Bayesian Optimisation Using Product-of-Experts Gaussian Process Models with Uncertainty Calibration
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15555v1
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:37:35 GMT
- Title: Bayesian Optimisation Using Product-of-Experts Gaussian Process Models with Uncertainty Calibration
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces BO-pro-c, a Bayesian optimisation algorithm that uses GP-pro-c as its surrogate model.<n> Experimental results suggest BO-pro-c maintains competitive optimisation performance while achieving a 0.9% reduction in simple regret.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Bayesian optimisation (BO) typically relies on a single global Gaussian process (GP) model as its surrogate model. However, GP regression has cubic computational complexity in the number of training data points, limiting its applicability to large-scale optimisation problems. The product-of-experts Gaussian process model with uncertainty calibration (GP-pro-c) mitigates this limitation by combining multiple local GP experts, enabling improved uncertainty quantification, reduced computational cost, and preservation of global correlations. Despite these desirable properties, the use of GP-pro-c in BO has not been thoroughly studied. This paper introduces BO-pro-c, a Bayesian optimisation algorithm that uses GP-pro-c as its surrogate model, and evaluate its performance across a diverse range of BO settings. Experimental results suggest that BO-pro-c maintains competitive optimisation performance while achieving a 0.9% reduction in simple regret and a 39.4% reduction in computational overhead relative to a BO algorithm based on a single global GP model.
Related papers
- Information-Based Calibration of Uncertainty Quantification in Product-of-Experts Gaussian Process Models [6.3565351281858495]
Product-of-experts GP models (GP-pro) combine local GP models to capture global correlations.<n>We propose GP-pro-c, a product-of-experts GP model that calibrates these variances using an information-based method.<n>Experiments show GP-pro-c achieves average reductions of 2.3% in NLL and 12.0% in ENCE compared with the uncalibrated GP-pro model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-29T16:13:35Z) - Gradient-based Sample Selection for Faster Bayesian Optimization [10.137754677594861]
We propose a novel approach, gradient-based sample selection Bayesian Optimization (GSSBO), to enhance the computational efficiency of BO.<n>Our approach significantly reduces the computational cost of GP fitting in BO while maintaining optimization performance comparable to baseline methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-10T13:38:15Z) - Co-Learning Bayesian Optimization [28.394424693363103]
We propose a novel BO algorithm labeled as co-learning BO (CLBO), which exploits both model diversity and agreement on unlabeled information to improve the overall surrogate accuracy with limited samples.<n>Through tests on five numerical toy problems and three engineering benchmarks, the effectiveness of proposed CLBO has been well demonstrated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-23T02:25:10Z) - Robust Bayesian Optimization via Localized Online Conformal Prediction [37.549297668783254]
We introduce localized online conformal prediction-based Bayesian optimization (LOCBO)<n>LOCBO calibrates the GP model through localized online conformal prediction (CP)<n>We provide theoretical performance guarantees for LOCBO's iterates that hold for the unobserved objective function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-26T12:45:54Z) - Sample-efficient Bayesian Optimisation Using Known Invariances [56.34916328814857]
We show that vanilla and constrained BO algorithms are inefficient when optimising invariant objectives.
We derive a bound on the maximum information gain of these invariant kernels.
We use our method to design a current drive system for a nuclear fusion reactor, finding a high-performance solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T12:51:46Z) - Poisson Process for Bayesian Optimization [126.51200593377739]
We propose a ranking-based surrogate model based on the Poisson process and introduce an efficient BO framework, namely Poisson Process Bayesian Optimization (PoPBO)
Compared to the classic GP-BO method, our PoPBO has lower costs and better robustness to noise, which is verified by abundant experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T02:54:50Z) - Provably Efficient Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Gaussian Process Hyperparameter Estimation [44.53678257757108]
We propose a new BO method that can sub-linearly converge to the objective function's global optimum.
Our method uses a multi-armed bandit technique (EXP3) to add random data points to the BO process.
We demonstrate empirically that our method outperforms existing approaches on various synthetic and real-world problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-12T03:35:45Z) - Surrogate modeling for Bayesian optimization beyond a single Gaussian
process [62.294228304646516]
We propose a novel Bayesian surrogate model to balance exploration with exploitation of the search space.
To endow function sampling with scalability, random feature-based kernel approximation is leveraged per GP model.
To further establish convergence of the proposed EGP-TS to the global optimum, analysis is conducted based on the notion of Bayesian regret.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-27T16:43:10Z) - Likelihood-Free Inference with Deep Gaussian Processes [70.74203794847344]
Surrogate models have been successfully used in likelihood-free inference to decrease the number of simulator evaluations.
We propose a Deep Gaussian Process (DGP) surrogate model that can handle more irregularly behaved target distributions.
Our experiments show how DGPs can outperform GPs on objective functions with multimodal distributions and maintain a comparable performance in unimodal cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-18T14:24:05Z) - Randomised Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound for Bayesian
Optimisation [60.93091603232817]
We develop a modified Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) acquisition function.
This is done by sampling the exploration-exploitation trade-off parameter from a distribution.
We prove that this allows the expected trade-off parameter to be altered to better suit the problem without compromising a bound on the function's Bayesian regret.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T00:28:41Z) - Global Optimization of Gaussian processes [52.77024349608834]
We propose a reduced-space formulation with trained Gaussian processes trained on few data points.
The approach also leads to significantly smaller and computationally cheaper sub solver for lower bounding.
In total, we reduce time convergence by orders of orders of the proposed method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-21T20:59:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.