(Working Paper) Good Faith Design: Religion as a Resource for Technologists
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05819v1
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 03:08:26 GMT
- Title: (Working Paper) Good Faith Design: Religion as a Resource for Technologists
- Authors: Nina Lutz, Benjamin Olsen, Weishung Liu, E. Glen Weyl,
- Abstract summary: We show that religious stakeholders find non-neutral secular embeddings in technologies and the firms and people that design them.<n>Our findings reveal how users navigate technoreligious practices with religiously informed mental models and what they desire from technologies.<n>We distill six design values -- wonder, humility, space, embodiedness, community, and eternity -- to guide technologists in considering and leveraging religion as an additional, valid sociocultural resource.
- Score: 1.557397797469106
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Previous work has found a lack of research in HCI on religion, partly driven by misunderstandings of values and practices between religious and technical communities. To bridge this divide in an empirically rigorous way, we conducted an interview study with 48 religious people and/or experts from 11 faiths, and we document how religious people experience, understand, and imagine technologies. We show that religious stakeholders find non-neutral secular embeddings in technologies and the firms and people that design them, and how these manifest in unintended harms for religious and nonreligious users. Our findings reveal how users navigate technoreligious practices with religiously informed mental models and what they desire from technologies. Informed by this, we distill six design values -- wonder, humility, space, embodiedness, community, and eternity -- to guide technologists in considering and leveraging religion as an additional, valid sociocultural resource when designing for a holistic user. We further spell out directions for future research.
Related papers
- Folklore in Software Engineering: A Definition and Conceptual Foundations [2.203528070421802]
We explore the concept of folklore within software engineering, drawing from folklore studies to define and characterize narratives, myths, rituals, humor, and informal knowledge that circulate within software development communities.<n>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 industrial practitioners in Sweden to explore how such narratives are recognized or transmitted within their daily work and how they affect it.<n>We argue that making the concept of software engineering folklore explicit provides a foundation for subsequent ethnography and folklore studies and for reflective practice that can preserve context-effective exemplars while challenging unhelpful folklore.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T14:56:32Z) - Twenty Years of Personality Computing: Threats, Challenges and Future Directions [76.46813522861632]
Personality Computing is a field at the intersection of Personality Psychology and Computer Science.<n>This paper provides an overview of the field, explores key methodologies, discusses the challenges and threats, and outlines potential future directions for responsible development and deployment of Personality Computing technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T22:03:48Z) - Design Patterns for the Common Good: Building Better Technologies Using the Wisdom of Virtue Ethics [6.89544858276367]
We propose an approach for identifying user experience design patterns that embody particular virtues.<n>We documented seven design patterns for social media that uphold the virtues of Catholic Social Teaching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-17T16:31:40Z) - A semantic embedding space based on large language models for modelling human beliefs [6.558951808581431]
We study belief interplay by leveraging online user debate data and mapping beliefs onto a fine-tuned large language model (LLM)<n>This belief space captures the interconnectedness and polarization of diverse beliefs across social issues.<n>Our findings show positions within this belief space predict new beliefs how individuals estimate cognitive dissonance based on the distance between existing and new beliefs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-13T23:58:45Z) - Making Software Development More Diverse and Inclusive: Key Themes, Challenges, and Future Directions [50.545824691484796]
We identify six themes around the theme challenges and opportunities to improve Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion (SDDI)<n>We identify benefits, harms, and future research directions for the four main themes.<n>We discuss the remaining two themes, Artificial Intelligence & SDDI and AI & Computer Science education, which have a cross-cutting effect on the other themes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T16:18:11Z) - Religion and Spirituality on Social Media in the Aftermath of the Global
Pandemic [59.930429668324294]
We analyse the sudden change in religious activities twofold: we create and deliver a questionnaire, as well as analyse Twitter data.
Importantly, we also analyse the temporal variations in this process by analysing a period of 3 months: July-September 2020.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-11T18:41:02Z) - SLAM for Visually Impaired People: a Survey [18.839307761493174]
We present the first systematic literature review of 54 recent studies on SLAM-based solutions for blind and visually impaired people.
We discuss the advantages and limitations of these techniques for blind and visually impaired navigation.
Our analysis also evaluates the effectiveness of these SLAM-based solutions in real-world scenarios and user satisfaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-09T09:45:43Z) - Coordinated Science Laboratory 70th Anniversary Symposium: The Future of
Computing [80.72844751804166]
In 2021, the Coordinated Science Laboratory CSL hosted the Future of Computing Symposium to celebrate its 70th anniversary.
We summarize the major technological points, insights, and directions that speakers brought forward during the symposium.
Participants discussed topics related to new computing paradigms, technologies, algorithms, behaviors, and research challenges to be expected in the future.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-04T17:32:27Z) - The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [64.77385130665128]
The aim of this workshop is to foster the exchange of insights on past and ongoing research towards effective and long-lasting collaborations between humans and robots.
We particularly focus on AI techniques required to implement autonomous and proactive interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-07T11:12:45Z) - A Computational Inflection for Scientific Discovery [48.176406062568674]
We stand at the foot of a significant inflection in the trajectory of scientific discovery.
As society continues on its fast-paced digital transformation, so does humankind's collective scientific knowledge.
Computer science is poised to ignite a revolution in the scientific process itself.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-04T11:36:54Z) - Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of
Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past.
We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers.
These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z) - The Contestation of Tech Ethics: A Sociotechnical Approach to Ethics and
Technology in Action [3.42658286826597]
Ethics discourse has proliferated across the world of digital technologies.
Tech ethics is vague and toothless, subsumed into corporate logics and incentives.
I recast tech ethics as a terrain of contestation where the central fault line is not whether it is desirable to be ethical, but what "ethics" entails and who gets to define it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-03T12:16:08Z) - Axes for Sociotechnical Inquiry in AI Research [3.0215443986383734]
We propose four directions for inquiry into new and evolving areas of technological development.
The paper provides a lexicon for sociotechnical inquiry and illustrates it through the example of consumer drone technology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-26T16:49:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.