A Dataset for Modeling Iterative Problem-Solving
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00940v1
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 09:00:55 GMT
- Title: A Dataset for Modeling Iterative Problem-Solving
- Abstract summary: We build a benchmark that evaluates models spanning parametric, sequential, and generative traditions.<n>We find that the model's coding proficiency is inversely related to predictive performance in this setting.
- Score: 26.98102675986399
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Solving problems through repeated attempts is a sequential modeling task: at each step, the solver receives feedback and decides how to revise their solutions. Predicting whether performance improves, plateaus, or regresses across attempts is central to understanding any iterative problem-solving process in both human learners and autonomous agents. Beyond outcomes, modeling what errors persist and how strategies shift across attempts provides deeper insight into the mechanics of sequential learning. Studying these dynamics requires observing many solvers as they attempt, receive feedback, and revise. Programming courses with automated grading provide this setting, as students iteratively submit code to test suites and receive feedback on every attempt. We therefore curate CodeInsight, a large-scale dataset of over 3 million submissions from 3,286 undergraduates across 2 introductory C++ courses in 2 academic years, with test-case-level outcomes, timestamps, and source code. On this dataset, we build a benchmark that evaluates models spanning parametric, sequential, and generative traditions under a shared calibration-and-scoring protocol, including a Recurrent State Space Model (RSSM) adapted to track solver characteristics through discrete latent variables and an LLM-based predictor that generates explicit solutions. The adapted RSSM achieves the strongest predictive accuracy on three of the four courses. The LLM predictor is less accurate but produces full submissions at each attempt, enabling direct analysis of failure modes. We find that the model's coding proficiency is inversely related to predictive performance in this setting, with the LLM better understood as a generative solver conditioned on context rather than a faithful predictor of solver behavior. We publicly release our code and the dataset on request to facilitate future research.
Related papers
- SciML Agents: Write the Solver, Not the Solution [69.5021018644143]
We introduce two new datasets: a diagnostic dataset of adversarial "misleading" problems; and a large-scale benchmark of 1,000 diverse ODE tasks.<n>We evaluate open- and closed-source LLM models along two axes: (i) unguided versus guided prompting with domain-specific knowledge; and (ii) off-the-shelf versus fine-tuned variants.<n>Preliminary results indicate that careful prompting and fine-tuning can yield a specialized LLM agent capable of reliably solving simple ODE problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-12T02:53:57Z) - Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting [70.83781268763215]
Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive performance across diverse multimodal tasks by leveraging large-scale pre-training.<n>VLMs face unique challenges such as cross-modal feature drift, parameter interference due to shared architectures, and zero-shot capability erosion.<n>This survey aims to serve as a comprehensive and diagnostic reference for researchers developing lifelong vision-language systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-06T09:03:10Z) - What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning? [83.83230167222852]
We find that a model's generalization behavior can be effectively characterized by a training metric we call pre-memorization train accuracy.
By connecting a model's learning behavior to its generalization, pre-memorization train accuracy can guide targeted improvements to training strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-12T09:52:40Z) - Recursive Introspection: Teaching Language Model Agents How to Self-Improve [30.086494067593268]
We develop RISE: Recursive IntroSpEction, an approach for fine-tuning large language models.
Our experiments show that RISE enables Llama2, Llama3, and Mistral models to improve themselves with more turns on math reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-25T17:35:59Z) - Online Analytic Exemplar-Free Continual Learning with Large Models for Imbalanced Autonomous Driving Task [25.38082751323396]
We propose an Analytic Exemplar-Free Online Continual Learning algorithm (AEF-OCL)
The AEF-OCL leverages analytic continual learning principles and employs ridge regression as a classifier for features extracted by a large backbone network.
Experimental results demonstrate that despite being an exemplar-free strategy, our method outperforms various methods on the autonomous driving SODA10M dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T03:19:15Z) - Winning solutions and post-challenge analyses of the ChaLearn AutoDL
challenge 2019 [112.36155380260655]
This paper reports the results and post-challenge analyses of ChaLearn's AutoDL challenge series.
Results show that DL methods dominated, though popular Neural Architecture Search (NAS) was impractical.
A high level modular organization emerged featuring a "meta-learner", "data ingestor", "model selector", "model/learner", and "evaluator"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-11T06:21:18Z) - Memory-Based Optimization Methods for Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning and
Personalized Federated Learning [56.17603785248675]
Model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) has become a popular research area.
Existing MAML algorithms rely on the episode' idea by sampling a few tasks and data points to update the meta-model at each iteration.
This paper proposes memory-based algorithms for MAML that converge with vanishing error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-09T08:47:58Z) - Meta-Learned Confidence for Few-shot Learning [60.6086305523402]
A popular transductive inference technique for few-shot metric-based approaches, is to update the prototype of each class with the mean of the most confident query examples.
We propose to meta-learn the confidence for each query sample, to assign optimal weights to unlabeled queries.
We validate our few-shot learning model with meta-learned confidence on four benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T10:22:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.