A Systematic Analysis of Automatic Differentiation versus Discretization-based Constraints for Physics-Informed PDE Solvers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07437v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:44:35 GMT
• Title: A Systematic Analysis of Automatic Differentiation versus Discretization-based Constraints for Physics-Informed PDE Solvers
• Abstract summary: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent a growing frontier using artificial intelligence to solve partial differential equations (PDEs)<n>We conduct systematic experiments across a wide spectrum of problems, from simple linear Poisson to high-Mach hypersonic flows with strong discontinuities.<n>Our results reveal a consistent trend: as nonlinearity strengthens, the accuracy advantage of discretization-based constraints becomes increasingly pronounced.
• Score: 5.821193246951147
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent a growing frontier in using artificial intelligence to solve partial differential equations (PDEs). Automatic differentiation (AD) plays a central role in this paradigm, which is mesh-free and replaces traditional iterative solvers with gradient-based optimization in continuous space. However, the inherent limitations of AD, particularly in handling higher-order derivatives and discontinuous solutions, pose significant challenges for complex problems. This has motivated a growing number of researchers to explore discretization-based constraints as an alternative path. Yet, the respective applicability of these two paradigms remains largely unexplored. In this work, we conduct systematic experiments across a wide spectrum of problems, from simple linear Poisson to high-Mach hypersonic flows with strong discontinuities. Through a rigorous decomposition of approximation, optimization, and truncation errors, we systematically elucidate the fundamental trade-offs and error-governing mechanisms of both paradigms, as well as two representative network architectures: multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and graph neural network (GNN). Our results reveal a consistent trend: as nonlinearity strengthens, the accuracy advantage of discretization-based constraints becomes increasingly pronounced, with smaller optimization errors compensating for the truncation errors. Moreover, the more complex the nonlinearity and boundary conditions, the greater the advantage of GNN over MLP. These insights offer a robust practical guideline for configuring neural PDE solvers in demanding engineering applications. Our source data and code are available at https://github.com/guoxing0809/neuropde_analysis.

Related papers

• Adjoint Method versus Physics-Informed Neural Networks in PDE-Constrained Inverse Problems [48.470700002941136]
  Inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) are central to computational mechanics and are commonly solved by adjoint-based optimization.<n> physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a flexible alternative.<n>We present a fair comparison of adjoint optimization and PINNs for PDE-constrained inverse problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T17:07:09Z)
• BEACONS: Bounded-Error, Algebraically-Composable Neural Solvers for Partial Differential Equations [0.0]
  We show how it is possible to circumvent limitations by constructing formally-verified neural network solvers for PDEs.<n>We show how it is possible to construct rigorous extrapolatory bounds on the worst-case Linf errors of shallow neural network approximations.<n>The resulting framework, called BEACONS, comprises both an automatic code-proving for the neural solvers themselves, as well as a bespoke automated theorem-generator system for producing machine-checkable certificates of correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T15:49:19Z)
• High precision PINNs in unbounded domains: application to singularity formulation in PDEs [83.50980325611066]
  We study the choices of neural network ansatz, sampling strategy, and optimization algorithm.<n>For 1D Burgers equation, our framework can lead to a solution with very high precision.<n>For the 2D Boussinesq equation, we obtain a solution whose loss is $4$ digits smaller than that obtained in citewang2023asymptotic with fewer training steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T02:01:44Z)
• Time Marching Neural Operator FE Coupling: AI Accelerated Physics Modeling [3.0635300721402228]
  This work introduces a novel hybrid framework that integrates physics-informed deep operator network with FEM through domain decomposition.<n>To address the challenges of dynamic systems, we embed a time stepping scheme directly into the DeepONet, substantially reducing long-term error propagation.<n>Our framework shows accelerated convergence rates (up to 20% improvement in convergence rates compared to conventional FE coupling approaches) while preserving solution fidelity with error margins consistently below 3%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T16:54:04Z)
• General-Kindred Physics-Informed Neural Network to the Solutions of Singularly Perturbed Differential Equations [11.121415128908566]
