Socio-technical and Ethical Dimensions of Architecture Practices in FLOSS

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09975v1
• Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 10:03:09 GMT
• Title: Socio-technical and Ethical Dimensions of Architecture Practices in FLOSS
• Abstract summary: This project investigates how software architecture practices in Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) are shaped by socio-technical and ethical factors.<n>Motivated by FLOSS's role in digital sovereignty, it is observed that architectural decisions are often undocumented and scattered across issues, pull requests, and mailing lists.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This project investigates how software architecture practices in Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) are shaped by socio-technical and ethical factors, and how education can support more explicit, inclusive, and reflective architectural work. Motivated by FLOSS's role in digital sovereignty, it is observed that architectural decisions are often undocumented and scattered across issues, pull requests, and mailing lists. While prior research has studied architectural artifacts, erosion, and communication, the interplay between architectural work, governance arrangements, and ethical commitments in FLOSS remains underexplored. The research follows a three-phase design: (1) multi-method case studies of 3-4 domain-pairs of architecturally non-trivial FLOSS projects, (2) framework and intervention design with practitioners and educators, and (3) pilot evaluations in projects and courses. It will produce (i) cross-case empirical evidence on FLOSS architecture practices, (ii) a conceptual framework linking architecture practices to socio-technical conditions and ethical dimensions, and (iii) lightweight practices and teaching formats that render architectural work more explicit and inclusive.

Related papers

• A Two-Dimensional Framework for AI Agent Design Patterns: Cognitive Function and Execution Topology [54.72352855252792]
  We propose a two-dimensional classification that combines a Cognitive Function axis with seven categories and an Execution Topology axis with six structural archetypes.<n>The resulting 7x6 matrix identifies 27 named patterns, 13 with original names and provides a principled, framework-neutral, and model-agnostic vocabulary for AI agent architecture design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T04:01:01Z)
• ATRAF-driven IMRaD Methodology: Tradeoff and Risk Analysis of Software Architectures Across Abstraction Levels [0.0]
  evaluating architectural artifacts is essential to assess tradeoffs and risks affecting quality attributes such as performance, modifiability, and security.<n>Our prior work introduced the Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Framework (ATRAF)<n>This paper presents the ATRAF-driven IMRaD methodology, a concise method to align ATRAF's phases with IMRaD sections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T15:22:28Z)
• The Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Framework (ATRAF): A Unified Approach for Evaluating Software Architectures, Reference Architectures, and Architectural Frameworks [0.0]
  We introduce the Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Framework (ATRAF)<n>ATRAF is a scenario-driven framework for evaluating tradeoffs and risks across architectural levels.<n>It enables the identification of sensitivities, tradeoffs, and risks while supporting continuous refinement of architectural artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T17:48:52Z)
• TwinArch: A Digital Twin Reference Architecture [83.71071897785683]
  Digital Twins (DTs) are dynamic virtual representations of physical systems, enabled by seamless, bidirectional communication between the physical and digital realms.<n>The proposed Digital Twin Reference Architecture is named TwinArch. It is documented using the Views and Beyond methodology by the Software Engineering Institute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T07:53:11Z)
• Semi-Automated Design of Data-Intensive Architectures [49.1574468325115]
  This paper introduces a development methodology for data-intensive architectures.<n>It guides architects in (i) designing a suitable architecture for their specific application scenario, and (ii) selecting an appropriate set of concrete systems to implement the application.<n>We show that the description languages we adopt can capture the key aspects of data-intensive architectures proposed by researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T16:01:11Z)
• Evaluation of Architectural Synthesis Using Generative AI [49.1574468325115]
  This paper presents a comparative evaluation of two systems: GPT-4o and Claude 3.5, in the task of architectural 3D synthesis.<n>We conduct a case study on two buildings from Palladio's Four Books of Architecture (1965): Villa Rotonda and Palazzo Porto.<n>We assess the systems' abilities in (1) interpreting 2D and 3D representations of buildings from drawings, (2) encoding the buildings into a CAD software script, and (3) self-improving based on outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T18:39:28Z)
• How Do OSS Developers Reuse Architectural Solutions from Q&A Sites: An Empirical Study [5.568316292260523]
  Developers reuse programming-related knowledge on Q&A sites.<n>Seven categories of architectural solutions from Q&A sites have been reused to solve those problems.<n> OSS developers often rely on ad hoc ways to incorporate architectural solutions from SO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-07T18:53:30Z)
• Serving Deep Learning Model in Relational Databases [70.53282490832189]
  Serving deep learning (DL) models on relational data has become a critical requirement across diverse commercial and scientific domains. We highlight three pivotal paradigms: The state-of-the-art DL-centric architecture offloads DL computations to dedicated DL frameworks. The potential UDF-centric architecture encapsulates one or more tensor computations into User Defined Functions (UDFs) within the relational database management system (RDBMS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T06:01:35Z)
• Architecture Knowledge Representation and Communication Industry Survey [0.0]
  We aim to understand the current practice in architecture knowledge, and to explore where sustainability can be applied to address sustainability in software architecture in the future. We used a survey, which utilized a questionnaire containing 34 questions and collected responses from 45 architects working at a prominent bank in the Netherlands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T18:17:16Z)
• Enhancing Architecture Frameworks by Including Modern Stakeholders and their Views/Viewpoints [48.87872564630711]
  The stakeholders with data science and Machine Learning related concerns, such as data scientists and data engineers, are yet to be included in existing architecture frameworks.<n>We surveyed 61 subject matter experts from over 25 organizations in 10 countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T21:54:34Z)
• A Compositional Approach to Creating Architecture Frameworks with an Application to Distributed AI Systems [16.690434072032176]
  We show how compositional thinking can provide rules for the creation and management of architectural frameworks for complex systems. The aim of the paper is not to provide viewpoints or architecture models specific to AI systems, but instead to provide guidelines on how a consistent framework can be built up with existing, or newly created, viewpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-27T18:05:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.