Evaluating Large Language Models for Forced Outage Risk Prediction: Benefits and Comparison to Machine Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04272v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 19:38:37 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Large Language Models for Forced Outage Risk Prediction: Benefits and Comparison to Machine Learning
• Abstract summary: This study examines the ability of large language models to predict the risk of weather-related forced outages in the distribution grid.<n>The problem is formulated as a binary severity classification task using six years of outage records and high-resolution weather data.
• Score: 0.16112718683989877
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This study examines the ability of large language models (LLMs) to predict the risk of weather-related forced outages in the distribution grid in a zero-shot framework, without labeled training data. The problem is formulated as a binary severity classification task across three forecast horizons (3h, 6h, 12h), using six years of outage records and high-resolution weather data for a utility service area in central Texas. Four zero-shot LLMs are benchmarked against two supervised classifiers across two input configurations: one using current weather observations and the other using weather forecast data. Results show that supervised models outperform LLMs on macro-F1 and precision, while newer LLM generations achieve competitive scores. Beyond accuracy, LLMs offer complementary strengths in actionable reasoning and geographic scalability, suggesting that combining them with supervised models may be the best practice.

Related papers

• Bidirectional Multimodal Fusion of Sky Images and Time-Series for Solar Forecasting with Large Language Models [5.367829077016888]
  Short-term photovoltaic (PV) power and global horizontal irradiance (GHI) forecasts are essential for effective dispatch, reserve scheduling, and grid operations.<n>We propose SolCloudLLM, an LLM-based multimodal forecasting framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T06:26:02Z)
• LLM-based Agents for Forecasting and Prediction: Methods, Training, Evaluation, and Applications [76.41731220830714]
  Large language models (LLMs) now support forecasting systems that combine language-based reasoning with temporal data, evidence retrieval, external tools, and iterative prediction.<n>We examine applications in finance, weather, health, energy, and operations, and we summarize the benchmarks and datasets used for evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-24T10:02:39Z)
• Distribution-Aware Diffusion-LLM for Robust Ultra-Long-Term Time Series Forecasting [8.2867621159451]
  Time series forecasting is a fundamental machine learning task.<n>Recent work has explored Large Language Models (LLMs) for this purpose due to their strong generalization, pattern recognition, and zero-shot or few-shot capabilities.<n>We propose a new framework Diffusion-LLM that integrates a conditional diffusion model into an LLM-based forecasting pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T14:18:28Z)
• LEAF: A Living Benchmark for Event-Augmented Forecasting [78.94019460534442]
  LEAF is the first living benchmark for event-augmented forecasting tasks.<n>We evaluate state-of-the-art proprietary and open-weight LLMs.<n>We find that LLMs achieve better performance on equities they confidently identify as more predictable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T03:17:59Z)
• The Forecast Critic: Leveraging Large Language Models for Poor Forecast Identification [74.64864354503204]
  We propose The Forecast Critic, a system that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated forecast monitoring.<n>We evaluate the ability of LLMs to assess time series forecast quality.<n>We present three experiments, including on both synthetic and real-world forecasting data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T21:59:53Z)
• Can LLM Annotations Replace User Clicks for Learning to Rank? [112.2254432364736]
  Large-scale supervised data is essential for training modern ranking models, but obtaining high-quality human annotations is costly.<n>Click data has been widely used as a low-cost alternative, and with recent advances in large language models (LLMs), LLM-based relevance annotation has emerged as another promising annotation.<n> Experiments on both a public dataset, TianGong-ST, and an industrial dataset, Baidu-Click, show that click-supervised models perform better on high-frequency queries.<n>We explore two training strategies -- data scheduling and frequency-aware multi-objective learning -- that integrate both supervision signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T02:26:14Z)
• SPaRFT: Self-Paced Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models [51.74498855100541]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities when fine-tuned with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose textbfSPaRFT, a self-paced learning framework that enables efficient learning based on the capability of the model being trained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T03:50:48Z)
• Small but Mighty: Enhancing Time Series Forecasting with Lightweight LLMs [11.1036247482657]
  We present SMETimes, the first systematic investigation of sub-3B parameter SLMs for efficient and accurate time series forecasting.<n>Our approach centers on three key innovations: A statistically-enhanced prompting mechanism that bridges numerical time series with textual semantics through statistical features; A adaptive fusion embedding architecture that aligns temporal patterns with language model token spaces through learnable parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T15:27:36Z)
• Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judge [69.96778498636071]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) as judges and LLM-based data synthesis have emerged as two fundamental LLM-driven data annotation methods.<n>In this work, we expose preference leakage, a contamination problem in LLM-as-a-judge caused by the relatedness between the synthetic data generators and LLM-based evaluators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T17:13:03Z)
• Large Language Models are Few-shot Multivariate Time Series Classifiers [23.045734479292356]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively applied in time series analysis.<n>Yet, their utility in the few-shot classification (i.e., a crucial training scenario) is underexplored.<n>We aim to leverage the extensive pre-trained knowledge in LLMs to overcome the data scarcity problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T03:59:59Z)
• CALF: Aligning LLMs for Time Series Forecasting via Cross-modal Fine-Tuning [59.88924847995279]
  We propose a novel Cross-Modal LLM Fine-Tuning (CALF) framework for MTSF.<n>To reduce the distribution discrepancy, we develop the cross-modal match module.<n>CALF establishes state-of-the-art performance for both long-term and short-term forecasting tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T04:04:38Z)
• LLM4TS: Aligning Pre-Trained LLMs as Data-Efficient Time-Series Forecasters [11.796765525301051]
  We propose a framework for time-series forecasting with pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>LLM4TS consists of a two-stage fine-tuning strategy to align LLMs with the nuances of time-series data, and the forecasting fine-tuning stage for downstream time-series forecasting tasks.<n>Our framework features a novel two-level aggregation method that integrates multi-scale temporal data within pre-trained LLMs, enhancing their ability to interpret time-specific information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T16:19:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.