Not Another Text Benchmark: Putting the "Visual" Back in Visual Question Answering for Large Video Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17112v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:41:08 GMT
• Title: Not Another Text Benchmark: Putting the "Visual" Back in Visual Question Answering for Large Video Models
• Abstract summary: We introduce three new vision-centric evaluation benchmarks in temporal frame retrieval, video future prediction, and causal memory distortion.<n>We show that current frontier models exhibit significant weakness when attempting to reason through visual queries, rather than text.
• Score: 97.0559653915626
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large video models have exhibited impressive performance on a wide range of visual question answering tasks, owing to the rise of powerful, pretrained text and vision encoders. The usefulness of such models have also been demonstrated on a wide range of benchmarks, with an important caveat - the dominant approach in these benchmarks evaluates multiple choice reasoning via text options. This is a natural way to test text-based reasoning in these models, and has led to significant insights regarding model behavior in the community. In this work, we ask a different question - what happens when the evaluation modality is visual, rather than text? We introduce three new vision-centric evaluation benchmarks in temporal frame retrieval, video future prediction, and causal memory distortion, all designed around evaluating visual understanding capabilities in large video models. Our approach complements the existing approaches to evaluate video understanding in frontier models. We show that current frontier models exhibit significant weakness when attempting to reason through visual queries, rather than text. We conclude with an extended analysis section that provides pointers for future improvements in visual understanding for large video models.

Related papers

• Object-centric Video Question Answering with Visual Grounding and Referring [43.963739052764595]
  We introduce a VideoLLM model, capable of performing both object referring for input and grounding for output in video reasoning tasks.<n>We also propose STOM, a novel approach that propagates arbitrary visual prompts input at any single timestamp to the remaining frames within a video.<n>We conduct comprehensive experiments on VideoInfer and other existing benchmarks across video question answering and referring object segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T18:11:23Z)
• VidText: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation for Video Text Understanding [56.121054697977115]
  VidText is a benchmark for comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of video text understanding.<n>It covers a wide range of real-world scenarios and supports multilingual content.<n>It introduces a hierarchical evaluation framework with video-level, clip-level, and instance-level tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T19:39:35Z)
• VBench++: Comprehensive and Versatile Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Models [111.5892290894904]
  VBench is a benchmark suite that dissects "video generation quality" into specific, hierarchical, and disentangled dimensions. We provide a dataset of human preference annotations to validate our benchmarks' alignment with human perception. VBench++ supports evaluating text-to-video and image-to-video.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T17:54:41Z)
• Rethinking Video-Text Understanding: Retrieval from Counterfactually Augmented Data [19.210471935816273]
  We propose a novel evaluation task for video-text understanding, namely retrieval from counterfactually augmented data (RCAD) and a new Feint6K dataset. To succeed on our new evaluation task, models must derive a comprehensive understanding of the video from cross-frame reasoning. Our approach successfully learn more discriminative action embeddings and improves results on Feint6K when applied to multiple video-text models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T01:55:48Z)
• Vamos: Versatile Action Models for Video Understanding [23.631145570126268]
  We propose versatile action models (Vamos), a learning framework powered by a large language model as the reasoner'' We evaluate Vamos on five benchmarks, Ego4D, NeXT-QA, IntentQA, Spacewalk-18, and Ego on its capability to model temporal dynamics, encode visual history, and perform reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T17:44:24Z)
• EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models [70.19437817951673]
  We argue that it is hard to judge the large conditional generative models from the simple metrics since these models are often trained on very large datasets with multi-aspect abilities. Our approach involves generating a diverse and comprehensive list of 700 prompts for text-to-video generation. Then, we evaluate the state-of-the-art video generative models on our carefully designed benchmark, in terms of visual qualities, content qualities, motion qualities, and text-video alignment with 17 well-selected objective metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T17:50:46Z)
• Helping Hands: An Object-Aware Ego-Centric Video Recognition Model [60.350851196619296]
  We introduce an object-aware decoder for improving the performance of ego-centric representations on ego-centric videos. We show that the model can act as a drop-in replacement for an ego-awareness video model to improve performance through visual-text grounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T17:58:11Z)
• Understanding ME? Multimodal Evaluation for Fine-grained Visual Commonsense [98.70218717851665]
  It is unclear whether the models really understand the visual scene and underlying commonsense knowledge due to limited evaluation data resources. We present a Multimodal Evaluation (ME) pipeline to automatically generate question-answer pairs to test models' understanding of the visual scene, text, and related knowledge. We then take a step further to show that training with the ME data boosts the model's performance in standard VCR evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T21:44:33Z)
• Fill-in-the-blank as a Challenging Video Understanding Evaluation Framework [19.031957183047048]
  We introduce a novel dataset consisting of 28,000 videos and fill-in-the-blank tests. We show that both a multimodal model and a strong language model have a large gap with human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T04:00:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.