Improving Clinical Target Volume Segmentation Accuracy using Anatomical Priors and Active Learning for the AGITG TOPGEAR Clinical Trial

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03186v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 22:03:11 GMT
• Title: Improving Clinical Target Volume Segmentation Accuracy using Anatomical Priors and Active Learning for the AGITG TOPGEAR Clinical Trial
• Abstract summary: Training deep learning-based medical image segmentation models is challenging with limited curated datasets.<n>For AGITG TOPGEAR, a gastric cancer trial, the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) is complex and defined by multiple anatomical landmarks.<n>We investigate anatomical priors, derived from surrounding organ segmentations, to provide spatial context and improve CTV segmentation accuracy.
• Score: 2.144682176982614
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Training deep learning-based medical image segmentation models is challenging with limited curated datasets. For AGITG TOPGEAR, a gastric cancer trial, the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) is complex and defined by multiple anatomical landmarks, making upfront training data preparation difficult for an automated contour QA segmentation model. We investigate anatomical priors, derived from surrounding organ segmentations, to provide spatial context and improve TOPGEAR CTV segmentation accuracy. We also evaluate active learning, iteratively expanding the training dataset by selecting cases expected to improve performance. One hundred TOPGEAR CT scans were retrospectively analyzed. An initial set of 10 expert-contoured cases was used to train an nnU-Net model. TotalSegmentator generated a voxel-wise anatomical prior map from surrounding structures as an additional input channel. Active learning was simulated over four iterations, selecting cases by model uncertainty and segmentation performance. All models used five-fold cross-validation for an ensemble uncertainty measure. Evaluation used a hold-out testing set of 50 cases. The anatomical prior improved CTV segmentation accuracy, increasing mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) from 0.84 to 0.86. Active learning similarly improved performance to 0.86, with greatest benefit in the final round. Combining the anatomical prior with active learning achieved the highest accuracy, with a DSC of 0.87. Model uncertainty correlated with DSC, supporting its use in identifying suboptimal predictions and guiding active learning. Anatomical priors and active learning each improved CTV segmentation accuracy and generalizability, with their combination achieving the best performance, supporting integration into segmentation model development for automated contour QA in radiotherapy clinical trials.

Related papers

• Automated Prostate Gland Segmentation in MRI Using nnU-Net [0.14777718769290524]
  We propose a dedicated deep learning-based approach for automatic prostate gland segmentation using the nnUNet v2 framework.<n>The proposed model achieved a mean Dice score of 0.96 +/- 0.00 in cross-validation and 0.82 on the external test set, demonstrating strong generalization despite domain shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T12:28:03Z)
• Cerebra: A Multidisciplinary AI Board for Multimodal Dementia Characterization and Risk Assessment [56.62016795093786]
  Cerebra is an interactive multi-agent AI team that coordinates specialized agents for EHR, clinical notes, and medical imaging analysis.<n>It supports privacy-preserving deployment by operating on structured representations and remains robust when modalities are incomplete.<n>Cerebra significantly improved expert performance, increasing accuracy by 17.5 percentage points in prospective dementia risk estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T05:46:45Z)
• Longitudinal Vestibular Schwannoma Dataset with Consensus-based Human-in-the-loop Annotations [3.1898695141875772]
  This dataset includes 190 patients, with tumour annotations available for 534 longitudinal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1CE) scans from 184 patients, and non-annotated T2-weighted scans from 6 patients.<n>We show that our approach enables effective and resource-efficient generalisation of automated segmentation models to a target data distribution.<n>It is estimated to enhance efficiency by approximately 37.4% compared to the conventional manual annotation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T09:53:28Z)
• A Disease-Centric Vision-Language Foundation Model for Precision Oncology in Kidney Cancer [54.58205672910646]
  RenalCLIP is a visual-language foundation model for characterization, diagnosis and prognosis of renal mass.<n>It achieved better performance and superior generalizability across 10 core tasks spanning the full clinical workflow of kidney cancer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T17:48:19Z)
• CADS: A Comprehensive Anatomical Dataset and Segmentation for Whole-Body Anatomy in Computed Tomography [27.1055374364626]
  We present CADS, an open-source framework that prioritizes the systematic integration, standardization, and labeling of heterogeneous data sources for whole-body CT segmentation.<n>At its core is a large-scale dataset of 22,022 CT volumes with complete annotations for 167 anatomical structures.<n>Through comprehensive evaluation across 18 public datasets and an independent real-world hospital cohort, we demonstrate advantages over SoTA approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T19:58:32Z)
• A Continual Learning-driven Model for Accurate and Generalizable Segmentation of Clinically Comprehensive and Fine-grained Whole-body Anatomies in CT [67.34586036959793]
  There is no fully annotated CT dataset with all anatomies delineated for training.<n>We propose a novel continual learning-driven CT model that can segment complete anatomies.<n>Our single unified CT segmentation model, CL-Net, can highly accurately segment a clinically comprehensive set of 235 fine-grained whole-body anatomies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T23:55:02Z)
• Towards Unifying Anatomy Segmentation: Automated Generation of a Full-body CT Dataset via Knowledge Aggregation and Anatomical Guidelines [113.08940153125616]
  We generate a dataset of whole-body CT scans with $142$ voxel-level labels for 533 volumes providing comprehensive anatomical coverage. Our proposed procedure does not rely on manual annotation during the label aggregation stage. We release our trained unified anatomical segmentation model capable of predicting $142$ anatomical structures on CT data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T09:48:13Z)
• Ensemble uncertainty as a criterion for dataset expansion in distinct bone segmentation from upper-body CT images [0.7388859384645263]
  The localisation and segmentation of individual bones is an important preprocessing step in many planning and navigation applications. We present an end-to-end learnt algorithm that is capable of segmenting 125 distinct bones in an upper-body CT. We also provide an ensemble-based uncertainty measure that helps to single out scans to enlarge the training dataset with.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-19T08:39:23Z)
• TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT images [48.50994220135258]
  We present a deep learning segmentation model for body CT images. The model can segment 104 anatomical structures relevant for use cases such as organ volumetry, disease characterization, and surgical or radiotherapy planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T15:16:40Z)
• Improving Classification Model Performance on Chest X-Rays through Lung Segmentation [63.45024974079371]
  We propose a deep learning approach to enhance abnormal chest x-ray (CXR) identification performance through segmentations. Our approach is designed in a cascaded manner and incorporates two modules: a deep neural network with criss-cross attention modules (XLSor) for localizing lung region in CXR images and a CXR classification model with a backbone of a self-supervised momentum contrast (MoCo) model pre-trained on large-scale CXR data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T15:24:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.