Can We Stop The Ads? Taxonomy and Characterization of Smartphone Splash Ads and Existing Countermeasures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17316v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:24:14 GMT
• Title: Can We Stop The Ads? Taxonomy and Characterization of Smartphone Splash Ads and Existing Countermeasures
• Abstract summary: Splash ads are full-screen advertisements that pop up and appear as the first interaction page when users start an app.<n>We analyze 108 documented implementations of advertising defenses to examine their applicability to splash ads and the requirements users face when deploying them.
• Score: 11.499456549955482
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Splash ads are full-screen advertisements that pop up and appear as the first interaction page when users start an app, often tricking users into unknowingly activating certain trigger mechanisms, such as moving the phone to redirect users to other profit-driven third parties. So far, splash ads have already caused significant real-world impacts, ranging from significantly delaying emergency response to distracting drivers, as well as degrading accessibility of apps to vision-impaired users. We analyze 108 documented implementations of advertising defenses to examine their applicability to splash ads and the requirements users face when deploying them. Our analysis identifies substantial deployment barriers, including device rooting or jailbreaking, runtime code injection, and application modification. Options without these requirements can still involve additional permissions, rule maintenance, source compilation, or payment. In our evaluation of 13 configurations of 11 tools across 10 popular apps, only one tool prevented the target ad-triggered navigation across all ten apps. It required Accessibility permission, and ads remained visible for approximately one second before dismissal. Other tested configurations failed to prevent navigation or, in some cases, left host apps unable to launch or stuck on the ad page. We further analyze the outstanding challenges and pos- sible future directions, highlighting the urgent need to incentivize smartphone manufacturers to provide more friendly and regulated platforms.

Related papers

• When Ad Networks Misbehave: Understanding Risks of Semi-Drive-By Splash Ads [13.802323882269995]
  We investigate the mobile splash ads ecosystem, where monetization relies on interaction signals that are difficult to verify end-to-end.<n>We uncover a previously less-known form of fraud at the ad-network layer in which splash ads are triggered not by intentional user actions but by incidental or indirect interactions.<n>By translating non-ad interactions into billable engagement events, ad networks can inflate performance metrics, overcharge advertisers, and erode user trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T00:54:43Z)
• MANA: Towards Efficient Mobile Ad Detection via Multimodal Agentic UI Navigation [28.21505173665395]
  We present MANA, the first agentic multimodal reasoning framework for mobile ad detection.<n>We implement and evaluate MANA on commercial smartphones over 200 apps, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T12:19:41Z)
• External Evaluation of Discrimination Mitigation Efforts in Meta's Ad Delivery [47.418845064441605]
  We show that the Variance Reduction System (VRS) implemented by Meta does not meaningfully improve access to opportunities for individuals.<n>We then conduct experiments to evaluate VRS with real-world ads, and show that while VRS does reduce variance, it also raises advertiser costs.<n>We show our approach outperforms VRS by both increasing ad exposure for users from all groups and reducing cost to advertisers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T19:29:26Z)
• Attacking Vision-Language Computer Agents via Pop-ups [61.744008541021124]
  We show that VLM agents can be easily attacked by a set of carefully designed adversarial pop-ups.<n>This distraction leads agents to click these pop-ups instead of performing their tasks as usual.<n>Basic defense techniques, such as asking the agent to ignore pop-ups or including an advertisement notice, are ineffective against the attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:56:42Z)
• Careful About What App Promotion Ads Recommend! Detecting and Explaining Malware Promotion via App Promotion Graph [25.180100700815466]
  In Android apps, their developers frequently place app promotion ads, namely advertisements to promote other apps.<n>The inadequate vetting of ad content allows malicious developers to exploit app promotion ads as a new distribution channel for malware.<n>We propose a novel approach, named ADGPE, that integrates app user interface exploration with graph learning to automatically collect app promotion ads, detect malware promoted by these ads, and explain the promotion mechanisms employed by the detected malware.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T03:39:13Z)
• Accessibility Issues in Ad-Driven Web Applications [3.9531869396416344]
  Third-party advertisements (ads) are a vital revenue source for free web services, but they introduce significant accessibility challenges. We conduct the first large-scale investigation of 430K website elements, including nearly 100K ad elements, to understand the accessibility of ads on websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T09:50:06Z)
• Why am I Still Seeing This: Measuring the Effectiveness Of Ad Controls and Explanations in AI-Mediated Ad Targeting Systems [55.02903075972816]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of Meta's "See less" ad control and the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting. We find that utilizing the "See less" ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics. We find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T18:03:11Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• An Empirical Study of In-App Advertising Issues Based on Large Scale App Review Analysis [67.58267006314415]
  We present a large-scale analysis on ad-related user feedback from App Store and Google Play. From a statistical analysis of 36,309 ad-related reviews, we find that users care most about the number of unique ads and ad display frequency during usage. Some ad issue types are addressed more quickly by developers than other ad issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-22T05:38:24Z)
• General-Purpose User Embeddings based on Mobile App Usage [46.343844014289246]
  behaviors on mobile app usage, including retention, installation, and uninstallation, can be a good indicator for both long-term and short-term interests of users. Traditionally, user modeling from mobile app usage heavily relies on handcrafted feature engineering. We present a tailored AutoEncoder-coupled Transformer Network (AETN), by which we overcome these challenges and achieve the goals of reducing manual efforts and boosting performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T12:01:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.