When Does Bigger Help? A Controlled Study of LLM Scale for Ontology Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31118v1
• Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:30:05 GMT
• Title: When Does Bigger Help? A Controlled Study of LLM Scale for Ontology Learning
• Abstract summary: We evaluate 13 models spanning dense and Mixture-of-Experts variants from the Qwen3.5 and Qwen3.6 lineages.<n>Dense 27B models outperform substantially sparse models on term typing, whereas larger Mixture-of-Experts models achieve the strongest open-weight results on taxonomy discovery.
• Score: 5.477826608330914
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The effect of Large Language Model (LLM) scale on ontology learning (OL) performance remains insufficiently characterized. We present a controlled evaluation of 13 models spanning dense and Mixture-of-Experts variants from the Qwen3.5 and Qwen3.6 lineages, together with proprietary GPT release variants, using the OntoLearner retrieval-augmented generation pipeline. All models are evaluated with the same embedding model, retrieval configuration, prompt templates, decoding settings, datasets, and metrics on term typing, taxonomy discovery, and non-taxonomic relationship extraction across four biomedical and materials science and engineering ontologies. Within the dense Qwen3.5 lineage, increasing parameter count primarily improves precision rather than recall, with the largest gains occurring between 9B and 27B parameters. However, the effect of scale is neither monotonic nor uniform across tasks and domains. Dense 27B models outperform substantially larger sparse models on term typing, whereas larger Mixture-of-Experts models achieve the strongest open-weight results on taxonomy discovery. Non-taxonomic relationship extraction remains difficult across model scales, particularly for the Materials Data Science ontology. Performance differences across matched Qwen variants and proprietary GPT releases further indicate that architecture and model lineage can outweigh nominal parameter count. These findings show that model size alone is an insufficient selection criterion for OL and provide empirical guidance for reproducible LLM-assisted ontology engineering.

Related papers

• Aggregate Models, Not Explanations: Improving Feature Importance Estimation [29.82699646128964]
  We show that ensembling at the model level provides more accurate variable-importance estimates.<n>We validate these findings on classical benchmarks and a large-scale proteomic study from the UK Biobank.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T09:36:03Z)
• Towards a Comprehensive Scaling Law of Mixture-of-Experts [54.117786590884776]
  We propose a comprehensive and precise joint MoE scaling law that considers all essential factors.<n>Our results demonstrate that the optimal settings for $G$ and $S$ are independent of both the model architecture and data size.<n>Our proposed MoE scaling law could function as an accurate and insightful guidance to facilitate future MoE model design and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T06:35:34Z)
• The Role of Model Architecture and Scale in Predicting Molecular Properties: Insights from Fine-Tuning RoBERTa, BART, and LLaMA [0.0]
  This study introduces a systematic framework to compare the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) for fine-tuning across various cheminformatics tasks. We assessed three well-known models-RoBERTa, BART, and LLaMA-on their ability to predict molecular properties. We found that LLaMA-based models generally offered the lowest validation loss, suggesting their superior adaptability across tasks and scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T02:20:12Z)
• A comparative study of zero-shot inference with large language models and supervised modeling in breast cancer pathology classification [1.4715634464004446]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising transfer learning capability. LLMs demonstrated the potential to speed up the execution of clinical NLP studies by reducing the need for curating large annotated datasets. This may result in an increase in the utilization of NLP-based variables and outcomes in observational clinical studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T02:05:31Z)
• The Languini Kitchen: Enabling Language Modelling Research at Different Scales of Compute [66.84421705029624]
  We introduce an experimental protocol that enables model comparisons based on equivalent compute, measured in accelerator hours. We pre-process an existing large, diverse, and high-quality dataset of books that surpasses existing academic benchmarks in quality, diversity, and document length. This work also provides two baseline models: a feed-forward model derived from the GPT-2 architecture and a recurrent model in the form of a novel LSTM with ten-fold throughput.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T10:31:17Z)
• The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease detection [51.697248252191265]
  This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation. We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare. Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z)
• On the Generalization and Adaption Performance of Causal Models [99.64022680811281]
  Differentiable causal discovery has proposed to factorize the data generating process into a set of modules. We study the generalization and adaption performance of such modular neural causal models. Our analysis shows that the modular neural causal models outperform other models on both zero and few-shot adaptation in low data regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T17:12:32Z)
• Dynamically-Scaled Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis [77.34726150561087]
  Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) is a method for feature extraction of two views by finding maximally correlated linear projections of them. We introduce a novel dynamic scaling method for training an input-dependent canonical correlation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-23T12:52:49Z)
• Bayesian Active Learning for Discrete Latent Variable Models [19.852463786440122]
  Active learning seeks to reduce the amount of data required to fit the parameters of a model. latent variable models play a vital role in neuroscience, psychology, and a variety of other engineering and scientific disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T19:07:12Z)
• Deep Learning Models for Knowledge Tracing: Review and Empirical Evaluation [2.423547527175807]
  We review and evaluate a body of deep learning knowledge tracing (DLKT) models with openly available and widely-used data sets. The evaluated DLKT models have been reimplemented for assessing and replicability of previously reported results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-30T14:19:27Z)
• Modeling Shared Responses in Neuroimaging Studies through MultiView ICA [94.31804763196116]
  Group studies involving large cohorts of subjects are important to draw general conclusions about brain functional organization. We propose a novel MultiView Independent Component Analysis model for group studies, where data from each subject are modeled as a linear combination of shared independent sources plus noise. We demonstrate the usefulness of our approach first on fMRI data, where our model demonstrates improved sensitivity in identifying common sources among subjects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T17:29:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.