Frontier LLMs are effective batch optimizers: Assessing reasoning models in continuous and discrete settings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03177v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 21:39:07 GMT
• Title: Frontier LLMs are effective batch optimizers: Assessing reasoning models in continuous and discrete settings
• Abstract summary: Frontier large language models (LLMs) have become attractive priors for optimization due to their large-scale pretraining.<n>We investigate the performance of the current generation of frontier LLMs as batch priors in both continuous and discrete settings.<n>LLMs are significantly better in semantically rich settings, indicating that their batch optimization behavior is highly effective when navigating and reasoning over the discrete spaces.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Frontier large language models (LLMs) have become attractive priors for optimization due to their large-scale pretraining that enables them to navigate a variety of optimization settings. However, the effectiveness of modern reasoning LLMs in batch optimization settings remains underexplored. Here we investigate the performance of the current generation of frontier LLMs as batch optimizers in both continuous and discrete settings. We find that while LLMs are competitive zero-shot batch optimizers for numerical test functions, their performance is brittle compared to classical non-LLM optimization approaches. However, LLM priors are significantly better in semantically rich settings, indicating that their batch optimization behavior is highly effective when navigating and reasoning over the discrete spaces most similar in structure to their pretraining data.

Related papers

• The Chicken and Egg Dilemma: Co-optimizing Data and Model Configurations for LLMs [86.27977008139435]
  JoBS is an approach that uses a scaling-law-inspired performance predictor to aid Bayesian optimization.<n>We study JoBS's average regret and devise the optimal budget allocation to minimize regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T07:33:40Z)
• A Meta-Knowledge-Augmented LLM Framework for Hyperparameter Optimization in Time-Series Forecasting [0.0]
  We introduce LLM-AutoOpt, a hybrid HPO framework that combines BO with LLM-based contextual reasoning.<n>We show that LLM-AutoOpt achieves improved predictive performance and more interpretable optimization behavior compared to BO and LLM baselines without meta-knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T21:26:57Z)
• GPTOpt: Towards Efficient LLM-Based Black-Box Optimization [33.09351655863645]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown broad capabilities, yet state-of-the-art models remain limited in solving continuous black-box optimization tasks.<n>We introduce GPTOpt, an LLM-based optimization method that equips LLMs with continuous black-box optimization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T11:21:55Z)
• Mitigating Hallucination Through Theory-Consistent Symmetric Multimodal Preference Optimization [69.05600758833471]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as an effective approach for mitigating hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>We propose a Symmetric Multimodal Preference Optimization (SymMPO) which conducts symmetric preference learning with direct preference supervision (i.e., response pairs)<n>In addition to conventional ordinal preference learning, SymMPO introduces a preference margin consistency loss to quantitatively regulate the preference gap between symmetric preference pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T12:29:15Z)
• Divide, Optimize, Merge: Fine-Grained LLM Agent Optimization at Scale [19.60416591361918]
  Fine-Grained Optimization (FGO) is a scalable framework that divides large optimization tasks into manageable subsets, performs targeted optimizations, and systematically combines optimized components through progressive merging.<n> evaluation across ALFWorld, LogisticsQA, and GAIA benchmarks demonstrate that FGO outperforms existing approaches by 1.6-8.6% while reducing average prompt token consumption by 56.3%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T20:50:27Z)
• Breaking the Frozen Subspace: Importance Sampling for Low-Rank Optimization in LLM Pretraining [43.39070237124361]
  Low-rank optimization is a promising approach to enabling memory-efficient training of large language models.<n>A key challenge in these methods is selecting suitable subspaces to ensure an effective trajectory.<n>We propose importance sampling for low-rank optimization in LLM pretraining with a provable convergence guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T06:30:19Z)
• Align-Pro: A Principled Approach to Prompt Optimization for LLM Alignment [40.71270945505082]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into various societal and decision-making processes.<n>Traditional methods, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), achieve alignment by fine-tuning model parameters.<n>In contrast, prompt optimization is a viable alternative to RLHF for LLM alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T03:14:39Z)
• Discovering Preference Optimization Algorithms with and for Large Language Models [50.843710797024805]
  offline preference optimization is a key method for enhancing and controlling the quality of Large Language Model (LLM) outputs. We perform objective discovery to automatically discover new state-of-the-art preference optimization algorithms without (expert) human intervention. Experiments demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of DiscoPOP, a novel algorithm that adaptively blends logistic and exponential losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T16:58:41Z)
• LLM as a Complementary Optimizer to Gradient Descent: A Case Study in Prompt Tuning [69.95292905263393]
  We show that gradient-based and high-level LLMs can effectively collaborate a combined optimization framework.<n>In this paper, we show that these complementary to each other and can effectively collaborate a combined optimization framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T06:24:14Z)
• Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [56.84730239046117]
  We introduce a novel closed-form formulation for direct preference optimization using multiple reference models. The resulting algorithm, Multi-Reference Preference Optimization (MRPO), leverages broader prior knowledge from diverse reference models. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs finetuned with MRPO generalize better in various preference data, regardless of data scarcity or abundance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T00:29:04Z)
• Are Large Language Models Good Prompt Optimizers? [65.48910201816223]
  We conduct a study to uncover the actual mechanism of LLM-based Prompt Optimization. Our findings reveal that the LLMs struggle to identify the true causes of errors during reflection, tending to be biased by their own prior knowledge. We introduce a new "Automatic Behavior Optimization" paradigm, which directly optimize the target model's behavior in a more controllable manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T09:48:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.