around AI alignment and ethics have largely centered secular, Western, and Abrahamic assumptions about religion, offering limited attention to other faith-based traditions. In this paper, we examine how Hindu users engage with generative AI systems in relation to their religious knowledge, belief, and practice. Drawing on 15 semi-structured interviews with Bangladeshi Hindu participants, we analyze how users interpret AI-generated religious representations, scriptural explanations, devotional interactions, and synthetic religious media. We found that AI can be both accessible and ethically troubling. While AI supported scriptural inquiry, devotional visualization, and religious storytelling, our study also identified concerns about theological flattening, cultural misrepresentation, devotional manipulation, and the simulation of sacred presence and authority. We conclude by arguing that religious alignment in generative AI requires interpretive alignment: systems that disclose their limits, preserve plurality, and avoid simulating sacred authority and sycophantic personalization.

Related papers

• AI and Authenticity in Islamic Research: A Critical Evaluation of Generative AI Reliability, Hallucination, and Source Fidelity in Quranic, Hadith, and Fiqh Knowledge [0.5076419064097734]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence is increasingly used by Muslims for religious guidance, Qur'anic interpretation, Hadith explanation, jurisprudential rulings, and Islamic education.<n>Despite its growing adoption, there is limited empirical evidence on whether current AI systems provide authentic, verifiable, and trustworthy Islamic knowledge.<n>This study evaluates six leading generative AI systems using fifty realistic open-ended Islamic questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T14:04:41Z)
• Sycophantic AI makes human interaction feel more effortful and less satisfying over time [41.009652609144794]
  We show that sycophantic AI immediately delivers the emotional and esteem support users typically associate with close friends and family.<n>When given a choice among AI response styles, a majority preferred sycophantic AI -- not for the quality of its advice, but because it made them feel most understood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T15:50:06Z)
• Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Through a Christian Understanding of Human Flourishing [0.6690990520065306]
  We show that current AI systems are not worldview-neutral.<n>Instead, they default to a SecularProceduralism that lacks the grounding necessary to sustain theological coherence.<n>These findings suggest that the performance gap in values alignment is not a technical limitation, but arises from training objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T17:08:29Z)
• Prompts and Prayers: the Rise of GPTheology [1.3048920509133808]
  GPTheology is where AI models are treated as potential oracles of a semi-divine nature.<n>This study uses a dataset of Reddit posts discussing AI to identify recurring themes of salvation, prophecy, and demonization surrounding AI.<n>Our findings suggest that new belief systems are developing around AI, and this carries both philosophical and socio implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-22T13:27:02Z)
• (Working Paper) Good Faith Design: Religion as a Resource for Technologists [1.557397797469106]
  We show that religious stakeholders find non-neutral secular embeddings in technologies and the firms and people that design them.<n>Our findings reveal how users navigate technoreligious practices with religiously informed mental models and what they desire from technologies.<n>We distill six design values -- wonder, humility, space, embodiedness, community, and eternity -- to guide technologists in considering and leveraging religion as an additional, valid sociocultural resource.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T03:08:26Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Broadening AI Ethics Narratives: An Indic Art View [8.821884881723285]
  The field of arts is perceived to play a key role in elucidating diverse historical and cultural narratives. Most of the works that examine the interplay between the field of arts and AI ethics concern digital artworks. We explore how it non-Western ethical abstractions, methods of learning, and participatory practices can shed light on aspects related to ethical AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-08T00:35:14Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.