Digital Persuasion: Understanding the Impact of Online Influencers on Public Opinion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16062v1
• Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 10:10:29 GMT
• Title: Digital Persuasion: Understanding the Impact of Online Influencers on Public Opinion
• Abstract summary: We study the problem of opinion dynamics by proposing a framework based on Friedkin-Johnsen (FJ)<n>The proposed framework assesses the impact of influential versus random users on the overall community opinion.<n>This study demonstrates how digital influencers on social media can shape public opinion regarding a subject or cause.
• Score: 0.6459652643027808
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The studying of opinion dynamics and its propagation within social networks is crucial for addressing a wide range of challenges, including political polarization, public health, and marketing strategies. In this work, we study the problem of opinion dynamics by proposing a framework based on Friedkin-Johnsen (FJ) to identifies influential users and study their impact on dynamics opinions of community. The FJ model assume each individual have two opinions: initial and expressed. Through a series of initial opinion manipulation experiments, the proposed framework assesses the impact of influential versus random users on the overall community opinion. The proposed framework is validated using a tweet dataset representing the U.S. presidential election. The results shows that influencers with highest influencing score, significantly shift the overall community opinion. Moreover, the results shows that the impact of influencers not limited to direct neighbors , but beyond it, to their neighbors of neighbors . This study demonstrates how digital influencers on social media can shape public opinion regarding a subject or cause.

Related papers

• Persuasive and Compliant Tendencies Predict Group Decision-Making in Humans and Language Models [65.21691850622413]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved in group decision-making with humans.<n>We introduce DecisionQE, a questionnaire-based framework for measuring each model's persuasive and compliant tendencies.<n>We show that stronger persuasive tendency does not significantly improve group outcomes, whereas compliant-oriented models show more stable advantages in cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T15:50:56Z)
• Traits of a Leader: User Influence Level Prediction through Sociolinguistic Modeling [8.890331069484203]
  We develop a model that significantly outperforms the baseline by leveraging demographic and personality data.<n>This approach consistently improves RankDCG scores across eight different domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T22:37:19Z)
• Synthetic Social Media Influence Experimentation via an Agentic Reinforcement Learning Large Language Model Bot [7.242974711907219]
  This study provides a novel simulated environment that combines agentic intelligence with Large Language Models (LLMs) to test topic-specific influence mechanisms.<n>Our framework contains agents that generate posts, form opinions on specific topics, and socially follow/unfollow each other based on the outcome of discussions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T11:37:12Z)
• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• Biased AI can Influence Political Decision-Making [64.9461133083473]
  This paper presents two experiments investigating the effects of partisan bias in large language models (LLMs) on political opinions and decision-making.<n>We found that participants exposed to partisan biased models were significantly more likely to adopt opinions and make decisions which matched the LLM's bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T22:56:00Z)
• Unveiling the Truth and Facilitating Change: Towards Agent-based Large-scale Social Movement Simulation [43.46328146533669]
  Social media has emerged as a cornerstone of social movements, wielding significant influence in driving societal change. We introduce a hybrid framework HiSim for social media user simulation, wherein users are categorized into two types. We construct a Twitter-like environment to replicate their response dynamics following trigger events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T06:28:54Z)
• The Anatomy Spread of Online Opinion Polarization: The Pivotal Role of Super-Spreaders in Social Networks [0.0]
  Type A has a significant influence in shaping opinions, Type B acts as a counterbalance to A, and Type C functions like media, providing an objective viewpoint. The findings offer insights for improving online communication security and understanding social influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T20:29:50Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
  SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics. Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z)
• InfluencerRank: Discovering Effective Influencers via Graph Convolutional Attentive Recurrent Neural Networks [15.461845673443804]
  We propose InfluencerRank that ranks influencers by their effectiveness based on their posting behaviors and social relations over time. Experiments have been conducted on an Instagram dataset that consists of 18,397 influencers with their 2,952,075 posts published within 12 months.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T15:48:08Z)
• Fair Effect Attribution in Parallel Online Experiments [57.13281584606437]
  A/B tests serve the purpose of reliably identifying the effect of changes introduced in online services. It is common for online platforms to run a large number of simultaneous experiments by splitting incoming user traffic randomly. Despite a perfect randomization between different groups, simultaneous experiments can interact with each other and create a negative impact on average population outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T17:15:51Z)
• Effects of Multi-Aspect Online Reviews with Unobserved Confounders: Estimation and Implication [19.74820808192969]
  We study the effects of online reviews on business revenue and direct effects with the numerical cause -- ratings -- being the mediator. We draw on recent advances in machine learning and causal inference to together estimate the hidden confounders and causal effects. We present empirical evaluations using real-world examples to discuss the importance and implications of differentiating the multi-aspect effects in strategizing business operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T23:38:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.