Open Source Stewardship Communities: "We need you, but not your pull request"

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12236v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 21:48:55 GMT
• Title: Open Source Stewardship Communities: "We need you, but not your pull request"
• Abstract summary: Human-centric AI for software engineering means keeping humans responsible for work performed with AI.<n>In Open Source Software (OSS), AI lowers the cost of implementing changes, but reviewing someone else's contribution remains comparatively expensive.<n>This raises a broader question: what happens to the human community when coding agents let maintainers replace implementation work once supplied by external contributors?
• Score: 1.384611471396738
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Human-centric AI for software engineering means keeping humans responsible for work performed with AI. In Open Source Software (OSS), AI lowers the cost of implementing changes, but reviewing someone else's contribution remains comparatively expensive, so some projects now restrict who may contribute implementations while still welcoming other participation---not because the code is AI-generated, but because it no longer justifies the review cost. We call the resulting form a stewardship community: a small core retains implementation authority while a broader community continues to shape the software without writing code, and access to coding increasingly depends on approval rather than self-initiated contribution. This raises a broader question: what happens to the human community when coding agents let maintainers replace implementation work once supplied by external contributors? For human-centric software engineering, keeping humans in control of AI agents is not enough: AI can replace implementation labor while weakening how OSS communities renew themselves.

Related papers

• ''You Can't Open an LLM With a Screwdriver'': The De-Democratization of Software [10.424169529626694]
  Claims that generative AI will soon write all of the code have led to predictions that programming is nearing its end.<n>This vision paper argues that AI does not eliminate software engineering expertise but shifts where that expertise becomes most critical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T15:35:40Z)
• The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation [107.84677954791773]
  We argue that human participation may persist even with highly capable AI systems.<n>In some activities, the target is not fully specified in advance but instead emerges through the interaction itself.<n>This perspective has important implications for the limits of automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T17:33:43Z)
• Human Oversight and Overload: Two Hidden and Costly Burdens of AI-Assisted Software Engineering [0.6700873164609007]
  AI is changing how software engineers work, but it often comes with hidden burdens and costs.<n>In this paper, we characterize two such often-overlooked burdens.<n>The need for human oversight is not optional-engineers must review, validate, and sometimes rework what AI produces.<n>At the same time, the flood of AI suggestions, prompts, and possible solutions can leave developers mentally stretched.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T06:53:45Z)
• Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Review [2.2807488730605296]
  We present a vision for an AI-powered code review workflow combining specialized agents with human-controlled quality.<n>We identify major open challenges for responsible adoption, including reliability, bias, privacy, automation bias, transparency, and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T17:04:21Z)
• To Copilot and Beyond: 22 AI Systems Developers Want Built [8.021702941771972]
  We surveyed 860 Microsoft developers to understand where they want AI support, and where they want it to stay out.<n>We identify 22 AI systems that developers want built across five task categories.<n>For each, we describe the problem it solves, what makes it hard to build, and the constraints developers place on its behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T05:31:34Z)
• The Rise of AI Teammates in Software Engineering (SE) 3.0: How Autonomous Coding Agents Are Reshaping Software Engineering [10.252332355171237]
  This paper introduces AIDev, the first largescale dataset capturing how such agents operate in the wild.<n>Spanning over 456,000 pull requests by five leading agents, AIDev provides an unprecedented empirical foundation for studying autonomous teammates in software development.<n>The dataset includes rich on PRs, authorship, review timelines, code changes, and integration outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-20T15:15:58Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• SciMaster: Towards General-Purpose Scientific AI Agents, Part I. X-Master as Foundation: Can We Lead on Humanity's Last Exam? [51.112225746095746]
  We introduce X-Master, a tool-augmented reasoning agent designed to emulate human researchers.<n>X-Masters sets a new state-of-the-art record on Humanity's Last Exam with a score of 32.1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:50:52Z)
• From Defects to Demands: A Unified, Iterative, and Heuristically Guided LLM-Based Framework for Automated Software Repair and Requirement Realization [44.99833362998488]
  This manuscript signals a new era in the integration of artificial intelligence with software engineering.<n>We present a formalized, iterative methodology proving that AI can fully replace human programmers in all aspects of code creation and refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T14:54:21Z)
• OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents [109.8507367518992]
  We introduce OpenHands, a platform for the development of AI agents that interact with the world in similar ways to a human developer.<n>We describe how the platform allows for the implementation of new agents, safe interaction with sandboxed environments for code execution, and incorporation of evaluation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T17:50:43Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.