  We propose the General-Kindred Physics-Informed Neural Network (GKPINN) for solving Singular Perturbation Differential Equations (SPDEs) This approach utilizes prior knowledge of the boundary layer from the equation and establishes a novel network to assist PINN in approxing the boundary layer. The research findings underscore the exceptional performance of our novel approach, GKPINN, which delivers a remarkable enhancement in reducing the $L$ error by two to four orders of magnitude compared to the established PINN methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T02:03:22Z)
• A Stable and Scalable Method for Solving Initial Value PDEs with Neural Networks [52.5899851000193]
  We develop an ODE based IVP solver which prevents the network from getting ill-conditioned and runs in time linear in the number of parameters. We show that current methods based on this approach suffer from two key issues. First, following the ODE produces an uncontrolled growth in the conditioning of the problem, ultimately leading to unacceptably large numerical errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T17:28:18Z)
• Implicit Stochastic Gradient Descent for Training Physics-informed Neural Networks [51.92362217307946]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have effectively been demonstrated in solving forward and inverse differential equation problems. PINNs are trapped in training failures when the target functions to be approximated exhibit high-frequency or multi-scale features. In this paper, we propose to employ implicit gradient descent (ISGD) method to train PINNs for improving the stability of training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T08:17:47Z)
• Learning differentiable solvers for systems with hard constraints [48.54197776363251]
  We introduce a practical method to enforce partial differential equation (PDE) constraints for functions defined by neural networks (NNs) We develop a differentiable PDE-constrained layer that can be incorporated into any NN architecture. Our results show that incorporating hard constraints directly into the NN architecture achieves much lower test error when compared to training on an unconstrained objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T15:11:43Z)
• LordNet: An Efficient Neural Network for Learning to Solve Parametric Partial Differential Equations without Simulated Data [47.49194807524502]
  We propose LordNet, a tunable and efficient neural network for modeling entanglements. The experiments on solving Poisson's equation and (2D and 3D) Navier-Stokes equation demonstrate that the long-range entanglements can be well modeled by the LordNet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-19T14:41:08Z)
• Mitigating Learning Complexity in Physics and Equality Constrained Artificial Neural Networks [0.9137554315375919]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been proposed to learn the solution of partial differential equations (PDE) In PINNs, the residual form of the PDE of interest and its boundary conditions are lumped into a composite objective function as soft penalties. Here, we show that this specific way of formulating the objective function is the source of severe limitations in the PINN approach when applied to different kinds of PDEs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-19T04:12:01Z)
• Learning Physics-Informed Neural Networks without Stacked Back-propagation [82.26566759276105]
  We develop a novel approach that can significantly accelerate the training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks. In particular, we parameterize the PDE solution by the Gaussian smoothed model and show that, derived from Stein's Identity, the second-order derivatives can be efficiently calculated without back-propagation. Experimental results show that our proposed method can achieve competitive error compared to standard PINN training but is two orders of magnitude faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T18:07:54Z)
• Physics and Equality Constrained Artificial Neural Networks: Application to Partial Differential Equations [1.370633147306388]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been proposed to learn the solution of partial differential equations (PDE) Here, we show that this specific way of formulating the objective function is the source of severe limitations in the PINN approach. We propose a versatile framework that can tackle both inverse and forward problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-30T05:55:35Z)
• NTopo: Mesh-free Topology Optimization using Implicit Neural Representations [35.07884509198916]
  We present a novel machine learning approach to tackle topology optimization problems. We use multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) to parameterize both density and displacement fields. As we show through our experiments, a major benefit of our approach is that it enables self-supervised learning of continuous solution spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T05:25:22Z)
• Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations [57.90284928158383]
  One of the main challenges in using deep learning-based methods for simulating physical systems is formulating physics-based data. We propose a novel multi-level graph neural network framework that captures interaction at all ranges with only linear complexity. Experiments confirm our multi-graph network learns discretization-invariant solution operators to PDEs and can be evaluated in linear time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T21:56:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.