Understanding Autonomous Driving Datasets by Describing Differences between Image Subsets in Natural Language

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03677v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 11:15:23 GMT
• Title: Understanding Autonomous Driving Datasets by Describing Differences between Image Subsets in Natural Language
• Abstract summary: This paper studies set difference captioning: given two subsets of images, the goal is to produce a natural-language hypothesis describing differences between the target and reference set.<n>We adapt the method to autonomous driving by focusing on object-centric patches derived from object detection.<n>Low-concentration experiments assess the suitability of set-difference-captioning approaches to sparse, real-world differences.
• Score: 4.923151020110198
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Understanding the composition of large-scale autonomous driving datasets is essential for safety, robustness, and reliable operation across domains. For example, domain shift between locations could lead to the operating environment being misaligned with the training data, resulting in potentially dangerous performance degradation. Yet, existing data analysis pipelines largely rely on metadata, predefined labels, or manual inspection, which provide limited semantic insight or do not scale. This paper studies set difference captioning: given two subsets of images, the goal is to produce a natural-language hypothesis describing differences between the target and reference set. Building on a two-stage formulation, we adapt the method to autonomous driving by focusing on object-centric patches derived from object detection, which simplifies aggregation and enables attribution of differences to specific object instances or categories. To evaluate this setting in-domain, we introduce a new benchmark, AD-Diff Bench. Low-concentration experiments assess the suitability of set-difference-captioning approaches to sparse, real-world differences. We restrict our experiments to open-weight models to support reproducibility and ease of deployment. The proposed benchmark and analysis provide a step towards practical, human-interpretable dataset introspection for autonomous driving datasets. Our implementation and benchmark dataset are available at https://github.com/KIT-MRT/AD-Diff

Related papers

• Instance-Guided Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Robotic Semantic Segmentation [4.556831252263135]
  Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) adapts the network to the robot's target environment without external supervision.<n>We propose a method that starts from a 3D map to generate multi-view consistent pseudo-labels.<n>We refine these labels using the zero-shot instance segmentation capabilities of a foundation model, enforcing instance-level coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T18:49:03Z)
• LLM-Augmented Changepoint Detection: A Framework for Ensemble Detection and Automated Explanation [2.6022681036325874]
  This paper introduces a novel changepoint detection framework that combines ensemble statistical methods with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The proposed ensemble method aggregates results from ten distinct changepoint detection algorithms, achieving superior performance and robustness compared to individual methods.<n>For private or domain-specific data, a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) solution enables explanations grounded in user-provided documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T12:04:38Z)
• Unified modality separation: A vision-language framework for unsupervised domain adaptation [60.8391821117794]
  Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) enables models trained on a labeled source domain to handle new unlabeled domains.<n>We propose a unified modality separation framework that accommodates both modality-specific and modality-invariant components.<n>Our methods achieve up to 9% performance gain with 9 times of computational efficiencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T02:51:10Z)
• Downstream-Pretext Domain Knowledge Traceback for Active Learning [138.02530777915362]
  We propose a downstream-pretext domain knowledge traceback (DOKT) method that traces the data interactions of downstream knowledge and pre-training guidance. DOKT consists of a traceback diversity indicator and a domain-based uncertainty estimator. Experiments conducted on ten datasets show that our model outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T01:34:13Z)
• Explaining Cross-Domain Recognition with Interpretable Deep Classifier [100.63114424262234]
  Interpretable Deep (IDC) learns the nearest source samples of a target sample as evidence upon which the classifier makes the decision. Our IDC leads to a more explainable model with almost no accuracy degradation and effectively calibrates classification for optimum reject options.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T15:58:56Z)
• Self-supervised Pre-training for Semantic Segmentation in an Indoor Scene [8.357801312689622]
  We propose RegConsist, a method for self-supervised pre-training of a semantic segmentation model. We use a variant of contrastive learning to train a DCNN model for predicting semantic segmentation from RGB views in the target environment. The proposed method outperforms models pre-trained on ImageNet and achieves competitive performance when using models that are trained for exactly the same task but on a different dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T20:10:14Z)
• Detection Hub: Unifying Object Detection Datasets via Query Adaptation on Language Embedding [137.3719377780593]
  A new design (named Detection Hub) is dataset-aware and category-aligned. It mitigates the dataset inconsistency and provides coherent guidance for the detector to learn across multiple datasets. The categories across datasets are semantically aligned into a unified space by replacing one-hot category representations with word embedding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T17:59:44Z)
• Low-confidence Samples Matter for Domain Adaptation [47.552605279925736]
  Domain adaptation (DA) aims to transfer knowledge from a label-rich source domain to a related but label-scarce target domain. We propose a novel contrastive learning method by processing low-confidence samples. We evaluate the proposed method in both unsupervised and semi-supervised DA settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-06T15:45:45Z)
• Attentive Prototypes for Source-free Unsupervised Domain Adaptive 3D Object Detection [85.11649974840758]
  3D object detection networks tend to be biased towards the data they are trained on. We propose a single-frame approach for source-free, unsupervised domain adaptation of lidar-based 3D object detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T18:42:42Z)
• Seeking Similarities over Differences: Similarity-based Domain Alignment for Adaptive Object Detection [86.98573522894961]
  We propose a framework that generalizes the components commonly used by Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) algorithms for detection. Specifically, we propose a novel UDA algorithm, ViSGA, that leverages the best design choices and introduces a simple but effective method to aggregate features at instance-level. We show that both similarity-based grouping and adversarial training allows our model to focus on coarsely aligning feature groups, without being forced to match all instances across loosely aligned domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T13:09:56Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.