Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Computational Pathology: Definitions, Taxonomy, and Recommendations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28820v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 19:46:28 GMT
• Title: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Computational Pathology: Definitions, Taxonomy, and Recommendations
• Abstract summary: Computational pathology (CompPath) is transforming medicine by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to support diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment prediction from gigapixel whole-slide images.<n>Clinical adoption is progressing, but is constrained by concerns about safety, accountability, and regulatory oversight in high-stakes clinical environments.
• Score: 6.122990622242377
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Computational pathology (CompPath) is transforming medicine by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to support diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment prediction from gigapixel whole-slide images. Clinical adoption is progressing, but is constrained by concerns about safety, accountability, and regulatory oversight in high-stakes clinical environments. Explainable AI (XAI) systems hold promise for building trust and enabling verification, yet the literature remains fragmented due to inconsistent terminology, overlapping methodological families, ad hoc validation, and current reviews. This review aims to formalize XAI methods in CompPath through the: i) introduction of a pathology-centric vocabulary comprising seven core terms; ii) development of a taxonomy across methodological families and three orthogonal axes (stage, type, scope); and iii) establishment of a task-driven framework that maps five clinical questions to recommended methods, method evaluation, and deployment context. Five key gaps between current XAI capabilities and clinical deployment are identified, and actionable steps are proposed to advance XAI for CompPath.

Related papers

• Three Generations of Healthcare IT: From the Digital Record to the Computable Care Process [47.027290803102666]
  We describe a computational layer whose object is patient-specific clinical intent.<n>We formalize the Actionable Clinical Record as the atomic object of the third layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-09T16:44:28Z)
• Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions [95.59915390053588]
  This study focuses on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches-focusing on deep neural networks (DNNs) and large language models (LLMs)<n>We discuss critical symptoms that stem from deeper root causes (i.e., two paradoxes, two conceptual confusions, and five false assumptions)<n>To move beyond XAI's limitations, we propose a four-pronged paradigm shift toward reliable and certified AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T16:58:27Z)
• From Explainability to Action: A Generative Operational Framework for Integrating XAI in Clinical Mental Health Screening [0.3181700357675698]
  This paper argues that this gap is a translation problem and proposes the Generative Operational Framework.<n>This framework is designed to ingest the raw, technical outputs from diverse XAI tools and synthesize them with clinical guidelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T05:46:39Z)
• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• A Survey on Human-Centered Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods in Clinical Decision Support Systems [42.740755280486546]
  This paper provides a survey of human-centered evaluations of Explainable AI methods in Clinical Decision Support Systems.<n>Our findings reveal key challenges in the integration of XAI into healthcare and propose a structured framework to align the evaluation methods of XAI with the clinical needs of stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T01:21:29Z)
• Transparent AI: Developing an Explainable Interface for Predicting Postoperative Complications [1.6609516435725236]
  We propose an Explainable AI (XAI) framework designed to answer five critical questions. We incorporated various techniques such as Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) We showcased an XAI interface prototype that adheres to this framework for predicting major postoperative complications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T21:01:27Z)
• Enhancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Mammography: Evaluation and Integration of Convolutional Neural Networks and Explainable AI [0.0]
  The study presents an integrated framework combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for the enhanced diagnosis of breast cancer. The methodology encompasses an elaborate data preprocessing pipeline and advanced data augmentation techniques to counteract dataset limitations. A focal point of our study is the evaluation of XAI's effectiveness in interpreting model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T05:00:21Z)
• Designing Interpretable ML System to Enhance Trust in Healthcare: A Systematic Review to Proposed Responsible Clinician-AI-Collaboration Framework [13.215318138576713]
  The paper reviews interpretable AI processes, methods, applications, and the challenges of implementation in healthcare. It aims to foster a comprehensive understanding of the crucial role of a robust interpretability approach in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T12:29:18Z)
• Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
  "Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions. We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z)
• Evaluation of Popular XAI Applied to Clinical Prediction Models: Can They be Trusted? [2.0089256058364358]
  The absence of transparency and explainability hinders the clinical adoption of Machine learning (ML) algorithms. This study evaluates two popular XAI methods used for explaining predictive models in the healthcare context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T02:29:30Z)
• A Brief Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare [7.844015105790313]
  XAI refers to the techniques and methods for building AI applications. Model explainability and interpretability are vital successful deployment of AI models in healthcare practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T05:41:57Z)
• Learning Binary Semantic Embedding for Histology Image Classification and Retrieval [56.34863511025423]
  We propose a novel method for Learning Binary Semantic Embedding (LBSE) Based on the efficient and effective embedding, classification and retrieval are performed to provide interpretable computer-assisted diagnosis for histology images. Experiments conducted on three benchmark datasets validate the superiority of LBSE under various scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T08:36:44Z)
• Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Automatic Disease Diagnosis [52.111516253474285]
  We propose to integrate a hierarchical policy structure of two levels into the dialogue systemfor policy learning. The proposed policy structure is capable to deal with diagnosis problem including large number of diseases and symptoms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T15:02:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.